Northampton Court Authority Explained

Uk

It is not a court,

Only a court in law can issue a fine

Admin courts are unlawful as stated in halsburys law

Are you stateing admin courts are lawful

Are admin courts lawful yes or no

You are clearly giving false information that is stated in caselaw

You are clearly programed to be giving false information

All Administrative Courts are Unlawful The next time you get ANY BS from the local council, police or any other revenue collection disguised as a “Charge/fine” I suggest you read the following and from these FACTS make up some pertinent questions to send prior to agreeing any invitation to appear (I’m not going to do it all for you.) Halsbury's Laws of England are regarded as the overall authority on England’s Laws. Under "STATUTES (VOLUME *(*) (REISSUE))/*. NATURE OF PRIMARY LEGISLATION/(*) DEFINITION AND CLASSIFICATION/(iii) Particular Types of Act/ A. CONSTITUTIONAL, TREATY AND FINANCIAL ACTS/*. Constitutional Acts", we see: (iii) Particular Types of Act A. CONSTITUTIONAL, TREATY AND FINANCIAL ACTS *. Constitutional Acts. The British Constitution is said to be 'unwritten'. This only means that, unlike most countries, the United Kingdom does not possess a single comprehensive constitution and much of its constitutional principle is embodied in the common law. There are nevertheless a number of historic statutes regarded as embodying and setting forth the state's constitutional principles. *. Any modern Act which amends or adds to these may also be regarded as a constitutional Act *. The main significance of classing an Act as a constitutional Act lies in the nature of the interpretative criteria which then apply to it. In particular, the rights the Act confers, having the quality of constitutional rights, will be regarded by the courts as fundamental and not to be displaced except by clear words. * See eg Magna Carta (*); the Bill of Rights (*); the Act of Settlement (*); the Septennial Act *. * See eg the Parliament Acts * and *; the Crown Proceedings Act *; the Representation of the People Acts * to *; the House of Commons Disqualification Acts * and *; the Crown Estate Act *; and the Supreme Court Act *. NOTE *--Supreme Court Act * now cited as Senior Courts Act *: Constitutional Reform Act * Sch * para * (in force on * October *: SI */*). The Constitution derives from the Magna Carta * - and also the Bill of Rights (*); the Act of Settlement (*); the Septennial Act *.- as well as Parliament Acts * and *; the Crown Proceedings Act *; the Representation of the People Acts * to *; the House of Commons Disqualification Acts * and *; the Crown Estate Act *; and the Supreme Court Act *. As Lord Halsbury stated: “It is a constitutional principle that the assent of the Queen & Parliament is prerequisite to the establishment of a Court which can operate a system of administrative law in Her Majesty’s Courts in England. This was confirmed by Lord Denning during the debates on the European Communities Amendment Bill, HL Deb * October * vol * cc246-* * at *: “There is our judicial system deriving from the Crown as the source and fountain of justice. No court You might also want to ask Where is the full and completed case file? Reminding them of the CPR part * https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part31 Justice Swift is telling us that, driving without government documents such as licences, MOT’s etc., cannot be ‘of itself criminal’, as the government licences these acts and therefore they cannot be criminal. This is still a leading case, as can be seen from this document which can be found on The House of Lords’ website. That covers so far the administrative courts and their treasonous application of the legal shenanigans but all unlawful nonetheless. REGARDING A RIGHT OF PASSAGE Ex parte Lewis (*) * Q.B.D. * Wills J. said in regard to public right of passage:- “The only ‘dedication’ in the legal sense that we are aware of is that of a public right of passage, of which the legal description is a ‘right for all Her Majesty’s subjects at all seasons of the year freely and at their will to pass and re-pass without let or hindrance.” By definition, a financial penalty procured through a pecuniary advantage, howsoever called, is diametrically opposed to “without let or hindrance”. This is operating outside of Statute, as a human being cannot be levied by the State or company; only Juristic persons (legal entities) can be so levied against. In other words, establish your living status (evidenced through affidavit) and get on with your life! You can also add the Act of union * which states our god-given right to free moment. Just check the inside cover page of your passport for confirmation, now tell me again about lockdown? Act of Union *: IV That all the Subjects of the United Kingdom of Great Britain shall from and after the Union have full Freedom and Intercourse of Trade and Navigation to and from any port or place within the said United Kingdom and the Dominions and Plantations thereunto belonging And that there be a Communication of all other Rights Privileges and Advantages which do or may belong to the Subjects of either Kingdom except where it is otherwayes expressly agreed in these Articles It goes on to say: XXV That all Laws and Statutes in either Kingdom so far as they are contrary to or inconsistent with the Terms of these Articles or any of them shall from and after the Union cease and become void and shall be so declared to be by the respective Parliaments of the said Kingdoms. (Lockdown?) You might also want to ask Where is the full and completed case file? Reminding them of the CPR part * https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part31 Justice Swift is telling us that, driving without government documents such as licences, MOT’s etc., cannot be ‘of itself criminal’, as the government licences these acts and therefore they cannot be criminal. This is still a leading case, as can be seen from this document which can be found on The House of Lords’ website. That covers so far the administrative courts and their treasonous application of the legal shenanigans but all unlawful nonetheless. REGARDING A RIGHT OF PASSAGE Ex parte Lewis (*) * Q.B.D. * Wills J. said in regard to public right of passage:- “The only ‘dedication’ in the legal sense that we are aware of is that of a public right of passage, of which the legal description is a ‘right for all Her Majesty’s subjects at all seasons of the year freely and at their will to pass and re-pass without let or hindrance.” By definition, a financial penalty procured through a pecuniary advantage, howsoever called, is diametrically opposed to “without let or hindrance”. This is operating outside of Statute, as a human being cannot be levied by the State or company; only Juristic persons (legal entities) can be so levied against. In other words, establish your living status (evidenced through affidavit) and get on with your life! You can also add the Act of union * which states our god-given right to free moment. Just check the inside cover page of your passport for confirmation, now tell me again about lockdown? Act of Union *: IV That all the Subjects of the United Kingdom of Great Britain shall from and after the Union have full Freedom and Intercourse of Trade and Navigation to and from any port or place within the said United Kingdom and the Dominions and Plantations thereunto belonging And that there be a Communication of all other Rights Privileges and Advantages which do or may belong to the Subjects of either Kingdom except where it is otherwayes expressly agreed in these Articles It goes on to say: XXV That all Laws and Statutes in either Kingdom so far as they are contrary to or inconsistent with the Terms of these Articles or any of them shall from and after the Union cease and become void and shall be so declared to be by the respective Parliaments of the said Kingdoms. (Lockd

Is that law infomation