Summary
In Colorado, without a formal operating agreement, business disputes can be complex. Individual A, as the registered owner, may face challenges due to non-contribution and actions taken without consent. Individual B, who contributed financially and operationally, can argue for equitable remedies and reimbursement. The verbal agreement and actions like setting up bank accounts and business cards support Individual Bs claims. The arrest of Individual B, despite initial police refusal, suggests potential procedural issues. This case appears primarily civil, but if Individual As actions are intended to harass, it could be considered harassment. Individual B should gather evidence to support their claims and seek legal representation to address both civil and potential criminal implications.Full Conversation
Can you review a case for me and provide an opinion
Sure, ****! Could you please provide more details about the case you would like me to review?
yes give me a moment
Sure, ****! Take your time. Whenever you're ready, please provide the details about the case you need assistance with, and I'll do my best to help.
So two people start a business. Individual A register the LLC in his name and then brings in Individual B. They agree to start a partnership but never finalize the operating agreement. Individual B paid in the agreed $*,* buy and did all the work to get the company up and running ( TAX IDs, Bank accounts, Business cards, Insurance etc) and Individual A did not contribute any monies and very minimal work. Individual B left the company and now Individual A is suing Individual B. What standing do either of them have?
Case Rating: *
****, in Pennsylvania, the situation can be complex without a formal operating agreement. However, here’s some general information:
- Individual A: Has legal standing as the registered owner of the LLC but may face challenges proving ownership of contributions made by Individual B.
- Individual B: Can argue for equitable remedies, including claiming reimbursement for contributions and unjust enrichment.
Was there any written or verbal agreement about the terms of the partnership and contributions?
The would be occurring in Colorado
Case Rating: *
****, since the case involves a business dispute in Colorado, it’s important to consider the lack of a formal operating agreement. Colorado courts may look at the contributions and actions of both parties.
- Individual A: Has standing as the registered owner but may face challenges due to lack of contribution.
- Individual B: Can argue for equitable remedies, reimbursement for contributions, and unjust enrichment.
Was there any written or verbal agreement about the terms of the partnership and contributions?
Yes verbal agreement the A would be *% partner and B *% partner. Both were to contribute $* startup finds which B did and A did not.
Case Rating: *
****, in this situation:
- Individual A: May have legal standing as the registered owner but faces challenges due to non-contribution.
- Individual B: Can argue for equitable remedies like reimbursement for contributions and unjust enrichment.
Did Individual A acknowledge the verbal agreement and contributions made by Individual B in any form (emails, messages, etc.)?
The money was deposited in the corporate checking account
Case Rating: *
****, the fact that the money was deposited in the corporate checking account can help support Individual B's claim. Here are some points to consider:
- Individual A: May have legal standing as the registered owner but faces challenges due to non-contribution and verbal agreement terms.
- Individual B: Can argue for reimbursement, unjust enrichment, and prove the verbal agreement through actions like depositing money.
Would you like more detailed information on how to proceed with this case?
Let me add a few more details.
Sure, ****. Please go ahead and add the additional details, and I'll do my best to provide you with the information you need.
Individual A tried to remove money for the company bank account without Individual B consent. Individual B froze the asserts off the bank account and moved the monies to a new seperate corporate account. Since then all the monies have remained untouched. The business cards made by Individual B and approved by Indivudual A have their names on their and title listed as owner.
Case Rating: *
****, the additional details strengthen Individual B's position. Here’s a brief summary:
- Individual A: Has legal standing as the registered owner but faces challenges due to non-contribution and the actions taken without consent.
- Individual B: Can argue for reimbursement, unjust enrichment, and has evidence of the verbal agreement and contributions (bank actions, business cards).
Would you like more detailed guidance on how to proceed with this case?
yes
Case Rating: *
****, it sounds like this could be a high-value case. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
If so, can you provide a bit more information about the issue?
Let me provide a few more details and I want your opinion not just a referral to lawyers
Case Rating: *
****, it sounds like you have a strong case, especially with the evidence of the verbal agreement, contributions, and the actions taken by both parties. Here are a few points to consider further:
- Individual A: Despite being the registered owner, their lack of contribution and attempting to remove money without consent can weaken their position.
- Individual B: The contributions made and actions taken (freezing assets, creating business cards) can support their claim for equitable remedies and reimbursement.
To proceed, Individual B should gather all evidence supporting their claims, including any communications, transactions, and documentation showing their contributions and agreed terms.
Would you like more detailed information on how to gather and present this evidence?
Individual A was given forms to access the bank account and become a signatory but never completed the required documents. The bank account was set up by individual B
Case Rating: *
****, here are some additional points to consider:
- Individual A: Their position is weakened further due to not completing the required documents to access the bank account.
- Individual B: Has stronger evidence to support their claims, including setting up the bank account and controlling the funds.
Would you like more detailed information on how to gather and present this evidence?
yes
Case Rating: *
****, it sounds like this could be a high-value case. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Can you give me a bit more information about the issue?
Based upon the above scenario, Individual A is refusing to settle the lawsuit. At what point does this become harassment. Individual A has a history of suing partners in the past and there is circumstantial evidence that individual A is trying to bankrupt Individual B and force B to move. What is you opinion about the information provided so far? Is this a civil case or is there evidence of criminal wrongdoing?
Case Rating: *
****, based on the information provided, this appears to be primarily a civil case regarding the enforcement of partnership agreements and equitable remedies. However, if Individual A's actions are genuinely intended to harass or bankrupt B, it could potentially be considered harassment. Harassment generally involves repeated conduct that causes significant distress or harm.
Would you like guidance on how to gather and present evidence for harassment claims?
Do you see any evidence of criminal activity from individual B?
Case Rating: *
Hi ****, based on the details provided, it doesn't appear that Individual B has engaged in any criminal activity. Their actions, such as freezing assets and moving funds to protect the company’s interests, seem to be in response to protect the business assets and contributions.
Would you like more detailed information on how to proceed with the civil case or gather evidence for a potential harassment claim?
Individual A filed criminal theft and extortion charges against individual B and Individual B was arrested. Individual A discussed with police officer * and they refused to file charges saying this was civil. Individual A then sought another police officer who filed charges and arrested B. Please provide an analysis of this developoment. Was individual B actions criminal? Was this arrest justifiable?
Case Rating: *
****, this situation is quite complex:
- Individual B's Actions: Based on the information, Individual B's actions (freezing and moving funds) seem to be protective and within their rights as a partner, especially since the funds were for business purposes.
- Arrest Justification: The initial refusal by the first police officer suggests that this is a civil matter. The arrest by the second officer may not be justifiable without clear evidence of criminal intent.
Would you like more detailed information on how to challenge the criminal charges?
Provide more detailed insight in this case please
Case Rating: *
****, this case seems to be quite significant and multi-faceted. Here are some detailed insights:
Individual B's Position:
-
Contribution & Actions: Individual B has contributed financially and through efforts (setting up accounts, etc.).
-
Protection of Assets: Freezing and moving funds to protect business interests seems justified.
-
Evidence: Verbal agreement, actions taken, and communications support Individual B’s claims.
Individual A’s Position:
-
Lack of Contribution: Individual A did not contribute financially and minimally worked.
-
Conduct: History of suing partners and attempting to remove funds without consent can negatively impact their position.
Arrest and Criminal Charges:
-
Initial Police Refusal: The first officer's refusal to file charges implies this is a civil matter.
-
Second Officer’s Actions: The involvement of a second officer and the arrest might be questionable and may lack justification without clear criminal intent.
Recommendations:
- Gather Evidence: Collect all communications, financial records, and documentation supporting the verbal agreement and contributions.
- Legal Representation: Due to the complexity and potential criminal implications, it's crucial to seek legal representation to challenge the criminal charges and address the civil dispute.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Individual A filed a civil suit, had individual B and their attorneys answer interrogatories while at the same time threatening criminal action but never clearly and definitely communicated to individual B that he had spoken to * police officers and that one said this was civil and that the second said it was criminal. Please provide an detailed legal analysis of this development
Case Rating: *
****, here’s a detailed analysis:
- Civil Suit & Interrogatories: Individual A’s actions in filing a civil suit and having interrogatories answered are standard legal procedures in civil disputes.
- Threatening Criminal Action: This could be seen as coercive if intended to pressure Individual B into settling the civil matter.
- Police Officer Communications: The lack of clear communication about the police officers’ differing opinions on the criminality suggests potential procedural issues. The first officer’s view that it’s civil and the second officer's filing of criminal charges could indicate inconsistency or overreach in the criminal process.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, can you provide a bit more information about the issue?
TRY ME!
Start a new chat