Illinois Child Support Rulings

So if the judge orders that I can only subpoena the respondents. motorcycle and auto loan records to be directly directly sent to her for her review. And this was to uncover or see if the respondent is, in fact, hiding income. or has a bigger income than he disclosed. not both motorcycle and auto loan show. the early payoffs with large sums of cash. which the judge have but yet she decided to squash my subpoena for the spouses bank records where his income is being hidden.

No, I want to provide those to the with along with my formal complaint

So I plan to provide. my motions. opposing party's motion My attached evidence and assigned court orders. for each motion.

So I need your opinion and your thoughts or your first initial thoughts about a situation that I'm about to describe concerning. this child support judge. So if she received the respondents motorcycle loan records for review meaning for the judge to review them to see if the respondent does in fact have it in income or more income than he disclosed to the court and this judge received those subpoenaed motorcycle records. early. September * and I received them from the court on December * * now immediately from my reviewing it clearly shows that the respondent made a cash down payment of $*,* on July * *. and fully paid off the motorcycle loan a month and a half later September * * with a lump sum of$*

And as I also seen and also provided plenty. of them to this judge, the respondents bank records before the subpoenaed motorcycle loan records went to the judge. clearly and directly showing the consistent result payments to the spouse. leaving his chase account with the ending balances anywhere. $* to $*.*.

The monthly income, the respondent. stated to the court was. about $* without any documented evidence, proving that as the respondent actually gets money under the table. and is not reflected in his W2 this judge then gets the respondents are alone records on March * * And were given to me on March * *. immediately upon my review while I was still in the court building. Clear documentation. Early payoff notification. Account paid in full notifications. of $*,* on August *. *. So my question here is, if these were subpoenaed to go directly to the judge for her review to see. if, in fact, the respondent has a higher income that was not disclosed to the court. meaning hidden income. wouldn't those be a clear indication that he does

But here's the situation, which is extremely odd. in my opinion, what I wanna know what's your first initial thoughts? are on this issue. So the judge received the motorcycle loan records first. and early September, around between the 6th and the 8th. of *. now because I've seen and also provided to the court the respondents Chase Bank Records showing. the consistent zell payments to the spouse I filed a motion for the court to either order the respondent or for the court to subpoena the spouses records.

I filed that motion on September *. *. Now keep in mind that judge already had the motorcycle loan records. in her possession. At first the judge stated for me to change the title of the motion to withdraw it, retitle it and refile it, which is exactly what I did. No hearing was conducted for that motion. Weeks later, about a month and a half, six weeks. as we were on the zoom. for another issue in this case I brought up that motion and questioned what's going on with it. The judge replied. * I've already denied that motion. And I replied. No, you did not, because none of the court orders reflect your statement Oh well, I'm denying it now.

Now let's move on. to the auto loan records. The judge received clear ly also early payoff notifications, account paid and full notifications in those documents Eighteen thousand Now keep in mind. Georgia already had the motorcycle loan records. Now she had the auto loan records. So when they were given to me while I was still in the court building, I reviewed them and immediately seeing that it was an early payoff account fully paid off August * * $*,*. I immediately got a subpoena stamp by the clerk. And submitted it to the Huntington Bank for the spouses bank records because these payments do not reflect are not reflected in the respondents. known accounts. and the judge. Plus. help me contempt for willingly subpoena. ing the spouses records which are directly relevant in this case.

So you think the judge is. doing the right thing.

Now, what evidence like that. disjudge. either did not even look at the records. or did review them and just chose to ignore it. And with the upcoming in person hearing for my reconsideration of ongoing child support. How is that supposed to be fair if she is blocking crucial evidence? Isn't she cheating my children once again?

These are yes or no questions.

Now, with evidence like that. disjudge. either did not even look at the records. or did review them and just chose to ignore it. And with the upcoming in person hearing for my reconsideration of ongoing child support. How is that supposed to be fair if she is blocking crucial evidence? Isn't she cheating my children once again? yes or no

So. For these reasons I need. to file a formal complaint

So now, if this judge did not. one time review. the court files that she has access to at anytime. does not look at relevant evidence provided to her and ignores such crucial evidence in the motorcycle and auto loan records. and on top of it is holding me in contempt for the subpoena. of the spouses records and squashing my subpoena What is all that considered as to the complaint board?

So what does the Illinois statute laws or rules actually state is? the role of a child support judge when it comes to retroactive child support, college education and ongoing task support payments Are they supposed to be making rulings on false verbal and written statements without it presented actual document by the opposing party?

And hear what else is concerning. The auto loan records show. that the respondent paid off the auto loan. $*,* as of August *. *. which is at the same time. I was trying to get the court to order the respondent to fully cover our twin sons college education. tuitions fees, sports fees, clothing But this court did not order the respondent. to contribute or cover any of it. The children were forced to get student loans.

and hear what else is concerning. The auto loan records show. that the respondent paid off the auto loan. $*,* as of August *. *. which is at the same time. I was trying to get the court to order the respondent to fully cover our twin sons college education. tuitions fees, sports fees, clothing But this court did not order the respondent. to contribute or cover any of it. The children were forced to get student loans. What would you say about this? What does this say about the court?

I wanna know if I provide all these evidence. to went along with my formal complaint to the board. What will they think about this situation? Seeing that the court did not order the respondent to cover any of that, but over here he paid off $*,* at the same time. at the same time. what does that say about the judge?

OK so. retroactive child support. should have been ordered from April *. * which is clearly in the court file. which was never looked at instead the judge made her ruling for retroactive based on the false claim by the opposing party. The judge was also provided directly via email. with the respondents chase. bank statements from * all the way through * including image of a cashier's check made out to the spouse for $*,* which were all ignored. and did not. ordered a respondent to cover anything for the boys, college education, not their tuitions, not clothing, not books, not transportation, not sports. The boys had to get student loans. Because the judge made her. ruling based on the opposing party stating that the respondent is financially struggling.

And also judge. are receiving the auto. loan records that motorcycle loan records. Clearly directly proving hidden income. a higher hidden income. So how can the upcoming hearing for reconsideration of the ongoing child support be fair? if she is squashing my subpoena for relevant records? now she had all this documents clearly. showing proof motorcycle loan records and Otter loan records are direct proof that the respondent does have a higher income than he disclosed. does in fact have hidden income The respondents Chase Bank Records also directly prove. that it's being hidden in his spouses, Huntingdon Bank accounts. But the judge is holding me in contempt. for subpoenaing those records. and squashing the subpoena. What does this say about the judge? What will this say to the complaint? board. How will they see this as

I need an accurate number for the formal complaint so I can ask if I can personally deliver the. complaint and evidence.

So after I received via email. the judges order for squashing the subpoena and holding me in contempt. I replied, that I'm writing to inform her that I will be filing a formal complaint for her refusal to look at relevant evidence in this case.

I'm asking was that OK that I did that.

So everything I've stated that this judge did. what is all that considered as?

She does not look at actual documented evidence. Clearly, even if she does look at some of it, she chooses to ignore it.

So what is that considered as?

I also see it as her attempt to hold me in contempt for subpoenaing the response. Bank records that are directly relevant in this case for uncovering the respondents actual income. as imitate intimation by this judge,

So can you tell me? what the judge actually caused? to my three children involved in this case. when it comes to retroactive child support, ongoing child support payment. And what is she continuing to do to my children? for blocking or keeping me from crucial evidence?

Now is that what is states in the Illinois statute of laws or rules or Supreme Court rules in Illinois that. that's what a child support judge is supposed to be doing.

So tell me exactly what she did to my children. with her actions. Clearly she is not following the rules. or laws.

And what is she further causing my children in this upcoming. reconsideration of ongoing child support. as she squashing my subpoena and not allowing me to get the records and holding me contempt for what I have a right to see the respondents hidden income