Child Support Judge Responsibilities

And what if a judge child support judge does not follow these rules for God? for guidelines?

So let's say for example, that I presented this judge. With the non custodial parents. bank statements that that. clearly show all the cell transfers to the girlfriend including a image of a cashier's check made out to the girlfriend from the non custodial parent in the amount of $*,* now. the girlfriend of the non custodial parent has been unemployed since * wouldn't it be relevant that the judge order the non custodial parent to provide the girlfriend's bank records to see where his money that is being transferred to her is going in what it's being used for? Yes or no

So again, let me ask you if. you are the judge in my case and I hand you the respondents bank records that clearly show all the cell transfers to the girlfriend from his account and a cashier's check for $*,*. Now, if you're the child support judge and I hand you those documents would you not wanna see the girl? friend's records. to determine where the non custodial parents money Why is it going to the girlfriend and what is it being used for?

And what is the judge's discretion? exactly

Now here's where I disagree with you. As Illinois does have a law when there is relevant documented evidence such as bank statements showing. all the transfers to a another account, such as the girlfriends. and documented evidence that the non custodial parent is putting down payments on properties purchasing. vehicles making monthly payments, paying mortgage, expensive vacations, but yet claiming not to have money And I also know that it's a fact that Illinois has a law making the girlfriends bank records irrelevant in this case.

What is the law? Illinois law that states that a door third parties bank records are relevant due to the respondents transfers. particularly in a child support case,

So again, my question to you if. the father's bank records show. that over $*,* have been transferred to the girlfriend Plus a cashier's check made out to the girlfriend for $*,*. now his bank records are clearly documented evidence clear. ly indicating that his money is being transferred to the girlfriend. Why would he? make a cashier's check out to the girlfriend for that amount.

Now this judge. Has not ordered the father to pay retroactive child support? which is odd?

Well, the actual card files show. my signature April. * * When I filed with HFS. also has the Cook County Sheriff's. records in there after serving the non custodial parent so I don't understand how this judge can just ignore the retroactive

Now this judge no matter the amount of documented evidence provided, she has. overlooked every single document where the non custodial parent falsely verbally state something and that's her ruling based off those lies Not one time throughout this case has her rulings or decisions been in the best interest of my children or their educational needs or their welfare or their needs Not one time.

So now, if I feel a complete against this judge and provide all the court orders. which are direct evidence that none of her rulings are in the best interest of my children or on behalf of my children, not one and also provide all the documented evidence that I have provided to this judge, and also provide all my motions that I have filed. and these people see that none of the judges rulings are in the best interest of the children And she did not order retroactive child support.

I wanna know what will happen if they see that. none of her rulings are based on the children. and she's overlooking documented evidence. and she overlooked and did not order retroactive It's kind of cheating the children.

Would you say that this is relevant to this? case, I need to. answer yes or no.IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT-DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION IN RE THE PARENTAGE OF: ) A.K., J.K., S.K., minor children, ) ) LULA KOROTKOV , ) Petitioner, ) ) No.: 2021D051242 and ) ) NASER BEGANOVIC, ) Respondent. ) MOTION TO RECONSIDER ORDER DENYING DISCOVERY OF RESPONDENT’S HIDDEN BANK ACCOUNT RECORDS FROM BANK OF AMERICA Now Comes the Petitioner, Lula Korotkov, pro se, pursuant to the Illinois Civil Code of Procedure, and respectfully moves this Honorable Court to reconsider its order dated August *, *, denying the Petitioner’s request for discovery of the Respondent’s bank records from the recently discovered hidden bank account at Bank of America. In support of this motion, Petitioner states as follows: *. This case involves ongoing child support proceedings aimed at ensuring accurate child support payments and full coverage of educational expenses in the best interest of my three children. I have diligently sought discovery of Naser’s financial records from his recently discovered second hidden bank account to ensure precise calculation of child support payments and comprehensive coverage of educational expenses. This is to guarantee that my three children receive the proper support they deserve for their well-being and educational needs. *. Being fully aware that Naser was earning under-the-table income and hiding his true monthly earnings, I persistently informed the court. I presented documented evidence demonstrating income cycling, diversion, and concealment, along with proof of inconsistencies in his financial explanations and documentation of the two known sources of his under-the-table income. Despite this, the evidence was dismissed as insufficient on June *, *. *. On June *, *, while at the Daily Center for our pretrial, I properly obtained a stamped subpoena from the circuit clerk, which I then served on Bank of America. *. On July *, *, I became aware that I did, in fact, find Naser’s second hidden bank account at Bank of America. *. As emphasized by Illinois statute and rules, in an ongoing civil case, especially a child support case pertaining to child support payments and full coverage of educational expenses, I have the right to obtain a subpoena from the circuit clerk for Naser’s hidden bank account records. *. The court's ruling, first made on July *, *, LULA is granted leave to issue a Subpoena Duces Tecum to the Bank of America conditioned on the following: a. Said Subpoena shall be returnable to the Court, thus, all the documents in response to the Subpoena shall be sent only to the Honorable Judge Aimen, Courtroom * of the Richard Daley Center, * W Washington St., Chicago, Illinois *; and b. LULA shall provide proper notice to NASER through counsel. and reiterated on August *, *, regarding granting LULA leave to file a subpoena to Bank of America with the following conditions, remains in full force and effect: a. Said subpoena shall be returnable to the court, thus, all the documents in response to the subpoena shall be sent only to the Honorable Judge Aimen, Courtroom * of the Richard Daley Center, * W Washington St., Chicago, Illinois *; and b. LULA shall provide proper notice to NASER through counsel. *. This ruling is in contradiction of Rule *(a), which generally allows for the issuance of subpoenas without needing the judge’s permission, ensuring transparency and review opportunities for the issuing party. The order breaches Rule *(a) by requiring the judge’s permission for a subpoena. *. Additionally, the order contradicts Rule *(b) by implying that I should notify the respondent and his attorney. The responsibility for notification generally lies with the bank, not with the issuing party. *. Furthermore, the order violates Rule *(a) by directing that bank records be sent only to the judge. This contradicts standard practice as per Rule *(a), which calls for transparency and review opportunities for the issuing party. *. I was supposed to receive these bank records on July *, *, to ensure that the child support calculations were based on Naser’s actual monthly income and to guarantee full coverage of educational expenses for the boys, prioritizing their well-being and educational needs. However, these court orders have only helped Naser evade his responsibility. *. Yesterday, August *, *, I spoke with the legal department at Bank of America and was informed that the subpoena for Naser’s hidden bank records has been stalled. They are unable to submit physical records to the court, as they have never encountered such a request in a child support case. *. I also spoke with an attorney who expressed concern about the judge’s orders. He pointed out that these orders seem to place an undue financial burden on the children while preventing me from accessing crucial financial information, as the primary goal of child support is to ensure the well-being and educational needs of the children are met. He also noted how unusual it was for a judge to order that the children apply for student loans while simultaneously denying access to relevant financial records. According to the attorney, these orders appear to be an attempt to prevent me from obtaining necessary financial information and place a financial burden on the children. This clearly indicates that the children’s welfare and educational needs are not being prioritized. He also stated that the children should not be applying for student loans before Naser’s actual income is determined. *. The court orders listed in Ms. Abellar’s drafted order dated August *, *, confirm the accuracy of what the attorney stated to me. *. It’s surprising that the court has overlooked the opposing party’s intentional efforts to deceive, create confusion, and stall the proceedings. They have distorted the judge’s order from June *, *, and secured an emergency order of protection in Kane County based on false and misleading claims. This was done to avoid submitting applications for the Parent PLUS loan, as Naser falsely claimed to have bad credit and to be sixty thousand dollars in debt. *. It’s surprising that this court has not noted that Naser is being investigated by the IRS for falsely claiming the children on his tax returns and manipulating his W2 forms. The same W2 forms that were justified by this court on June 27th, *. *. August *, *, was intended to be our continued pretrial from June *, *, for my motion for reconsideration of child support payments and the inclusion of Naser’s $*,*.* into his income. However, this did not occur. It was not even mentioned, nor is it referenced in Ms. Abellar’s drafted court order. Instead, the date became a hearing for the withdrawal of Ms. Abellar, which also did not happen, although it is mentioned in her drafted court order. *. The court should also note that Naser does, in fact, have the boys’ Social Security numbers on his old copies of his tax returns. It is concerning that this court accepts everything stated by Naser and his attorney without question and without any actual documented evidence. *. As both Ms. Abellar and Naser attempted to blame me for Naser’s failure to submit the Parent PLUS loan application. They falsely claimed that he couldn’t complete the application because I did not provide the boys’ Social Security numbers and school ID numbers. It was quite fascinating to watch their attempt to shift the blame onto me. as the court rules listed in his attorney’s drafted court order clearly demonstrates that Naser is the only one being prioritized. *. The court should also note that the only reason Naser suddenly wants access to school and medical records is because he has been falsely claiming that the children live with him and providing false school fee receipts to the IRS. This means Naser needs the children’s actual birth certificates, Social Security cards, and school enrollment records, which he does not have. The IRS is well aware that he does not have any of these documents in his possession. As I have previously stated, if he were to suddenly provide these documents to the IRS, they would know they were either falsified or illegally obtained. *. As shown in the attached documents, the intention is to impose further financial hardship on the children by forcing them to apply for student loans. This is also evidenced in the documents attached to my motion for clarification. The claim that he will pay *% of the expenses when the boys graduate in four years is false and will never happen. This burden will fall on the boys, as Naser has never been reliable and never will be. This is based on 17 years of experience. Unfortunately, this court is aiding him in achieving this goal. *. I am deeply concerned that the actions of this court have consistently favored the opposing party, to the detriment of my three children. This has led to a significant lack of trust in the court’s ability to prioritize the well-being and educational needs of my children. *. These are my children, and I will continue to fight for their well-being and best interests. *. According to * ILCS */* of the Illinois Compiled Statutes, the duty of support owed to children includes the obligation to provide for the reasonable and necessary physical, mental, and emotional health needs of the children. This statute emphasizes that child support should be based on the needs of the children. *. According to * ILCS */* of the Illinois Compiled Statutes, the court may award sums of money out of the property and income of either or both parties or the estate of a deceased parent, as equity may require, for the educational expenses of any children of the parties. Educational expenses may include, but are not limited to, tuition, fees, housing, medical expenses, reasonable living expenses during the academic year and periods of recess, and the cost of books and other supplies. *. In support of this motion, I have attached the following documents. Exhibit A: Contains an email I received on July *, *, that I forwarded to Ms. Abellar. A text message I received, also on July *, *, through the Talking Parents app. An email I sent to Ms. Abellar on August *, *, with pictures of the police reports. Exhibit B: Contains two text messages received through the Talking Parents app, one on August *, *, and the other on August *, *. WHEREFORE, the Petitioner, Lula Korotkov, respectfully requests that this Honorable Court: *. Reconsider its order dated August *, *, denying the Petitioner’s request for discovery of the Respondent’s bank records from the recently discovered hidden bank account at Bank of America. *. Order that the Respondent’s bank records from the hidden account at Bank of America be sent directly to the Petitioner. *. Ensure that the Respondent’s financial records are made available to the Petitioner to accurately calculate child support payments and ensure full coverage of educational expenses for the children. *. Provide any other relief that this Honorable Court deems just and equitable. Respectfully Submitted, Lula Korotkov Lula Korotkov */*/* Lula Korotkov * N, Central Park Ave Chicago IL, * *-*-* Alisagiana@yahoo.com PRO SE PETITIONERS’ VERIFICATION I, Lula Korotkov, acting Pro Se, under penalties as provided by law pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule * and Section *-* of the Code of Civil Procedure, certify that I have read the foregoing and within the motion. I further state that the allegations contained in the foregoing, and within the motion, are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. I further state that I have provided information which, to the best of my knowledge and belief, is true and correct. This motion is being filed with my consent and as part of my required duties in representing myself. I understand that by signing this verification, I am acknowledging that I am acting with my consent and at my direction and that I have based my actions and statements on the factual information provided by me. Lula Korotkov Pro Se Petitioner * N, Central Park Ave Chicago IL, * *-*-* Alisagiana@yahoo.com Lula Korotkov Lula Korotkov */*/*

So if I provide this motion that I filed with the court that the judge did not. denied for the second time, would it cause a bit of a problem for the judge along with everything else if I provide? I just want simple answers, yes or no.

Can you tell me why?

Would you say this would cause a problem also for the judge? Yes or no? And why?IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT - DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION IN RE THE PARENTAGE OF: A.K., J.K., S.K., minor children, LULA KOROTKOV, Petitioner, Pro Se v. No: 2021D051242 NASER BEGANOVIC, Respondent. OBJECTION TO JUDGE'S RULING REGARDING IRS IDENTITY PROTECTION PIN NOW COMES the Petitioner, Lula Korotkov, pro se, and respectfully objects to the judge's repeated rulings ordering the Petitioner to provide the IRS Identity Protection PIN (IP PIN) of her daughter to the Respondent. In support of this objection, the Petitioner states as follows: *. a. The court has ordered me to provide my daughter's IP PIN to Naser for tax purposes, as noted in the orders dated, February *, *, July *, * and November *, * *. Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (* ILCS */*): a. Section *(a): Governs child support, emphasizing the child's/children’s best interests. b. My compliance with IRS advisories aligns with my child's best interests and aims to protect her identity and financial security. *. Federal Tax Law (IRS Code): a. Section *: Governs the use of Identity Protection PINs to prevent tax fraud and identity theft. b. The IRS has advised me not to provide my daughter's IP PIN to Naser to protect her identity and prevent Naser from committing any further tax fraud. c. The IRS investigation into Naser’s false claims is ongoing. *. Child's Best Interests Standard: a. * ILCS */*.*: Defines the child's/children’s best interests in parental responsibilities, considering factors like the child's/children’s emotional well-being and stability. b. Naser has neglected our daughter and twin sons for over three years, providing no support or involvement in their lives. c. Providing the IP PIN to Naser, who is under IRS investigation, will further compromise my child's well-being and security. *. Federal Law Precedence: a. Federal tax law governs the proper claiming of dependents and the use of IP PINs. b. A state court order cannot override federal tax law or IRS advisories, which are designed to protect individuals from tax fraud and identity theft. *. Concerns Regarding Judicial Actions: a. Despite the overwhelming evidence and the IRS advisory, the judge has repeatedly ordered me to provide the IP PIN, threatening contempt for non-compliance. b. This repeated order raises significant concerns about the alignment with federal guidelines and the protection of my child's rights. c. The judge’s actions appear to favor Naser despite substantial evidence of financial misconduct, which undermines the principles of justice, and the best interests of the children involved. WHEREFORE, I respectfully request that this Honorable Court: *. Reconsider the repeated orders to provide my daughter's IP PIN to Naser. *. Recognize the advisory from the IRS and the precedence of federal tax law in this matter. *. Provide a clear explanation of the procedural and substantive reasons for any continued order. *. Grant any other relief that this Court deems just and equitable. Respectfully Submitted, Lula Korotkov Lula Korotkov */*/* Lula Korotkov * N, Central Park Ave Chicago IL, * *-*-* Alisagiana@yahoo.com PRO SE PETITIONERS’ VERIFICATION I, Lula Korotkov, acting Pro Se, under penalties as provided by law pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule * and Section *-* of the Code of Civil Procedure, certify that I have read the foregoing and within the motion. I further state that the allegations contained in the foregoing, and within the motion, are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. I further state that I have provided information which, to the best of my knowledge and belief, is true and correct. This motion is being filed with my consent and as part of my required duties in representing myself. I understand that by signing this verification, I am acknowledging that I am acting with my consent and at my direction and that I have based my actions and statements on the factual information provided by me. Lula Korotkov Pro Se Petitioner * N, Central Park Ave Chicago IL, * *-*-* Alisagiana@yahoo.com Lula Korotkov Lula Korotkov */*/*

What about this? If I provide it along with the complaint against the judge, would it cause the judge, an issue with the board? Yes or no and why?IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT - DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION IN RE THE PARENTAGE OF: A.K., J.K., S.K., minor children, LULA KOROTKOV, Petitioner, Pro Se v. No: 2021D051242 NASER BEGANOVIC, Respondent. MOTION TO ORDER RESPONDENT TO PROVIDE GIRLFRIEND’S BANK RECORDS AND FOR SUBPOENA IF NECESSARY NOW COMES the Petitioner, Lula Korotkov, pro se, and moves this Honorable Court to order the Respondent, Naser Beganovic, to produce the bank records of the Respondent’s girlfriend, Lisa Calderon, and to issue a subpoena if necessary for these records from Huntington Bank, pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule * and the Illinois Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (* ILCS */). In support of this motion, the Petitioner states as follows: *. Relevance and Necessity: I have evidence showing substantial payments made to Lisa Calderon, who also uses the alias Lisa Beganovic, through Apple Cash and Zelle, amounting to $*,*.*. This includes $*,* Naser sent to her attorney via Zelle: $*,* in March * and $*,* in April *. These payments are relevant to this case as they have affected and continue to affect Naser’s financial ability to support his three biological children’s well-being and needs. *. Attempts to Resolve: I sent an email to Naser and his attorney asking if Naser was willing to provide his girlfriend’s banking records to the judge. In response to my email request, I received an extremely abusive and threatening reply. The tone of the email was highly aggressive, confrontational, and disrespectful, clearly intended to intimidate and discourage me from pursuing my legal rights. This response confirms that Lisa Calderon is hiding Naser’s income, especially since they had no issue providing her credit card statements from Bank of America to the judge. Evidence of Fraudulent Transfers: I have Naser’s Chase bank records from * to *, which show Apple Cash payments from * through February *. Significant monthly expenditures continued until all Naser’s money disappeared. Frequent, consistent Zelle payments were made from * to *. Some of these bank statements were provided to the court on June *, *. All those transfers were and are being made with the intent to hide Naser’s money to avoid paying retroactive child support, the proper amount of child support, and education expenses. *. At the end of May *, all of Naser’s money disappeared from both of his Chase accounts. He then started falsely claiming that he is making $*,* less than he did in * and also started falsely claiming that Lisa Calderon is financially helping him. Coincidentally, that is also the same time Lisa Calderon quit her job and has been unemployed since *. *. In *, Naser again falsely claimed that he is making $*,* less than he did in *. *. Naser’s Chase bank statements reveal direct patterns of income concealment. The following instances serve as a few examples: a. On January *, *, Naser transferred $*.* via Zelle to Lisa Calderon from his second Chase account ending in *. On the same day, Lisa transferred the same amount to Naser’s first Chase account ending in *. Subsequently, Naser sent the same amount back to Lisa on the same day. b. On August *, *, Lisa Calderon sent $* via Zelle to Naser, which he then sent to me. c. June *, *: Naser deposited a check for $*,*.* from his second claim against NCR Corporation. d. July *, *: Naser withdrew a cashier’s check for $*,* made out to Lisa. e. On August *, *: Naser transferred $*,* from his first Chase account ending with * to his second Chase account ending with *. On the same day, he received $* via Zelle from Lisa Calderon and subsequently sent her back the $*, along with an additional $*. This is also meant to create the illusion that Lisa Calderon is financially helping Naser. *. Interference in the Case: Lisa Calderon has been and continues interfering in my children’s well-being and needs since July *, *, and in this case since January *, *, for her own benefit at my children’s expense. *. Legal Basis: Under Section *(a) of the Illinois Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (* ILCS */), any transfer made with the intent to defraud, hinder, or delay a creditor is prohibited. As the custodial parent, I am considered a creditor, and Naser is the debtor. *. Request for Subpoena: I request that this Honorable Court issue a subpoena to Huntington Bank to produce Lisa Calderon’s bank records of checking and savings accounts for the period of April *, *, to September *, *, to determine the extent of the fraudulent transfers and Naser’s hidden assets. I ask that this subpoena be issued only if there is a refusal to voluntarily provide these records to the Honorable Judge without a subpoena. *. In support of the motion, I’ve attached the following documents: Exhibit A: Emails written by Lisa Calderon, both as herself and impersonating Naser, along with two text messages from Naser, will help the court understand that all the emails are authored by Lisa Calderon, not Naser, clearly demonstrating her interference in this case and in the children’s well-being and needs. *. Naser’s Chase bank statements also clearly reveal Lisa Calderon’s interference with his finances. These statements show consistent Zelle payments made to her from both of his Chase accounts. His * and * Chase bank statements also revealed the amount of money that was going out of his account, ranging from ten to fifteen thousand dollars per month, while he’s been and continues to falsely claim to the court that Lisa Calderon is financially helping him because he does not make enough income, knowing she has been unemployed since *. This demonstrates that Lisa Calderon is hiding Naser’s money, interfering with his ability to support his three biological children for her benefit and her five sons, further proving her interference in this case and in the children’s well-being and needs. WHEREFORE, the Petitioner, Lula Korotkov, respectfully requests that this Honorable Court grant the relief sought herein: a. Order the respondent, Naser Beganovic, to provide the bank records of Lisa Calderon.for the specified period. b. Issue a subpoena for Lisa Calderon’s bank records from Huntington Bank. c. Grant any other relief that this Court deems just and proper. Respectfully Submitted, Lula Korotkov Lula Korotkov */*/* Lula Korotkov * N, Central Park Ave Chicago IL, * *-*-* Alisagiana@yahoo.com PRO SE PETITIONER’S VERIFICATION I, Lula Korotkov, acting Pro Se, under penalties as provided by law pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule * and Section *-* of the Code of Civil Procedure, certify that I have read the foregoing and within the motion. I further state that the allegations contained in the foregoing, and within the motion, are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. I further state that I have provided information which, to the best of my knowledge and belief, is true and correct. This motion is being filed with my consent and as part of my required duties in representing myself. I understand that by signing this verification, I am acknowledging that I am acting with my consent and at my direction and that I have based my actions and statements on the factual information provided by me. Lula Korotkov Pro Se Petitioner * N, Central Park Ave Chicago IL, * *-*-* Alisagiana@yahoo.com Lula Korotkov Lula Korotkov */*/*

So if I choose to file a complaint against this judge for these reasons, and also provide the actual documented evidence that I. provided to the judge, will it cause this judge and issue with the board? because the evidence is damning against the non custodial parent, which this judge overlooked all of that

I also plan to provide a copy. of the opposing parties, six page pretrial memorandum on which the judge made her ruling based on without a single documented evidence The entire memorandum was based on false misleading statements that were proven false with all the documents I provided. Would that also cause this judge and issue with the board?

What if I tell you that I'll? along with the pretrial memorandum, the opposing party, provided my father's bank statement falsely claiming that my father is paying for my mortgage when the were clearly my father's bank statements. That is not involved in this case. This judge made her rulings based on false information.

I just wanna know if all of this well. cause the board to investigate and question the judge asking her such questions as Why she did not one time during this case make her ruling based on actual documented evidence. or in the children's best interests. She did not even order the non custodial parent to cover college books or anything. He successfully evade it, pay ing the proper child support amount, said Evaded being ordered to pay retroactive child support from April *. *. he successfully evaded covering any college expenses or anything else that comes along with attending college. because all the judges rulings were based in the best interest of the non custodial parent without a single documented evidence.

Although my twin sons are now *. and my daughter is * I filed this case. when my twin sons were * and my daughter was * and it has been dragged on by the opposing party, since then and none of it was in favor of my children, none of it the court basically helped the non custodial parent evade all responsibilities and Get away with his head. ing his actual monthly income. by denying to order that a respondent to provide a girlfriend's records

I just wanna know. what all of this clearly and definitely cause an issue for this judge. causing her to be investigated and questioned. about her rulings. and why? she was overlooking the documented evidence. And why weren't my children's best interest important to this judge, especially being a child support judge?

So now I wanna know, how does the board investigate? a judge? or question the judge?

What do you mean questioning witnesses? I will be providing all the motions I have filed with this judge in her court, all the. court orders sign. ed by this judge. Ohh, the documented evidence. that I presented to this judge. I think that's more than enough evidence.

But that's what I'm asking you everything. that I have provided you to read and everything I stated that I will be provided, providing with the complete will it lead to discharge definitely being investigated and questioned

Now, in your opinion in your own opinion, do you not find that R that a child support judge? not once through this case, me, made her ruling based on the children, or their best interests, or their well being, or their educational needs. Overlooks retroactive, child support. Overlooks educational expenses.

I just want your help and help. ing me. phrase, clearly and directly that this judge had not once made a ruling based in the well being best interest or educational needs of my three children involved.

yes

If you can re read. My motion for reconsideration of denied. girlfriend, a girlfriend's records And please tell me. the statute was or rules that I stated in that motion. Are they relevant or not? In this case,

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT-DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION IN RE THE PARENTAGE OF: ) A.K., J.K., S.K., minor children, ) ) LULA KOROTKOV , ) Petitioner, ) ) No.: 2021D051242 and ) ) NASER BEGANOVIC, ) Respondent. ) MOTION TO RECONSIDER ORDER DENYING DISCOVERY OF RESPONDENT’S HIDDEN BANK ACCOUNT RECORDS FROM BANK OF AMERICA Now Comes the Petitioner, Lula Korotkov, pro se, pursuant to the Illinois Civil Code of Procedure, and respectfully moves this Honorable Court to reconsider its order dated August *, *, denying the Petitioner’s request for discovery of the Respondent’s bank records from the recently discovered hidden bank account at Bank of America. In support of this motion, Petitioner states as follows: *. This case involves ongoing child support proceedings aimed at ensuring accurate child support payments and full coverage of educational expenses in the best interest of my three children. I have diligently sought discovery of Naser’s financial records from his recently discovered second hidden bank account to ensure precise calculation of child support payments and comprehensive coverage of educational expenses. This is to guarantee that my three children receive the proper support they deserve for their well-being and educational needs. *. Being fully aware that Naser was earning under-the-table income and hiding his true monthly earnings, I persistently informed the court. I presented documented evidence demonstrating income cycling, diversion, and concealment, along with proof of inconsistencies in his financial explanations and documentation of the two known sources of his under-the-table income. Despite this, the evidence was dismissed as insufficient on June *, *. *. On June *, *, while at the Daily Center for our pretrial, I properly obtained a stamped subpoena from the circuit clerk, which I then served on Bank of America. *. On July *, *, I became aware that I did, in fact, find Naser’s second hidden bank account at Bank of America. *. As emphasized by Illinois statute and rules, in an ongoing civil case, especially a child support case pertaining to child support payments and full coverage of educational expenses, I have the right to obtain a subpoena from the circuit clerk for Naser’s hidden bank account records. *. The court's ruling, first made on July *, *, LULA is granted leave to issue a Subpoena Duces Tecum to the Bank of America conditioned on the following: a. Said Subpoena shall be returnable to the Court, thus, all the documents in response to the Subpoena shall be sent only to the Honorable Judge Aimen, Courtroom * of the Richard Daley Center, * W Washington St., Chicago, Illinois *; and b. LULA shall provide proper notice to NASER through counsel. and reiterated on August *, *, regarding granting LULA leave to file a subpoena to Bank of America with the following conditions, remains in full force and effect: a. Said subpoena shall be returnable to the court, thus, all the documents in response to the subpoena shall be sent only to the Honorable Judge Aimen, Courtroom * of the Richard Daley Center, * W Washington St., Chicago, Illinois *; and b. LULA shall provide proper notice to NASER through counsel. *. This ruling is in contradiction of Rule *(a), which generally allows for the issuance of subpoenas without needing the judge’s permission, ensuring transparency and review opportunities for the issuing party. The order breaches Rule *(a) by requiring the judge’s permission for a subpoena. *. Additionally, the order contradicts Rule *(b) by implying that I should notify the respondent and his attorney. The responsibility for notification generally lies with the bank, not with the issuing party. *. Furthermore, the order violates Rule *(a) by directing that bank records be sent only to the judge. This contradicts standard practice as per Rule *(a), which calls for transparency and review opportunities for the issuing party. *. I was supposed to receive these bank records on July *, *, to ensure that the child support calculations were based on Naser’s actual monthly income and to guarantee full coverage of educational expenses for the boys, prioritizing their well-being and educational needs. However, these court orders have only helped Naser evade his responsibility. *. Yesterday, August *, *, I spoke with the legal department at Bank of America and was informed that the subpoena for Naser’s hidden bank records has been stalled. They are unable to submit physical records to the court, as they have never encountered such a request in a child support case. *. I also spoke with an attorney who expressed concern about the judge’s orders. He pointed out that these orders seem to place an undue financial burden on the children while preventing me from accessing crucial financial information, as the primary goal of child support is to ensure the well-being and educational needs of the children are met. He also noted how unusual it was for a judge to order that the children apply for student loans while simultaneously denying access to relevant financial records. According to the attorney, these orders appear to be an attempt to prevent me from obtaining necessary financial information and place a financial burden on the children. This clearly indicates that the children’s welfare and educational needs are not being prioritized. He also stated that the children should not be applying for student loans before Naser’s actual income is determined. *. The court orders listed in Ms. Abellar’s drafted order dated August *, *, confirm the accuracy of what the attorney stated to me. *. It’s surprising that the court has overlooked the opposing party’s intentional efforts to deceive, create confusion, and stall the proceedings. They have distorted the judge’s order from June *, *, and secured an emergency order of protection in Kane County based on false and misleading claims. This was done to avoid submitting applications for the Parent PLUS loan, as Naser falsely claimed to have bad credit and to be sixty thousand dollars in debt. *. It’s surprising that this court has not noted that Naser is being investigated by the IRS for falsely claiming the children on his tax returns and manipulating his W2 forms. The same W2 forms that were justified by this court on June 27th, *. *. August *, *, was intended to be our continued pretrial from June *, *, for my motion for reconsideration of child support payments and the inclusion of Naser’s $*,*.* into his income. However, this did not occur. It was not even mentioned, nor is it referenced in Ms. Abellar’s drafted court order. Instead, the date became a hearing for the withdrawal of Ms. Abellar, which also did not happen, although it is mentioned in her drafted court order. *. The court should also note that Naser does, in fact, have the boys’ Social Security numbers on his old copies of his tax returns. It is concerning that this court accepts everything stated by Naser and his attorney without question and without any actual documented evidence. *. As both Ms. Abellar and Naser attempted to blame me for Naser’s failure to submit the Parent PLUS loan application. They falsely claimed that he couldn’t complete the application because I did not provide the boys’ Social Security numbers and school ID numbers. It was quite fascinating to watch their attempt to shift the blame onto me. as the court rules listed in his attorney’s drafted court order clearly demonstrates that Naser is the only one being prioritized. *. The court should also note that the only reason Naser suddenly wants access to school and medical records is because he has been falsely claiming that the children live with him and providing false school fee receipts to the IRS. This means Naser needs the children’s actual birth certificates, Social Security cards, and school enrollment records, which he does not have. The IRS is well aware that he does not have any of these documents in his possession. As I have previously stated, if he were to suddenly provide these documents to the IRS, they would know they were either falsified or illegally obtained. *. As shown in the attached documents, the intention is to impose further financial hardship on the children by forcing them to apply for student loans. This is also evidenced in the documents attached to my motion for clarification. The claim that he will pay *% of the expenses when the boys graduate in four years is false and will never happen. This burden will fall on the boys, as Naser has never been reliable and never will be. This is based on 17 years of experience. Unfortunately, this court is aiding him in achieving this goal. *. I am deeply concerned that the actions of this court have consistently favored the opposing party, to the detriment of my three children. This has led to a significant lack of trust in the court’s ability to prioritize the well-being and educational needs of my children. *. These are my children, and I will continue to fight for their well-being and best interests. *. According to * ILCS */* of the Illinois Compiled Statutes, the duty of support owed to children includes the obligation to provide for the reasonable and necessary physical, mental, and emotional health needs of the children. This statute emphasizes that child support should be based on the needs of the children. *. According to * ILCS */* of the Illinois Compiled Statutes, the court may award sums of money out of the property and income of either or both parties or the estate of a deceased parent, as equity may require, for the educational expenses of any children of the parties. Educational expenses may include, but are not limited to, tuition, fees, housing, medical expenses, reasonable living expenses during the academic year and periods of recess, and the cost of books and other supplies. *. In support of this motion, I have attached the following documents. Exhibit A: Contains an email I received on July *, *, that I forwarded to Ms. Abellar. A text message I received, also on July *, *, through the Talking Parents app. An email I sent to Ms. Abellar on August *, *, with pictures of the police reports. Exhibit B: Contains two text messages received through the Talking Parents app, one on August *, *, and the other on August *, *. WHEREFORE, the Petitioner, Lula Korotkov, respectfully requests that this Honorable Court: *. Reconsider its order dated August *, *, denying the Petitioner’s request for discovery of the Respondent’s bank records from the recently discovered hidden bank account at Bank of America. *. Order that the Respondent’s bank records from the hidden account at Bank of America be sent directly to the Petitioner. *. Ensure that the Respondent’s financial records are made available to the Petitioner to accurately calculate child support payments and ensure full coverage of educational expenses for the children. *. Provide any other relief that this Honorable Court deems just and equitable. Respectfully Submitted, Lula Korotkov Lula Korotkov */*/* Lula Korotkov * N, Central Park Ave Chicago IL, * *-*-* Alisagiana@yahoo.com PRO SE PETITIONERS’ VERIFICATION I, Lula Korotkov, acting Pro Se, under penalties as provided by law pursuant to Illinois Supreme Court Rule * and Section *-* of the Code of Civil Procedure, certify that I have read the foregoing and within the motion. I further state that the allegations contained in the foregoing, and within the motion, are true to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. I further state that I have provided information which, to the best of my knowledge and belief, is true and correct. This motion is being filed with my consent and as part of my required duties in representing myself. I understand that by signing this verification, I am acknowledging that I am acting with my consent and at my direction and that I have based my actions and statements on the factual information provided by me. Lula Korotkov Pro Se Petitioner * N, Central Park Ave Chicago IL, * *-*-* Alisagiana@yahoo.com Lula Korotkov Lula Korotkov */*/*

As this judge has been. keeping the non custodial parent and me on zoom Until she clears. Her entire courtroom, whoever is on zoom or in her. courtroom in person. and then states that the non custodial parent and I do not understand. how child support works Would you say after reading my motion and my sided rules or statue That I don't understand

Now I need yes or no answers from you to my questions. Is it child support? Judge, supposed to state verbally. that my twin sons should get. a job and cover their own college expenses while not ordering the non custodial parent to pay anything.

Is a child support judge supposed to verbally state and shrug her shoulders that everybody struggles and that there's nothing she can do? while making excuses? for the non custodial parents transfers to the girlfriend? that were clear in the non custodial parents bank statements provided her the judge was making excuses for those transactions.

Is a child support judge supposed to state? that she's banning me or keeping me from doing anymore discovery? to the non custodial parents income after that clear documented evidence was provided to her and denying to request a girlfriend's records.

And what will happen if I also mention all of this? in my complete