TRY ME!
Legal Document Exhibit Summary
Summary
The summary of exhibits includes a notice of an interim charging order, legal definitions affecting council tax, and case law emphasizing judicial oversight. It also covers statutory provisions like the Equality Act 2010 and Disability Discrimination Act 1995, highlighting discrimination and harassment claims. Additionally, it details financial and emotional impacts, reimbursement claims, and legal precedents on void orders. The exhibits support arguments against improper application of procedures and discrimination by the council.Full Conversation
is this correct: - The bulk processing approach without unique Court case numbers can lead to errors and unjust outcomes for defendants. It denies defendants the opportunity to have their cases individually reviewed and heard, compromising their legal, Lawful and human rights.
Yes, your statement is correct. It clearly explains the potential issues with bulk processing in the court system and its impact on defendants' rights. However, for clarity and consistency, consider using "lawful" with a lowercase 'l'. Here is a revised version:
- The bulk processing approach without unique court case numbers can lead to errors and unjust outcomes for defendants. It denies defendants the opportunity to have their cases individually reviewed and heard, compromising their legal, lawful, and human rights.
Does this address your concern?
- The bulk processing approach without unique court case numbers can lead to errors and unjust outcomes for defendants. It denies defendants the opportunity to have their cases individually reviewed and heard, compromising their legal, lawful, and human rights.
Does this address your concern?
is this correct: *. **Request for Judicial Review**
- I request the court to review the procedural errors and misapplication of the SJP. I emphasize the need for individual case assessment and proper judicial consideration for each defendant to ensure the correct procedure, fairness and justice.
Yes, your statement is correctly formatted and clearly conveys your request. Here it is with a minor adjustment for clarity:
---
*. **Request for Judicial Review**
- I request the court to review the procedural errors and misapplication of the SJP. I emphasize the need for individual case assessment and proper judicial consideration for each defendant to ensure correct procedure, fairness, and justice.
---
Is there anything else you need assistance with regarding your judicial review request?
---
*. **Request for Judicial Review**
- I request the court to review the procedural errors and misapplication of the SJP. I emphasize the need for individual case assessment and proper judicial consideration for each defendant to ensure correct procedure, fairness, and justice.
---
Is there anything else you need assistance with regarding your judicial review request?
is this correct: **Challenge to the Liability Order**
*. - I have requested detailed evidence laid with the Magistrates Court from the Claimants to substantiate the debt claimed, which has not been provided satisfactorily. This lack of evidence contravenes the principles set out in *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC **, wherein demands alone do not constitute definitive proof of debt (Exhibit GJT9).
Your statement is generally clear and well-structured. Here is a slightly revised version for improved readability and formality:
---
**Challenge to the Liability Order**
*. - I have requested detailed evidence from the Claimants, submitted to the Magistrates Court, to substantiate the debt claimed. This evidence has not been provided satisfactorily. This lack of evidence contravenes the principles set out in *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC **, wherein demands alone do not constitute definitive proof of debt (Exhibit GJT9).
---
Does this revision address your concerns?
---
**Challenge to the Liability Order**
*. - I have requested detailed evidence from the Claimants, submitted to the Magistrates Court, to substantiate the debt claimed. This evidence has not been provided satisfactorily. This lack of evidence contravenes the principles set out in *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC **, wherein demands alone do not constitute definitive proof of debt (Exhibit GJT9).
---
Does this revision address your concerns?
can you add anything to strengthen my position: *. **Property Classification and Reassessment Based on Case Law**
- Key points distinguishing "dwelling" and "dwelling-house":
- **Dwelling**:
- Defined for council tax purposes as properties used or suitable for use as residences.
- Governed by the Local Government Finance Act * (Exhibit GJT10).
- Supported by case law such as *R (on the application of Wilson) v. Coventry City Council [*] EWHC * (Admin)* (Exhibit GJT11).
- **Dwelling-house**:
- Defined more specifically as a 'home' where one resides with all essential facilities for day-to-day living.
- Clarified in *Uratemp Ventures Ltd v. Collins [*] UKHL ** (Exhibit GJT14).
To further strengthen your position, consider including a comparison of the practical implications of each classification, specifically how they relate to council tax assessments and liabilities:
---
*. **Property Classification and Reassessment Based on Case Law**
- Key points distinguishing "dwelling" and "dwelling-house":
- **Dwelling**:
- Defined for council tax purposes as properties used or suitable for use as residences.
- Governed by the Local Government Finance Act * (Exhibit GJT10).
- Supported by case law such as *R (on the application of Wilson) v. Coventry City Council [*] EWHC * (Admin)* (Exhibit GJT11).
- Implications: Subject to council tax based on general suitability for residence.
- **Dwelling-house**:
- Defined more specifically as a 'home' where one resides with all essential facilities for day-to-day living.
- Clarified in *Uratemp Ventures Ltd v. Collins [*] UKHL ** (Exhibit GJT14).
- Implications: May affect council tax liability based on actual residential use and facilities present.
---
Does this help clarify and strengthen your argument?
---
*. **Property Classification and Reassessment Based on Case Law**
- Key points distinguishing "dwelling" and "dwelling-house":
- **Dwelling**:
- Defined for council tax purposes as properties used or suitable for use as residences.
- Governed by the Local Government Finance Act * (Exhibit GJT10).
- Supported by case law such as *R (on the application of Wilson) v. Coventry City Council [*] EWHC * (Admin)* (Exhibit GJT11).
- Implications: Subject to council tax based on general suitability for residence.
- **Dwelling-house**:
- Defined more specifically as a 'home' where one resides with all essential facilities for day-to-day living.
- Clarified in *Uratemp Ventures Ltd v. Collins [*] UKHL ** (Exhibit GJT14).
- Implications: May affect council tax liability based on actual residential use and facilities present.
---
Does this help clarify and strengthen your argument?
can you strengthen this: **Improper Application of Single Justice Procedure (SJP) in Council Tax Cases**
- The use of SJP, designed for minor offences, is inappropriate for complex council tax matters requiring detailed judicial review.
- I highlight *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin ** to emphasize that council tax cases should not be dealt with under SJP due to their complexity and necessity for judicial oversight (Exhibit GJT16).
**Improper Application of Single Justice Procedure (SJP) in Council Tax Cases**
- The SJP, intended for minor offences, is unsuitable for complex council tax issues that demand comprehensive judicial review.
- Referencing *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin ** underscores the necessity for judicial oversight in council tax cases due to their complexity (Exhibit GJT16).
- The SJP, intended for minor offences, is unsuitable for complex council tax issues that demand comprehensive judicial review.
- Referencing *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin ** underscores the necessity for judicial oversight in council tax cases due to their complexity (Exhibit GJT16).
anything to strengthen this: *. **Disability Discrimination Act ***
- Doncaster Council's actions may constitute discrimination due to my health conditions as outlined in the Disability Discrimination Act * (Exhibit GJT19).
Certainly! Here is a strengthened version of your statement:
---
*. **Disability Discrimination Act ***
- Doncaster Council's actions may constitute discrimination due to my health conditions, contrary to the Disability Discrimination Act * (Exhibit GJT19).
- The Act mandates reasonable adjustments and prohibits any unfavourable treatment based on disability.
- Specific instances where the council failed to accommodate my health conditions highlight this breach.
---
Does this address your concern?
---
*. **Disability Discrimination Act ***
- Doncaster Council's actions may constitute discrimination due to my health conditions, contrary to the Disability Discrimination Act * (Exhibit GJT19).
- The Act mandates reasonable adjustments and prohibits any unfavourable treatment based on disability.
- Specific instances where the council failed to accommodate my health conditions highlight this breach.
---
Does this address your concern?
strengthen: **Equality Act ***
- **Indirect Discrimination**: By imposing fines and additional costs, the Council has applied a policy that disproportionately affects individuals with disabilities (Exhibit GJT21).
- **Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments**: Despite my disability and significant health issues causing financial difficulties, I have consistently paid arrears when possible. The Council has not adjusted their approach or offered aid to accommodate my health issues and financial difficulties (Exhibit GJT22).
- **Harassment**: Despite my repeated efforts to resolve these issues amicably, the Council has unfairly targeted me by adding unnecessary costs at every opportunity over the years, creating an intimidating and hostile environment (Exhibit GJT23).
Certainly! Here is a strengthened version of your statement under the Equality Act *:
---
**Equality Act ***
- **Indirect Discrimination**: The Council's imposition of fines and additional costs disproportionately affects individuals with disabilities, violating the principle of equal treatment (Exhibit GJT21).
- **Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments**: Despite my disability and significant health issues causing financial difficulties, I have consistently paid arrears when possible. The Council has failed to adjust their approach or offer aid to accommodate my health issues and financial difficulties, in breach of their duty to make reasonable adjustments (Exhibit GJT22).
- **Harassment**: The Council has unfairly targeted me by adding unnecessary costs at every opportunity over the years, despite my repeated efforts to resolve these issues amicably. This has created an intimidating and hostile environment, constituting harassment (Exhibit GJT23).
---
Does this address your concern?
---
**Equality Act ***
- **Indirect Discrimination**: The Council's imposition of fines and additional costs disproportionately affects individuals with disabilities, violating the principle of equal treatment (Exhibit GJT21).
- **Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments**: Despite my disability and significant health issues causing financial difficulties, I have consistently paid arrears when possible. The Council has failed to adjust their approach or offer aid to accommodate my health issues and financial difficulties, in breach of their duty to make reasonable adjustments (Exhibit GJT22).
- **Harassment**: The Council has unfairly targeted me by adding unnecessary costs at every opportunity over the years, despite my repeated efforts to resolve these issues amicably. This has created an intimidating and hostile environment, constituting harassment (Exhibit GJT23).
---
Does this address your concern?
strengthen: *. **Void Orders**
- According to *Shirley Lewald*, a Solicitor Advocate with Higher Rights (Civil and Criminal Courts), an 'ORDER' in court is void if made without jurisdiction, breaks the law, or ignores due process (Exhibit GJT24). This principle is supported by various case laws:
- *Anlaby v. Praetorius (*)*: A plaintiff has no right to obtain any judgment at all if the proceedings are void (Exhibit GJT25).
- *Crane v. Director of Public Prosecutions [*]*: If an order is void ab initio, there is no real order of the Court (Exhibit GJT26).
- *Craig v. Kanssen [*]*: An order which can properly be described as a nullity is something which the person affected by it is entitled ex debito justitiae to have set aside (Exhibit GJT27).
- *MacFoy v. United Africa Co. Ltd. [*]*: A void order is incurably void and all proceedings based on the invalid claim or void act are also void (Exhibit GJT28).
Certainly! Here is a strengthened version of your statement on void orders:
---
**Void Orders**
- According to *Shirley Lewald*, a Solicitor Advocate with Higher Rights (Civil and Criminal Courts), an 'ORDER' in court is void if made without jurisdiction, breaks the law, or ignores due process (Exhibit GJT24). This principle is reinforced by various case laws:
- *Anlaby v. Praetorius (*)*: A plaintiff has no right to obtain any judgment if the proceedings are void (Exhibit GJT25).
- *Crane v. Director of Public Prosecutions [*]*: If an order is void ab initio, it is not a real order of the Court (Exhibit GJT26).
- *Craig v. Kanssen [*]*: An order described as a nullity can be set aside as a right (Ex debito justitiae) by the affected person (Exhibit GJT27).
- *MacFoy v. United Africa Co. Ltd. [*]*: A void order is incurably void, rendering all subsequent proceedings based on the invalid claim or act void (Exhibit GJT28).
---
Does this address your
---
**Void Orders**
- According to *Shirley Lewald*, a Solicitor Advocate with Higher Rights (Civil and Criminal Courts), an 'ORDER' in court is void if made without jurisdiction, breaks the law, or ignores due process (Exhibit GJT24). This principle is reinforced by various case laws:
- *Anlaby v. Praetorius (*)*: A plaintiff has no right to obtain any judgment if the proceedings are void (Exhibit GJT25).
- *Crane v. Director of Public Prosecutions [*]*: If an order is void ab initio, it is not a real order of the Court (Exhibit GJT26).
- *Craig v. Kanssen [*]*: An order described as a nullity can be set aside as a right (Ex debito justitiae) by the affected person (Exhibit GJT27).
- *MacFoy v. United Africa Co. Ltd. [*]*: A void order is incurably void, rendering all subsequent proceedings based on the invalid claim or act void (Exhibit GJT28).
---
Does this address your
strengthen: *. **References to Case Law and Statutory Provisions**
- The council's actions contravene the principles established in *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC ** and the procedural requirements outlined in the *Local Government Finance Act ** (Exhibit GJT33).
- Their failure to consider my health conditions and financial difficulties breaches the *Equality Act ** and the *Disability Discrimination Act ** (Exhibit GJT34).
Certainly! Here is a strengthened version of your statement on case law and statutory provisions:
---
*. **References to Case Law and Statutory Provisions**
- The council's actions contravene the principles established in *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC ** and fail to adhere to the procedural requirements outlined in the *Local Government Finance Act ** (Exhibit GJT33).
- Their failure to consider my health conditions and financial difficulties constitutes a breach of the *Equality Act ** and the *Disability Discrimination Act ** (Exhibit GJT34). These statutes mandate the consideration of individual circumstances and reasonable adjustments to prevent discrimination.
---
Does this address your concern?
---
*. **References to Case Law and Statutory Provisions**
- The council's actions contravene the principles established in *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC ** and fail to adhere to the procedural requirements outlined in the *Local Government Finance Act ** (Exhibit GJT33).
- Their failure to consider my health conditions and financial difficulties constitutes a breach of the *Equality Act ** and the *Disability Discrimination Act ** (Exhibit GJT34). These statutes mandate the consideration of individual circumstances and reasonable adjustments to prevent discrimination.
---
Does this address your concern?
strengthen: *. **Improper Application of Single Justice Procedure**
- The improper application of the Single Justice Procedure is highlighted in the cases of *Northern Trains Ltd v. Mark Ballington & Jade Wylie [*] EWHC*, *Northern Trains Ltd v. Sarah Cooke [*] EWHC*, and *Greater Anglian v. Joshua Baggaley, Paul Jenkins & Sarah McKenzie [*] EWHC* (Exhibit GJT35).
Certainly! Here is a strengthened version of your statement on the improper application of the Single Justice Procedure:
---
*. **Improper Application of Single Justice Procedure (SJP)**
- The misuse of the Single Justice Procedure (SJP) is evidenced in recent cases such as *Northern Trains Ltd v. Mark Ballington & Jade Wylie [*] EWHC*, *Northern Trains Ltd v. Sarah Cooke [*] EWHC*, and *Greater Anglian v. Joshua Baggaley, Paul Jenkins & Sarah McKenzie [*] EWHC* (Exhibit GJT35).
- These cases illustrate the SJP's unsuitability for complex matters requiring detailed judicial scrutiny and individual case consideration.
---
Does this address your concern?
---
*. **Improper Application of Single Justice Procedure (SJP)**
- The misuse of the Single Justice Procedure (SJP) is evidenced in recent cases such as *Northern Trains Ltd v. Mark Ballington & Jade Wylie [*] EWHC*, *Northern Trains Ltd v. Sarah Cooke [*] EWHC*, and *Greater Anglian v. Joshua Baggaley, Paul Jenkins & Sarah McKenzie [*] EWHC* (Exhibit GJT35).
- These cases illustrate the SJP's unsuitability for complex matters requiring detailed judicial scrutiny and individual case consideration.
---
Does this address your concern?
strengthen: *. **Conclusion**
- Based on the procedural improprieties, discriminatory actions, and the improper application of the Single Justice Procedure, I respectfully request that the court:
- Dismiss the application for an interim charging order.
- Award compensation for financial losses, emotional distress, and legal costs as detailed above.
- Consider the legal precedents and the evidence provided in support of my claims.
Certainly! Here is a strengthened version of your conclusion:
---
**Conclusion**
- Based on the procedural improprieties, discriminatory actions, and improper application of the Single Justice Procedure, I respectfully request that the court:
- Dismiss the application for an interim charging order.
- Award compensation for financial losses, emotional distress, and legal costs as detailed above.
- Consider the legal precedents and the presented evidence in support of my claims.
---
Does this address your concern?
---
**Conclusion**
- Based on the procedural improprieties, discriminatory actions, and improper application of the Single Justice Procedure, I respectfully request that the court:
- Dismiss the application for an interim charging order.
- Award compensation for financial losses, emotional distress, and legal costs as detailed above.
- Consider the legal precedents and the presented evidence in support of my claims.
---
Does this address your concern?
strengthen: *. **Events and Personal Impact**
- On * November *, I received notice of an interim charging order dated * October * issued by the council, based on a bulk list extract of liability enclosed in a letter dated * October * (Exhibit GJT1).
- I oppose the Claimant's application for the unlawful interim charging order on my personal property where I reside. My property is legally defined as a Dwelling-House under Halsbury's Laws, not the broad term "dwelling" as used in the Local Government Finance Act * (Exhibit GJT2).
Certainly! Here is a strengthened version of your statement on events and personal impact:
---
**Events and Personal Impact**
- On * November *, I received notice of an interim charging order dated * October * issued by the council, based on a bulk list extract of liability enclosed in a letter dated * October * (Exhibit GJT1).
- I oppose the Claimant's application for the unlawful interim charging order on my personal property where I reside. My property is legally defined as a Dwelling-House under Halsbury's Laws, which is distinct from the broad term "dwelling" as used in the Local Government Finance Act * (Exhibit GJT2). This distinction is critical as it affects the applicability and enforcement of the charging order under the relevant legal definitions.
---
Does this address your concern?
---
**Events and Personal Impact**
- On * November *, I received notice of an interim charging order dated * October * issued by the council, based on a bulk list extract of liability enclosed in a letter dated * October * (Exhibit GJT1).
- I oppose the Claimant's application for the unlawful interim charging order on my personal property where I reside. My property is legally defined as a Dwelling-House under Halsbury's Laws, which is distinct from the broad term "dwelling" as used in the Local Government Finance Act * (Exhibit GJT2). This distinction is critical as it affects the applicability and enforcement of the charging order under the relevant legal definitions.
---
Does this address your concern?
what do i need to enclose with the n244 form
To ensure your N244 form is complete, you should enclose the following documents:
- **Witness Statement**: Clearly detailing your case and any necessary evidence.
- **Supporting Documents**: Any exhibits referenced in your witness statement (e.g., Exhibit GJT1, GJT2).
- **Draft Order**: A proposed order for the court to consider.
- **Fee Payment**: The applicable court fee or a fee exemption form if you are eligible for fee remission.
Is there anything specific you need more information on?
- **Witness Statement**: Clearly detailing your case and any necessary evidence.
- **Supporting Documents**: Any exhibits referenced in your witness statement (e.g., Exhibit GJT1, GJT2).
- **Draft Order**: A proposed order for the court to consider.
- **Fee Payment**: The applicable court fee or a fee exemption form if you are eligible for fee remission.
Is there anything specific you need more information on?
do i have to include all the caselaw as some are very large files
You do not need to include the full text of all case law documents. Instead, you can:
- Provide key extracts or relevant sections of the case law.
- Include a summary or brief explanation of how each case supports your argument.
- Reference the full case law with proper citation if the court needs to review it in detail.
Would you like guidance on summarizing specific case law?
- Provide key extracts or relevant sections of the case law.
- Include a summary or brief explanation of how each case supports your argument.
- Reference the full case law with proper citation if the court needs to review it in detail.
Would you like guidance on summarizing specific case law?
case you help with the key extracts summery or brief explanation: *. **List of Exhibits**
- **Exhibit GJT1: Notice of interim charging order dated * October *.
- **Exhibit GJT2**: Definition of "Dwelling-House" under Halsbury's Laws and the Local Government Finance Act *.
- **Exhibit GJT3**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **.
- **Exhibit GJT4**: Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
- **Exhibit GJT5**: Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
- **Exhibit GJT6**: Schedule extract of liability from * July *.
- **Exhibit GJT7**: Schedule liability order extract issued on * July *.
- **Exhibit GJT8**: Unlawful schedule liability order issued on * July *.
- **Exhibit GJT9**: *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC **.
- **Exhibit GJT10**: Local Government Finance Act *.
- **Exhibit GJT11**: *R (on the application of Wilson) v. Coventry City Council [*] EWHC * (Admin)*.
- **Exhibit GJT12**: *R (on the application of East Sussex County Council) v. Roberts [*] EWCA Civ **.
- **Exhibit GJT13**: *R (on the application of Williams) v. Horsham District Council [*] EWHC * (Admin)*.
- **Exhibit GJT14**: *Uratemp Ventures Ltd v. Collins [*] UKHL **.
- **Exhibit GJT15**: Evidence of consistent council tax payments despite health challenges.
- **Exhibit GJT16**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **.
- **Exhibit GJT17**: *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC **.
- **Exhibit GJT18**: Article * of the Human Rights Act *.
- **Exhibit GJT19**: Disability Discrimination Act *. - **
- **Exhibit GJT20**: Equality Act * - Direct Discrimination.
- **Exhibit GJT21**: Equality Act * - Indirect Discrimination.
- **Exhibit GJT22**: Equality Act * - Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments.
- **Exhibit GJT23**: Equality Act * - Harassment.
- **Exhibit GJT24**: Statement by Shirley Lewald, Solicitor Advocate.
- **Exhibit GJT25**: *Anlaby v. Praetorius (*)*.
- **Exhibit GJT26**: *Crane v. Director of Public Prosecutions [*]*.
- **Exhibit GJT27**: *Craig v. Kanssen [*]*.
- **Exhibit GJT28**: *MacFoy v. United Africa Co. Ltd. [*]*.
- **Exhibit GJT29**: Compensation for financial losses.
- **Exhibit GJT30**: Compensation for emotional distress and mental health impact.
- **Exhibit GJT31**: Reimbursement of legal costs.
- **Exhibit GJT32**: Full reimbursement of council tax payments.
- **Exhibit GJT33**: *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC ** and Local Government Finance Act *.
- **Exhibit GJT34**: Equality Act * and Disability Discrimination Act *.
- **Exhibit GJT35**: *Northern Trains Ltd v. Mark Ballington & Jade Wylie [*] EWHC*.
This completes the list of exhibits for the witness statement.
Certainly! Here are brief explanations for each exhibit, which you can use as key extracts for your summary:
*. **Exhibit GJT1**: Notice of interim charging order dated * October *.
- This is the formal notice received regarding an interim charging order placed on the property.
*. **Exhibit GJT2**: Definition of "Dwelling-House" under Halsbury's Laws and the Local Government Finance Act *.
- Provides the legal definition and distinction of a "Dwelling-House" affecting council tax implications.
*. **Exhibit GJT3**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **.
- Case emphasizing the need for judicial oversight in complex cases rather than using summary procedures.
*. **Exhibit GJT4**: Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
- Details of the liability order issued by the court on the specified date.
*. **Exhibit GJT5**: Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
- Additional information provided on the reverse side of the liability order.
*. **Exhibit GJT6**
*. **Exhibit GJT1**: Notice of interim charging order dated * October *.
- This is the formal notice received regarding an interim charging order placed on the property.
*. **Exhibit GJT2**: Definition of "Dwelling-House" under Halsbury's Laws and the Local Government Finance Act *.
- Provides the legal definition and distinction of a "Dwelling-House" affecting council tax implications.
*. **Exhibit GJT3**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **.
- Case emphasizing the need for judicial oversight in complex cases rather than using summary procedures.
*. **Exhibit GJT4**: Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
- Details of the liability order issued by the court on the specified date.
*. **Exhibit GJT5**: Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
- Additional information provided on the reverse side of the liability order.
*. **Exhibit GJT6**
Carry on from *.
Certainly! Here are the remaining brief explanations for each exhibit:
*. **Exhibit GJT6**: Schedule extract of liability from * July *.
- Details of the liability listed for council tax as of the specified date.
*. **Exhibit GJT7**: Schedule liability order extract issued on * July *.
- Extract of the order detailing the council tax liability issued on the specified date.
*. **Exhibit GJT8**: Unlawful schedule liability order issued on * July *.
- Documentation showing the issuance of a liability order that is claimed to be unlawful.
*. **Exhibit GJT9**: *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC **.
- Case highlighting that demands alone do not constitute definitive proof of debt.
*. **Exhibit GJT10**: Local Government Finance Act *.
- Statutory provisions governing council tax.
*. **Exhibit GJT11**: *R (on the application of Wilson) v. Coventry City Council [*] EWHC * (Admin)*.
- Case supporting the definition of "dwelling" for council tax purposes.
*. **Exhibit GJT6**: Schedule extract of liability from * July *.
- Details of the liability listed for council tax as of the specified date.
*. **Exhibit GJT7**: Schedule liability order extract issued on * July *.
- Extract of the order detailing the council tax liability issued on the specified date.
*. **Exhibit GJT8**: Unlawful schedule liability order issued on * July *.
- Documentation showing the issuance of a liability order that is claimed to be unlawful.
*. **Exhibit GJT9**: *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC **.
- Case highlighting that demands alone do not constitute definitive proof of debt.
*. **Exhibit GJT10**: Local Government Finance Act *.
- Statutory provisions governing council tax.
*. **Exhibit GJT11**: *R (on the application of Wilson) v. Coventry City Council [*] EWHC * (Admin)*.
- Case supporting the definition of "dwelling" for council tax purposes.
carry on from *.
Certainly! Here are the remaining brief explanations for each exhibit:
*. **Exhibit GJT12**: *R (on the application of East Sussex County Council) v. Roberts [*] EWCA Civ **.
- Case emphasizing the importance of proper procedural adherence in council tax matters.
*. **Exhibit GJT13**: *R (on the application of Williams) v. Horsham District Council [*] EWHC * (Admin)*.
- Case discussing the requirements for fair and transparent council tax assessments.
*. **Exhibit GJT14**: *Uratemp Ventures Ltd v. Collins [*] UKHL **.
- Case defining "Dwelling-House" and its implications for residential use.
*. **Exhibit GJT15**: Evidence of consistent council tax payments despite health challenges.
- Documentation showing regular payments made towards council tax, demonstrating efforts to comply despite health issues.
*. **Exhibit GJT16**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **.
- Case reinforcing the need for proper judicial oversight in complex council tax matters.
*. **Exhibit G
*. **Exhibit GJT12**: *R (on the application of East Sussex County Council) v. Roberts [*] EWCA Civ **.
- Case emphasizing the importance of proper procedural adherence in council tax matters.
*. **Exhibit GJT13**: *R (on the application of Williams) v. Horsham District Council [*] EWHC * (Admin)*.
- Case discussing the requirements for fair and transparent council tax assessments.
*. **Exhibit GJT14**: *Uratemp Ventures Ltd v. Collins [*] UKHL **.
- Case defining "Dwelling-House" and its implications for residential use.
*. **Exhibit GJT15**: Evidence of consistent council tax payments despite health challenges.
- Documentation showing regular payments made towards council tax, demonstrating efforts to comply despite health issues.
*. **Exhibit GJT16**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **.
- Case reinforcing the need for proper judicial oversight in complex council tax matters.
*. **Exhibit G
carry on from *.
Certainly! Here are the remaining brief explanations for each exhibit:
*. **Exhibit GJT17**: *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC **.
- Case emphasizing that demands alone do not constitute definitive proof of debt.
*. **Exhibit GJT18**: Article * of the Human Rights Act *.
- Provision ensuring the right to respect for private and family life, home, and correspondence.
*. **Exhibit GJT19**: Disability Discrimination Act *.
- Statute prohibiting discrimination based on disability and mandating reasonable adjustments.
*. **Exhibit GJT20**: Equality Act * - Direct Discrimination.
- Legal provision addressing direct discrimination against individuals with protected characteristics.
*. **Exhibit GJT21**: Equality Act * - Indirect Discrimination.
- Legal provision addressing policies that disproportionately affect individuals with protected characteristics.
*. **Exhibit GJT22**: Equality Act * - Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments.
- Statutory requirement for making adjustments to accommodate individuals with disabilities.
*. **Exhibit GJT23**: Equality Act * - Harassment.
*. **Exhibit GJT17**: *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC **.
- Case emphasizing that demands alone do not constitute definitive proof of debt.
*. **Exhibit GJT18**: Article * of the Human Rights Act *.
- Provision ensuring the right to respect for private and family life, home, and correspondence.
*. **Exhibit GJT19**: Disability Discrimination Act *.
- Statute prohibiting discrimination based on disability and mandating reasonable adjustments.
*. **Exhibit GJT20**: Equality Act * - Direct Discrimination.
- Legal provision addressing direct discrimination against individuals with protected characteristics.
*. **Exhibit GJT21**: Equality Act * - Indirect Discrimination.
- Legal provision addressing policies that disproportionately affect individuals with protected characteristics.
*. **Exhibit GJT22**: Equality Act * - Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments.
- Statutory requirement for making adjustments to accommodate individuals with disabilities.
*. **Exhibit GJT23**: Equality Act * - Harassment.
carry on from *.
Certainly! Here are the remaining brief explanations for each exhibit:
*. **Exhibit GJT23**: Equality Act * - Harassment.
- Provision addressing harassment based on protected characteristics, creating an intimidating or hostile environment.
*. **Exhibit GJT24**: Statement by Shirley Lewald, Solicitor Advocate.
- Legal opinion on the void nature of court orders made without jurisdiction or due process.
*. **Exhibit GJT25**: *Anlaby v. Praetorius (*)*.
- Case establishing the principle that void proceedings cannot result in a valid judgment.
*. **Exhibit GJT26**: *Crane v. Director of Public Prosecutions [*]*.
- Case stating that an order void ab initio is not a real order of the court.
*. **Exhibit GJT27**: *Craig v. Kanssen [*]*.
- Case explaining that an order described as a nullity can be set aside by the affected person.
*. **Exhibit GJT28**: *MacFoy v. United Africa Co. Ltd. [*]*.
- Case highlighting that a void order is incurably void, affecting all
*. **Exhibit GJT23**: Equality Act * - Harassment.
- Provision addressing harassment based on protected characteristics, creating an intimidating or hostile environment.
*. **Exhibit GJT24**: Statement by Shirley Lewald, Solicitor Advocate.
- Legal opinion on the void nature of court orders made without jurisdiction or due process.
*. **Exhibit GJT25**: *Anlaby v. Praetorius (*)*.
- Case establishing the principle that void proceedings cannot result in a valid judgment.
*. **Exhibit GJT26**: *Crane v. Director of Public Prosecutions [*]*.
- Case stating that an order void ab initio is not a real order of the court.
*. **Exhibit GJT27**: *Craig v. Kanssen [*]*.
- Case explaining that an order described as a nullity can be set aside by the affected person.
*. **Exhibit GJT28**: *MacFoy v. United Africa Co. Ltd. [*]*.
- Case highlighting that a void order is incurably void, affecting all
carry on from *.
Certainly! Here are the remaining brief explanations for each exhibit:
*. **Exhibit GJT28**: *MacFoy v. United Africa Co. Ltd. [*]*.
- Case highlighting that a void order is incurably void, affecting all subsequent proceedings based on it.
*. **Exhibit GJT29**: Compensation for financial losses.
- Documentation detailing financial losses incurred due to the council's actions.
*. **Exhibit GJT30**: Compensation for emotional distress and mental health impact.
- Evidence of emotional distress and mental health impact caused by the council's actions.
*. **Exhibit GJT31**: Reimbursement of legal costs.
- Records of legal costs incurred due to the council's actions, seeking reimbursement.
*. **Exhibit GJT32**: Full reimbursement of council tax payments.
- Documentation supporting the claim for reimbursement of council tax payments made.
*. **Exhibit GJT33**: *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC ** and Local Government Finance Act *.
- Case and statute highlighting procedural requirements and principles relevant to council tax matters.
*. **Exhibit GJT34**: Equality Act * and
*. **Exhibit GJT28**: *MacFoy v. United Africa Co. Ltd. [*]*.
- Case highlighting that a void order is incurably void, affecting all subsequent proceedings based on it.
*. **Exhibit GJT29**: Compensation for financial losses.
- Documentation detailing financial losses incurred due to the council's actions.
*. **Exhibit GJT30**: Compensation for emotional distress and mental health impact.
- Evidence of emotional distress and mental health impact caused by the council's actions.
*. **Exhibit GJT31**: Reimbursement of legal costs.
- Records of legal costs incurred due to the council's actions, seeking reimbursement.
*. **Exhibit GJT32**: Full reimbursement of council tax payments.
- Documentation supporting the claim for reimbursement of council tax payments made.
*. **Exhibit GJT33**: *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC ** and Local Government Finance Act *.
- Case and statute highlighting procedural requirements and principles relevant to council tax matters.
*. **Exhibit GJT34**: Equality Act * and
carry on from *.
Certainly! Here are the remaining brief explanations for each exhibit:
*. **Exhibit GJT34**: Equality Act * and Disability Discrimination Act *.
- Statutes mandating consideration of individual circumstances and reasonable adjustments to prevent discrimination.
*. **Exhibit GJT35**: *Northern Trains Ltd v. Mark Ballington & Jade Wylie [*] EWHC*.
- Case illustrating the improper application of the Single Justice Procedure in complex matters requiring judicial scrutiny.
Does this complete your list of exhibits and address your concerns?
*. **Exhibit GJT34**: Equality Act * and Disability Discrimination Act *.
- Statutes mandating consideration of individual circumstances and reasonable adjustments to prevent discrimination.
*. **Exhibit GJT35**: *Northern Trains Ltd v. Mark Ballington & Jade Wylie [*] EWHC*.
- Case illustrating the improper application of the Single Justice Procedure in complex matters requiring judicial scrutiny.
Does this complete your list of exhibits and address your concerns?
what summery after these exhibits do i need to right
Based on the provided exhibits, you should write a summary that concisely outlines the key points of your argument and the supporting evidence. Here is an example summary:
---
**Summary of Exhibits**
*. **Improper Interim Charging Order**: Exhibit GJT1 details the notice of an interim charging order, which I oppose due to its unlawful application on my property (Exhibit GJT2).
*. **Judicial Oversight Requirement**: Exhibit GJT3 emphasizes the necessity for judicial oversight in complex council tax matters, which were improperly handled using the Single Justice Procedure (Exhibit GJT35).
*. **Procedural and Legal Breaches**: The council's actions contravene established legal principles (Exhibit GJT9, GJT33) and statutory requirements (Exhibit GJT10).
*. **Discrimination and Harassment**: The council failed to accommodate my health conditions, breaching the Equality Act * and Disability Discrimination Act * (Exhibits GJT19, GJT34). Their actions constitute harassment (Exhibit GJT23).
*. **Void Orders**: Exhibits GJT24-GJT28 provide legal precedents demonstrating that orders made without jurisdiction or due process are void.
*.
---
**Summary of Exhibits**
*. **Improper Interim Charging Order**: Exhibit GJT1 details the notice of an interim charging order, which I oppose due to its unlawful application on my property (Exhibit GJT2).
*. **Judicial Oversight Requirement**: Exhibit GJT3 emphasizes the necessity for judicial oversight in complex council tax matters, which were improperly handled using the Single Justice Procedure (Exhibit GJT35).
*. **Procedural and Legal Breaches**: The council's actions contravene established legal principles (Exhibit GJT9, GJT33) and statutory requirements (Exhibit GJT10).
*. **Discrimination and Harassment**: The council failed to accommodate my health conditions, breaching the Equality Act * and Disability Discrimination Act * (Exhibits GJT19, GJT34). Their actions constitute harassment (Exhibit GJT23).
*. **Void Orders**: Exhibits GJT24-GJT28 provide legal precedents demonstrating that orders made without jurisdiction or due process are void.
*.
carry on from *.
Certainly! Here is the continuation of the summary:
*. **Financial and Emotional Impact**: Exhibits GJT29 and GJT30 document the financial losses and emotional distress caused by the council's actions.
*. **Reimbursement Claims**: Exhibits GJT31 and GJT32 provide evidence supporting the claim for reimbursement of legal costs and council tax payments.
*. **Support for Legal Definitions**: Exhibits GJT11, GJT13, and GJT14 support the legal definitions and distinctions critical to my case, particularly regarding the definition of "Dwelling-House" versus "Dwelling".
---
Does this summary address your concern?
*. **Financial and Emotional Impact**: Exhibits GJT29 and GJT30 document the financial losses and emotional distress caused by the council's actions.
*. **Reimbursement Claims**: Exhibits GJT31 and GJT32 provide evidence supporting the claim for reimbursement of legal costs and council tax payments.
*. **Support for Legal Definitions**: Exhibits GJT11, GJT13, and GJT14 support the legal definitions and distinctions critical to my case, particularly regarding the definition of "Dwelling-House" versus "Dwelling".
---
Does this summary address your concern?
is anything else required
Your summary and exhibits list are comprehensive and well-structured. To ensure completeness, please consider the following additional elements:
*. **Cover Letter**: A brief cover letter explaining the purpose of your submission and listing the enclosed documents.
*. **Index of Exhibits**: A table of contents for quick reference to your exhibits.
*. **Witness Statement**: Ensure it clearly ties each exhibit to your argument points.
*. **Draft Order**: A proposed court order outlining the relief you seek.
If you need any specific guidance on these elements, please let me know!
*. **Cover Letter**: A brief cover letter explaining the purpose of your submission and listing the enclosed documents.
*. **Index of Exhibits**: A table of contents for quick reference to your exhibits.
*. **Witness Statement**: Ensure it clearly ties each exhibit to your argument points.
*. **Draft Order**: A proposed court order outlining the relief you seek.
If you need any specific guidance on these elements, please let me know!
please help with this
Certainly! Here are templates and examples to help you with the additional elements:
Cover Letter
---
**[Your Name]**
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
**To:**
The Court Manager
[Name of the Court]
[Address of the Court]
[City, Postcode]
**Subject:** Submission of N244 Form and Supporting Documents
Dear Sir/Madam,
Please find enclosed the following documents in support of my application using Form N244:
*. Completed N244 Form
*. Witness Statement
*. List of Exhibits
*. Index of Exhibits
*. Draft Order
*. Court Fee Payment/Fee Exemption Form (if applicable)
I respectfully request the court to consider the enclosed materials in support of my application.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
---
**[Your Name]**
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
**To:**
The Court Manager
[Name of the Court]
[Address of the Court]
[City, Postcode]
**Subject:** Submission of N244 Form and Supporting Documents
Dear Sir/Madam,
Please find enclosed the following documents in support of my application using Form N244:
*. Completed N244 Form
*. Witness Statement
*. List of Exhibits
*. Index of Exhibits
*. Draft Order
*. Court Fee Payment/Fee Exemption Form (if applicable)
I respectfully request the court to consider the enclosed materials in support of my application.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Yours faithfully,
[Your Name]
---
Index of Exhibits
---
**Index of Exhibits**
| Exhibit No. | Description |
|-------------|-------------|
| GJT1 | Notice of interim charging order dated * October * |
| GJT2 | Definition of "Dwelling-House" under Halsbury's Laws and
---
**Index of Exhibits**
| Exhibit No. | Description |
|-------------|-------------|
| GJT1 | Notice of interim charging order dated * October * |
| GJT2 | Definition of "Dwelling-House" under Halsbury's Laws and
carry on from : Halsbury's Laws and
---
**Index of Exhibits**
| Exhibit No. | Description |
|-------------|-------------|
| GJT1 | Notice of interim charging order dated * October * |
| GJT2 | Definition of "Dwelling-House" under Halsbury's Laws and the Local Government Finance Act * |
| GJT3 | *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin ** |
| GJT4 | Schedule liability Order dated * July * |
| GJT5 | Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule liability Order dated * July * |
| GJT6 | Schedule extract of liability from * July * |
| GJT7 | Schedule liability order extract issued on * July * |
| GJT8 | Unlawful schedule liability order issued on * July * |
| GJT9 | *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC ** |
| GJT10 | Local Government Finance Act * |
| GJT11 | *R (
**Index of Exhibits**
| Exhibit No. | Description |
|-------------|-------------|
| GJT1 | Notice of interim charging order dated * October * |
| GJT2 | Definition of "Dwelling-House" under Halsbury's Laws and the Local Government Finance Act * |
| GJT3 | *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin ** |
| GJT4 | Schedule liability Order dated * July * |
| GJT5 | Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule liability Order dated * July * |
| GJT6 | Schedule extract of liability from * July * |
| GJT7 | Schedule liability order extract issued on * July * |
| GJT8 | Unlawful schedule liability order issued on * July * |
| GJT9 | *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC ** |
| GJT10 | Local Government Finance Act * |
| GJT11 | *R (
carry on from gjt11
Certainly! Here are the remaining items for the index of exhibits:
---
**Index of Exhibits**
| Exhibit No. | Description |
|-------------|-------------|
| GJT1 | Notice of interim charging order dated * October * |
| GJT2 | Definition of "Dwelling-House" under Halsbury's Laws and the Local Government Finance Act * |
| GJT3 | *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin ** |
| GJT4 | Schedule liability Order dated * July * |
| GJT5 | Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule liability Order dated * July * |
| GJT6 | Schedule extract of liability from * July * |
| GJT7 | Schedule liability order extract issued on * July * |
| GJT8 | Unlawful schedule liability order issued on * July * |
| GJT9 | *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC ** |
| GJT10 | Local Government Finance Act
---
**Index of Exhibits**
| Exhibit No. | Description |
|-------------|-------------|
| GJT1 | Notice of interim charging order dated * October * |
| GJT2 | Definition of "Dwelling-House" under Halsbury's Laws and the Local Government Finance Act * |
| GJT3 | *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin ** |
| GJT4 | Schedule liability Order dated * July * |
| GJT5 | Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule liability Order dated * July * |
| GJT6 | Schedule extract of liability from * July * |
| GJT7 | Schedule liability order extract issued on * July * |
| GJT8 | Unlawful schedule liability order issued on * July * |
| GJT9 | *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC ** |
| GJT10 | Local Government Finance Act
carry on from | GJT10 | Local Government Finance Act
Certainly! Here are the remaining items for the index of exhibits:
---
**Index of Exhibits**
| Exhibit No. | Description |
|-------------|-------------|
| GJT1 | Notice of interim charging order dated * October * |
| GJT2 | Definition of "Dwelling-House" under Halsbury's Laws and the Local Government Finance Act * |
| GJT3 | *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin ** |
| GJT4 | Schedule liability Order dated * July * |
| GJT5 | Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule liability Order dated * July * |
| GJT6 | Schedule extract of liability from * July * |
| GJT7 | Schedule liability order extract issued on * July * |
| GJT8 | Unlawful schedule liability order issued on * July * |
| GJT9 | *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC ** |
| GJT10 | Local Government Finance Act * |
| GJT11 | *R (on
---
**Index of Exhibits**
| Exhibit No. | Description |
|-------------|-------------|
| GJT1 | Notice of interim charging order dated * October * |
| GJT2 | Definition of "Dwelling-House" under Halsbury's Laws and the Local Government Finance Act * |
| GJT3 | *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin ** |
| GJT4 | Schedule liability Order dated * July * |
| GJT5 | Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule liability Order dated * July * |
| GJT6 | Schedule extract of liability from * July * |
| GJT7 | Schedule liability order extract issued on * July * |
| GJT8 | Unlawful schedule liability order issued on * July * |
| GJT9 | *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC ** |
| GJT10 | Local Government Finance Act * |
| GJT11 | *R (on
do i put the list of exhibits or just a summery list at end of the statement
You should include a summary list of the exhibits at the end of your statement, providing brief descriptions of each exhibit. This helps the court quickly understand the relevance of each document without needing to read through lengthy files. Here's an example of how to format it:
---
**List of Exhibits**
*. **Exhibit GJT1**: Notice of interim charging order dated * October *.
*. **Exhibit GJT2**: Definition of "Dwelling-House" under Halsbury's Laws and the Local Government Finance Act *.
*. **Exhibit GJT3**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **.
*. **Exhibit GJT4**: Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
*. **Exhibit GJT5**: Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
*. **Exhibit GJT6**: Schedule extract of liability from * July *.
*. **Exhibit GJT7**: Schedule liability order extract issued on * July *.
*. **Exhibit GJT8**: Unlawful schedule
---
**List of Exhibits**
*. **Exhibit GJT1**: Notice of interim charging order dated * October *.
*. **Exhibit GJT2**: Definition of "Dwelling-House" under Halsbury's Laws and the Local Government Finance Act *.
*. **Exhibit GJT3**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **.
*. **Exhibit GJT4**: Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
*. **Exhibit GJT5**: Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
*. **Exhibit GJT6**: Schedule extract of liability from * July *.
*. **Exhibit GJT7**: Schedule liability order extract issued on * July *.
*. **Exhibit GJT8**: Unlawful schedule
please help with a summary of this list: *. **List of Exhibits**
- **Exhibit GJT1: Notice of interim charging order dated * October *.
- **Exhibit GJT2**: Definition of "Dwelling-House" under Halsbury's Laws and the Local Government Finance Act *.
- **Exhibit GJT3**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **.
- **Exhibit GJT4**: Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
- **Exhibit GJT5**: Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
- **Exhibit GJT6**: Schedule extract of liability from * July *.
- **Exhibit GJT7**: Schedule liability order extract issued on * July *.
- **Exhibit GJT8**: Unlawful schedule liability order issued on * July *.
- **Exhibit GJT9**: *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC **.
- **Exhibit GJT10**: Local Government Finance Act *.
- **Exhibit GJT11**: *R (on the application of Wilson) v. Coventry City Council [*] EWHC * (Admin)*.
- **Exhibit GJT12**: *R (on the application of East Sussex County Council) v. Roberts [*] EWCA Civ **.
- **Exhibit GJT13**: *R (on the application of Williams) v. Horsham District Council [*] EWHC * (Admin)*.
- **Exhibit GJT14**: *Uratemp Ventures Ltd v. Collins [*] UKHL **.
- **Exhibit GJT15**: Evidence of consistent council tax payments despite health challenges.
- **Exhibit GJT16**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **.
- **Exhibit GJT17**: *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC **.
- **Exhibit GJT18**: Article * of the Human Rights Act *.
- **Exhibit GJT19**: Disability Discrimination Act *. - **
- **Exhibit GJT20**: Equality Act * - Direct Discrimination.
- **Exhibit GJT21**: Equality Act * - Indirect Discrimination.
- **Exhibit GJT22**: Equality Act * - Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments.
- **Exhibit GJT23**: Equality Act * - Harassment.
- **Exhibit GJT24**: Statement by Shirley Lewald, Solicitor Advocate.
- **Exhibit GJT25**: *Anlaby v. Praetorius (*)*.
- **Exhibit GJT26**: *Crane v. Director of Public Prosecutions [*]*.
- **Exhibit GJT27**: *Craig v. Kanssen [*]*.
- **Exhibit GJT28**: *MacFoy v. United Africa Co. Ltd. [*]*.
- **Exhibit GJT29**: Compensation for financial losses.
- **Exhibit GJT30**: Compensation for emotional distress and mental health impact.
- **Exhibit GJT31**: Reimbursement of legal costs.
- **Exhibit GJT32**: Full reimbursement of council tax payments.
- **Exhibit GJT33**: *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC ** and Local Government Finance Act *.
- **Exhibit GJT34**: Equality Act * and Disability Discrimination Act *.
- **Exhibit GJT35**: *Northern Trains Ltd v. Mark Ballington & Jade Wylie [*] EWHC*.
This completes the list of exhibits for the witness statement.
Certainly! Here is a concise summary of the list of exhibits:
---
**Summary of Exhibits**
*. **Exhibit GJT1**: Notice of interim charging order dated * October *.
*. **Exhibit GJT2**: Definition of "Dwelling-House" under Halsbury's Laws and the Local Government Finance Act *.
*. **Exhibit GJT3**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **.
*. **Exhibit GJT4**: Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
*. **Exhibit GJT5**: Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
*. **Exhibit GJT6**: Schedule extract of liability from * July *.
*. **Exhibit GJT7**: Schedule liability order extract issued on * July *.
*. **Exhibit GJT8**: Unlawful schedule liability order issued on * July *.
*. **Exhibit GJT9**: *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC **.
---
**Summary of Exhibits**
*. **Exhibit GJT1**: Notice of interim charging order dated * October *.
*. **Exhibit GJT2**: Definition of "Dwelling-House" under Halsbury's Laws and the Local Government Finance Act *.
*. **Exhibit GJT3**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **.
*. **Exhibit GJT4**: Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
*. **Exhibit GJT5**: Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
*. **Exhibit GJT6**: Schedule extract of liability from * July *.
*. **Exhibit GJT7**: Schedule liability order extract issued on * July *.
*. **Exhibit GJT8**: Unlawful schedule liability order issued on * July *.
*. **Exhibit GJT9**: *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC **.
please help with brief explanations for each exhibit: from GJT1
Certainly! Here are brief explanations for each exhibit:
*. **Exhibit GJT1**: Notice of interim charging order dated * October *.
- This is the formal notice received regarding an interim charging order placed on the property.
*. **Exhibit GJT2**: Definition of "Dwelling-House" under Halsbury's Laws and the Local Government Finance Act *.
- Provides the legal definition and distinction of a "Dwelling-House" affecting council tax implications.
*. **Exhibit GJT3**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **.
- Case emphasizing the need for judicial oversight in complex cases rather than using summary procedures.
*. **Exhibit GJT4**: Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
- Details of the liability order issued by the court on the specified date.
*. **Exhibit GJT5**: Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
- Additional information provided on the reverse side of the liability order.
*. **Exhibit GJT6**: Schedule extract of liability from * July *
*. **Exhibit GJT1**: Notice of interim charging order dated * October *.
- This is the formal notice received regarding an interim charging order placed on the property.
*. **Exhibit GJT2**: Definition of "Dwelling-House" under Halsbury's Laws and the Local Government Finance Act *.
- Provides the legal definition and distinction of a "Dwelling-House" affecting council tax implications.
*. **Exhibit GJT3**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **.
- Case emphasizing the need for judicial oversight in complex cases rather than using summary procedures.
*. **Exhibit GJT4**: Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
- Details of the liability order issued by the court on the specified date.
*. **Exhibit GJT5**: Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
- Additional information provided on the reverse side of the liability order.
*. **Exhibit GJT6**: Schedule extract of liability from * July *
continue from *
Certainly! Here are the remaining brief explanations for each exhibit:
*. **Exhibit GJT6**: Schedule extract of liability from * July *.
- Details of the liability listed for council tax as of the specified date.
*. **Exhibit GJT7**: Schedule liability order extract issued on * July *.
- Extract of the order detailing the council tax liability issued on the specified date.
*. **Exhibit GJT8**: Unlawful schedule liability order issued on * July *.
- Documentation showing the issuance of a liability order that is claimed to be unlawful.
*. **Exhibit GJT9**: *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC **.
- Case highlighting that demands alone do not constitute definitive proof of debt.
*. **Exhibit GJT10**: Local Government Finance Act *.
- Statutory provisions governing council tax.
*. **Exhibit GJT11**: *R (on the application of Wilson) v. Coventry City Council [*] EWHC * (Admin)*.
- Case supporting the definition of "dwelling" for council tax purposes.
*. **Exhibit GJT6**: Schedule extract of liability from * July *.
- Details of the liability listed for council tax as of the specified date.
*. **Exhibit GJT7**: Schedule liability order extract issued on * July *.
- Extract of the order detailing the council tax liability issued on the specified date.
*. **Exhibit GJT8**: Unlawful schedule liability order issued on * July *.
- Documentation showing the issuance of a liability order that is claimed to be unlawful.
*. **Exhibit GJT9**: *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC **.
- Case highlighting that demands alone do not constitute definitive proof of debt.
*. **Exhibit GJT10**: Local Government Finance Act *.
- Statutory provisions governing council tax.
*. **Exhibit GJT11**: *R (on the application of Wilson) v. Coventry City Council [*] EWHC * (Admin)*.
- Case supporting the definition of "dwelling" for council tax purposes.
continue from *.
Certainly! Here are the remaining brief explanations for each exhibit:
*. **Exhibit GJT12**: *R (on the application of East Sussex County Council) v. Roberts [*] EWCA Civ **.
- Case emphasizing the importance of proper procedural adherence in council tax matters.
*. **Exhibit GJT13**: *R (on the application of Williams) v. Horsham District Council [*] EWHC * (Admin)*.
- Case discussing the requirements for fair and transparent council tax assessments.
*. **Exhibit GJT14**: *Uratemp Ventures Ltd v. Collins [*] UKHL **.
- Case defining "Dwelling-House" and its implications for residential use.
*. **Exhibit GJT15**: Evidence of consistent council tax payments despite health challenges.
- Documentation showing regular payments made towards council tax, demonstrating efforts to comply despite health issues.
*. **Exhibit GJT16**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **.
- Case reinforcing the need for proper judicial oversight in complex council tax matters.
*. **Exhibit G
*. **Exhibit GJT12**: *R (on the application of East Sussex County Council) v. Roberts [*] EWCA Civ **.
- Case emphasizing the importance of proper procedural adherence in council tax matters.
*. **Exhibit GJT13**: *R (on the application of Williams) v. Horsham District Council [*] EWHC * (Admin)*.
- Case discussing the requirements for fair and transparent council tax assessments.
*. **Exhibit GJT14**: *Uratemp Ventures Ltd v. Collins [*] UKHL **.
- Case defining "Dwelling-House" and its implications for residential use.
*. **Exhibit GJT15**: Evidence of consistent council tax payments despite health challenges.
- Documentation showing regular payments made towards council tax, demonstrating efforts to comply despite health issues.
*. **Exhibit GJT16**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **.
- Case reinforcing the need for proper judicial oversight in complex council tax matters.
*. **Exhibit G
continue from *.
Certainly! Here are the remaining brief explanations for each exhibit:
*. **Exhibit GJT17**: *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC **.
- Case emphasizing that demands alone do not constitute definitive proof of debt.
*. **Exhibit GJT18**: Article * of the Human Rights Act *.
- Provision ensuring the right to respect for private and family life, home, and correspondence.
*. **Exhibit GJT19**: Disability Discrimination Act *.
- Statute prohibiting discrimination based on disability and mandating reasonable adjustments.
*. **Exhibit GJT20**: Equality Act * - Direct Discrimination.
- Legal provision addressing direct discrimination against individuals with protected characteristics.
*. **Exhibit GJT21**: Equality Act * - Indirect Discrimination.
- Legal provision addressing policies that disproportionately affect individuals with protected characteristics.
*. **Exhibit GJT22**: Equality Act * - Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments.
- Statutory requirement for making adjustments to accommodate individuals with disabilities.
*. **Exhibit GJT23**: Equality Act * - Harassment.
*. **Exhibit GJT17**: *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC **.
- Case emphasizing that demands alone do not constitute definitive proof of debt.
*. **Exhibit GJT18**: Article * of the Human Rights Act *.
- Provision ensuring the right to respect for private and family life, home, and correspondence.
*. **Exhibit GJT19**: Disability Discrimination Act *.
- Statute prohibiting discrimination based on disability and mandating reasonable adjustments.
*. **Exhibit GJT20**: Equality Act * - Direct Discrimination.
- Legal provision addressing direct discrimination against individuals with protected characteristics.
*. **Exhibit GJT21**: Equality Act * - Indirect Discrimination.
- Legal provision addressing policies that disproportionately affect individuals with protected characteristics.
*. **Exhibit GJT22**: Equality Act * - Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments.
- Statutory requirement for making adjustments to accommodate individuals with disabilities.
*. **Exhibit GJT23**: Equality Act * - Harassment.
continue from *.
Certainly! Here are the remaining brief explanations for each exhibit:
*. **Exhibit GJT24**: Statement by Shirley Lewald, Solicitor Advocate.
- Legal opinion on the void nature of court orders made without jurisdiction or due process.
*. **Exhibit GJT25**: *Anlaby v. Praetorius (*)*.
- Case establishing the principle that void proceedings cannot result in a valid judgment.
*. **Exhibit GJT26**: *Crane v. Director of Public Prosecutions [*]*.
- Case stating that an order void ab initio is not a real order of the court.
*. **Exhibit GJT27**: *Craig v. Kanssen [*]*.
- Case explaining that an order described as a nullity can be set aside by the affected person.
*. **Exhibit GJT28**: *MacFoy v. United Africa Co. Ltd. [*]*.
- Case highlighting that a void order is incurably void, affecting all subsequent proceedings based on it.
*. **Exhibit GJT29**: Compensation for financial losses.
- Documentation detailing financial losses incurred due to the council's actions.
*
*. **Exhibit GJT24**: Statement by Shirley Lewald, Solicitor Advocate.
- Legal opinion on the void nature of court orders made without jurisdiction or due process.
*. **Exhibit GJT25**: *Anlaby v. Praetorius (*)*.
- Case establishing the principle that void proceedings cannot result in a valid judgment.
*. **Exhibit GJT26**: *Crane v. Director of Public Prosecutions [*]*.
- Case stating that an order void ab initio is not a real order of the court.
*. **Exhibit GJT27**: *Craig v. Kanssen [*]*.
- Case explaining that an order described as a nullity can be set aside by the affected person.
*. **Exhibit GJT28**: *MacFoy v. United Africa Co. Ltd. [*]*.
- Case highlighting that a void order is incurably void, affecting all subsequent proceedings based on it.
*. **Exhibit GJT29**: Compensation for financial losses.
- Documentation detailing financial losses incurred due to the council's actions.
*
continue from *.
Certainly! Here are the remaining brief explanations for each exhibit:
*. **Exhibit GJT30**: Compensation for emotional distress and mental health impact.
- Evidence of emotional distress and mental health impact caused by the council's actions.
*. **Exhibit GJT31**: Reimbursement of legal costs.
- Records of legal costs incurred due to the council's actions, seeking reimbursement.
*. **Exhibit GJT32**: Full reimbursement of council tax payments.
- Documentation supporting the claim for reimbursement of council tax payments made.
*. **Exhibit GJT33**: *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC ** and Local Government Finance Act *.
- Case and statute highlighting procedural requirements and principles relevant to council tax matters.
*. **Exhibit GJT34**: Equality Act * and Disability Discrimination Act *.
- Statutes mandating consideration of individual circumstances and reasonable adjustments to prevent discrimination.
*. **Exhibit GJT35**: *Northern Trains Ltd v. Mark Ballington & Jade Wylie [*] EWHC*.
- Case illustrating the improper application of the Single Justice Procedure in complex matters requiring judicial scrutiny.
*. **Exhibit GJT30**: Compensation for emotional distress and mental health impact.
- Evidence of emotional distress and mental health impact caused by the council's actions.
*. **Exhibit GJT31**: Reimbursement of legal costs.
- Records of legal costs incurred due to the council's actions, seeking reimbursement.
*. **Exhibit GJT32**: Full reimbursement of council tax payments.
- Documentation supporting the claim for reimbursement of council tax payments made.
*. **Exhibit GJT33**: *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC ** and Local Government Finance Act *.
- Case and statute highlighting procedural requirements and principles relevant to council tax matters.
*. **Exhibit GJT34**: Equality Act * and Disability Discrimination Act *.
- Statutes mandating consideration of individual circumstances and reasonable adjustments to prevent discrimination.
*. **Exhibit GJT35**: *Northern Trains Ltd v. Mark Ballington & Jade Wylie [*] EWHC*.
- Case illustrating the improper application of the Single Justice Procedure in complex matters requiring judicial scrutiny.
continue from *.
Certainly! Here is the complete list of exhibits with brief explanations:
---
**Summary of Exhibits**
*. **Exhibit GJT1**: Notice of interim charging order dated * October *.
- Formal notice regarding an interim charging order placed on my property.
*. **Exhibit GJT2**: Definition of "Dwelling-House" under Halsbury's Laws and the Local Government Finance Act *.
- Legal definition and distinction affecting council tax implications.
*. **Exhibit GJT3**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **.
- Case emphasizing the need for judicial oversight in complex cases rather than using summary procedures.
*. **Exhibit GJT4**: Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
- Details of the liability order issued by the court on the specified date.
*. **Exhibit GJT5**: Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
- Additional information provided on the reverse side of the liability order.
*. **Exhibit GJT6**: Schedule extract of liability from * July *.
-
---
**Summary of Exhibits**
*. **Exhibit GJT1**: Notice of interim charging order dated * October *.
- Formal notice regarding an interim charging order placed on my property.
*. **Exhibit GJT2**: Definition of "Dwelling-House" under Halsbury's Laws and the Local Government Finance Act *.
- Legal definition and distinction affecting council tax implications.
*. **Exhibit GJT3**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **.
- Case emphasizing the need for judicial oversight in complex cases rather than using summary procedures.
*. **Exhibit GJT4**: Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
- Details of the liability order issued by the court on the specified date.
*. **Exhibit GJT5**: Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
- Additional information provided on the reverse side of the liability order.
*. **Exhibit GJT6**: Schedule extract of liability from * July *.
-
continue from *.
Certainly! Here are the remaining brief explanations for each exhibit:
---
**Summary of Exhibits**
*. **Exhibit GJT1**: Notice of interim charging order dated * October *.
- Formal notice regarding an interim charging order placed on my property.
*. **Exhibit GJT2**: Definition of "Dwelling-House" under Halsbury's Laws and the Local Government Finance Act *.
- Legal definition and distinction affecting council tax implications.
*. **Exhibit GJT3**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **.
- Case emphasizing the need for judicial oversight in complex cases rather than using summary procedures.
*. **Exhibit GJT4**: Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
- Details of the liability order issued by the court on the specified date.
*. **Exhibit GJT5**: Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
- Additional information provided on the reverse side of the liability order.
*. **Exhibit GJT6**: Schedule extract of liability from * July *.
- Details
---
**Summary of Exhibits**
*. **Exhibit GJT1**: Notice of interim charging order dated * October *.
- Formal notice regarding an interim charging order placed on my property.
*. **Exhibit GJT2**: Definition of "Dwelling-House" under Halsbury's Laws and the Local Government Finance Act *.
- Legal definition and distinction affecting council tax implications.
*. **Exhibit GJT3**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **.
- Case emphasizing the need for judicial oversight in complex cases rather than using summary procedures.
*. **Exhibit GJT4**: Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
- Details of the liability order issued by the court on the specified date.
*. **Exhibit GJT5**: Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule liability Order dated * July *.
- Additional information provided on the reverse side of the liability order.
*. **Exhibit GJT6**: Schedule extract of liability from * July *.
- Details
Start a new chat