Fraudulent Court Actions Explained

Summary

Fraud upon the court can be addressed through Rule 60(b)(3) for fraud by an opposing party or independent actions for broader relief. Rule 60(b)(6) offers relief for extraordinary circumstances not covered by other rules. Independent actions are typically filed in district courts, even if fraud occurred at the appellate level, due to their jurisdiction over original cases. Consulting with legal experts, especially for Pro Bono assistance, can provide guidance on navigating these complex legal processes.

Full Conversation

here's my 1st question. In this sentence. "The Defendants improperly invoked Rule *(b)(*) for alleging fraud upon the court, a matter appropriately addressed under other provisions or independent actions." For Fraud UPON the Court, would you explain the specifics as to what are the "...other provisions or independent actions.."
Fraud upon the court can be addressed under:
- Rule *(b)(*): Specifically for fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party.
- Independent actions: Separate lawsuits to challenge judgments obtained through fraud.
These provisions allow for redress without improperly invoking Rule *(b)(*).
So, What do I need to file doe Fraud upon the court under for Rule *(b)(*) ?
To file for fraud upon the court under Rule *(b)(*) in Arizona, you generally need:
- Evidence showing fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party.
- A motion detailing the fraud and how it affected the judgment.
- Filing within a reasonable time, typically not exceeding one year after the judgment.
Would you like more information on how to proceed with filing a motion?
sorry !!! it is the 9th Circuit. So, What do I need to file doe Fraud upon the court under for Rule *(b)(*) ?
Case Rating: *
To file for fraud upon the court under Rule *(b)(*) in the 9th Circuit, you typically need:
- Evidence of fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by the opposing party.
- A detailed motion explaining the fraud and its impact on the judgment.
- Filing within a reasonable time, usually within one year of the judgment.
Do you need more guidance on preparing your motion?
Wait....Fraud upon the court has no time limitation, correct ?
Case Rating: *
Yes, fraud upon the court generally has no time limitation because it attacks the integrity of the court itself. However, it's important to provide solid evidence and detail how the fraud fundamentally undermined the judicial process. Would you like more guidance on how to proceed with this?
ye splease
Case Rating: *
To proceed with addressing fraud upon the court in the 9th Circuit without time limitations, consider:
- Gathering substantial evidence of fraud.
- Preparing a clear and detailed motion explaining the fraud's impact on the judicial process.
Would you need more specific guidance on preparing this motion?
yes I would. But, to start what is the name of the Motion I need to file ? Then would you explain more specific guidance ? Thx
Case Rating: *
To address fraud upon the court in the 9th Circuit, you may file a "Motion for Relief from Judgment" under Rule *(b)(*) or consider an independent action for fraud. Would you like more specific guidance on preparing this motion?
let's start with independent action. The Fraud I have documented evidence of massive fro the * judge panel ad the Appellee. Thx
Case Rating: *
This seems to be a high-value case due to the documented evidence of fraud involving a *-judge panel and the Appellee. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
not right now. But would you explain what "...an independent action for fraud. " is ?
Case Rating: *
An independent action for fraud is a separate lawsuit filed to challenge and potentially overturn a judgment obtained through fraudulent means. This approach can be used when fraud impacts the integrity of the judicial process, often providing broader relief than typical motions.
YUP independent action .... that's the most appropriate action I believe. But can you compare and contrast "......" ' Motion for Relief from Judgment ' " under Rule *(b)(*) versus an independent action for fraud." ?
Case Rating: *
Here's a comparison:
- Motion for Relief from Judgment under Rule *(b)(*):
- Specifically addresses fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party.
- Must be filed within a reasonable time, typically within one year of the judgment.
- Provides a chance to reopen the case based on fraud affecting the judgment.
- Independent Action for Fraud:
- Separate lawsuit to challenge judgments obtained through fraud.
- No time limitation, focusing on fraud impacting the judicial process itself.
- Potentially broader relief, as it can address deeper issues of judicial integrity.
Would you like more details on either option?
OK The Motion for Relief from Judgment under Rule *(b)(*): addresses the opposing party. But, in my case, BOTH the * judge panel AND the Appellee lied, and I can prove it with documented evidence. I BELIEVE my situation is best addressed as ndependent Action for Fraud:
Case Rating: *
Given the serious nature of the fraud involving a *-judge panel and the Appellee, an independent action for fraud seems appropriate. If you change your mind and wish to consider connecting with local lawyers for further assistance, feel free to let me know.
not quite yet... I do tons of research, draft questions and documents Then, it makes sense to speak an attorney. Thanks, anyway OH with what level of Court do I file a separate lawsuit since the Fraud ocurred at the Appellate level ?
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're considering filing an independent action due to fraud occurring at the appellate level. Typically, such a lawsuit would be filed in a federal district court. If you need more guidance on filing procedures or specifics, feel free to ask!
I sure need help starting a new lawsuit at the federal district court....Would I get then wa whole new judge ? otherwise, this could be problematic for two reasons: (*) I drafted a Judicial Complaint against that district court judge and (*) the Defense Counsel lied in District Court as he lied as the Appellee in Appeals Court
Case Rating: *
You'll likely get a new judge for your independent action in federal district court. However, it depends on the court's procedures and your specific case details. Consider consulting with an attorney to navigate potential conflicts with past judicial actions. Do you need guidance on how to proceed?
yes, I do
Case Rating: *
This seems like a high-value case given the fraud involving a *-judge panel and the Appellee. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If you agree, we can proceed with collecting some information to facilitate this.
1st let me ask: Do I have any other legal action options at the Appeals Court level ? I' not sure I understand why I would have to go back to district court .
Case Rating: *
Given your situation, it's understandable why you might want to explore options at the Appeals Court level. However, fraud upon the court often requires an independent action at the district court level to address the integrity issues. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, we can proceed with collecting some information.
Why does fraud upon the Court require independent action at the district level ? I don't understand this. Thx
Case Rating: *
Fraud upon the court typically requires independent action at the district level because it challenges the integrity of the judicial process, often necessitating a separate lawsuit to address the fraud. District courts are generally responsible for such independent actions, providing an opportunity to overturn the judgment based on fraudulent conduct. Would you like more guidance on this process?
Let's see. (*) I Still don't understand why I'd start a new lawsuit in district court, if the Fraud I found was in the Appeals Court ??
Case Rating: *
When fraud is identified at the appellate level, addressing it through an independent action in district court is generally because the district court has jurisdiction to evaluate and overturn judgments based on fraudulent conduct affecting the judicial process. Would you like more guidance on this?
Sorry, I don't understand.....the Fraud occurred in Appeals Court the fradulent judgments was at the Appeal Court level. Why would the district court get involved in a fraudulent judgment at the Appeals Court level ?
Case Rating: *
I understand your confusion. Typically, independent actions for fraud are initiated in district courts because they have jurisdiction over original cases, allowing them to evaluate the integrity of the judicial process. However, addressing fraud at the appellate level may require specific appeals court procedures or consulting with legal experts for guidance. Would you like more information on appeals court processes?
yes that would be great ...more information on appeals court processes?
Case Rating: *
In the appeals court process, here are some key points:
- Appeals: Review decisions of lower courts, focusing on legal errors.
- Procedures: Generally involve written briefs and sometimes oral arguments.
- Relief Options: Limited to affirming, reversing, or remanding the lower court decision.
- Fraud Claims: Typically require independent action in district court for comprehensive review.
Would you like more specific details or guidance on any part of this process?
a few questions. (*) The Appeals Court has a Relief Option to reverse lower court judgment. (*) The Appeals Court was the level which incurred my claims of Fraud UPON the Court. So what is going back to district court going to prove if the Fraud Upon the Court didn't occur there ?
Case Rating: *
Returning to district court for an independent action addresses the fraud's impact on the judicial process itself, regardless of where it occurred. The district court has jurisdiction to assess and potentially overturn judgments based on fraud. Do you have specific concerns about the district court's involvement?
Hold on here.....let's see. i understand the original jurisdiction point. So even though the district court has the original jurisdiction, I appealed my case where the Fraud occurred. i don't see any rationale that would explain how the district court would go on to assess and potentially overturn fraudulent judgments at the Appeals Court level ? Any clarification you have will help.
Case Rating: *
It can be confusing when fraud occurs at the appellate level. Typically, district courts handle independent actions for fraud to ensure a comprehensive review of the judicial process integrity. They assess the fraud's impact and decide if the original judgment should be overturned. Would you like further explanation on how district courts manage such cases?
NOW I GET IT !!!!! YES, the district court dismissal should have been overturned and for that reason I appealed my case. But that means the Fraudulent judgment fromt he Appeals Court goes unaccounted for. the * judge panel the Appellee get off with lying and breaching the judicial machinery ! That's sure not any Justice for the * judge panel nor Appellee ! What are your thoughts on this ?
Case Rating: *
It sounds frustrating when you believe justice wasn't served at the appellate level. For fraud claims against the appellate court, it might be beneficial to consult with legal experts or attorneys specializing in appellate law, as they can provide guidance on possible avenues for addressing such concerns.
You know...for the very 1st time, i'd betterseek consuoltation. Can I get a free consultation cos I am one of those "formas pauperis" Pro Se litigants : )
Case Rating: *
Given the complexities and serious nature of your case, a consultation with a lawyer might be highly beneficial. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
To start, i need a free consultation. I'm retired Social security if my sole source of income. As another option, but would it even be worth it at this starting point to seek Pro Bono help ?
Case Rating: *
Considering your situation, seeking Pro Bono help could be very worthwhile, especially given the complexity and seriousness of your case involving fraud at the appellate level. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
ok
Case Rating: *
This seems to be a high-value case due to the documented evidence of fraud involving a *-judge panel and the Appellee. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If you agree, we can proceed with collecting some information to facilitate this.
it would have to be a Pro Bono lawyer only. I do not have the money to pay a lawyer, and, really, I just need to know, at this point, What action I'd able to take at the Appeals Court level. What do you tink ?
Case Rating: *
Considering the complexities and the fraud allegations involving the appellate court, it might be beneficial to connect with local lawyers for Pro Bono assistance. Would you like to proceed with this? If so, we can collect some information to facilitate the connection.
ok let's try this...
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you might have a strong case involving serious fraud allegations. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If you agree, we can proceed with collecting some necessary information to facilitate this.
Gotta be Pro Bono lawyer. If not Pro Bono, I have to rethink my approach.
Case Rating: *
Given the seriousness of your case and your need for Pro Bono assistance, let's begin the process of connecting you with local lawyers. Could you please provide your phone number?
you know.....I'm going think this over. As always, I'll do a bit more research, not a lot, and formulate meaningful questions for a Pro Bono lawyer. I would plan to check in Friday afternoon. I think this would work.
Case Rating: *
It seems like you're dealing with a complex and potentially high-value case. If you decide to proceed with connecting to local Pro Bono lawyers, feel free to reach out anytime. Meanwhile, if you need further information or guidance, I'm here to help.
Thank you ! It's late so let me pick this up tomorrow mid-morning. As always, I benefit greatly from your help ! Thanks,
Case Rating: *
Given the serious nature of your case involving fraud at the appellate level, it seems like a high-value case. If you decide to connect with Pro Bono lawyers for further assistance, feel free to reach out anytime. I'm here to help with any further information or guidance you might need. Have a great evening!
Thanks !
Case Rating: *
Given the complexities and potential high-value nature of your case involving fraud at the appellate level, seeking Pro Bono assistance could be beneficial. If you decide to proceed with connecting to local lawyers or need further guidance, feel free to reach out anytime. Take care!
I'll be back tomorrow to discuss locating with a Pro Bono attoney ! Bye for now !
Case Rating: *
Your case seems to have significant legal implications, especially with documented fraud involving a *-judge panel and the Appellee. If you wish to connect with Pro Bono lawyers for further assistance, please let me know when you're ready, and we can gather the necessary information to proceed. Enjoy your evening, and I'll be here to assist whenever you're ready!
Sounds good !
Case Rating: *
Your situation involving fraud at the appellate level seems complex and potentially high-value. If you're ready to connect with Pro Bono lawyers, I'm here to assist with gathering the necessary information. When you're ready, feel free to reach out, and we can proceed with the next steps.
**** i'm BACK
Case Rating: *
It seems you have a potentially strong case due to the fraud involving a *-judge panel and the Appellee. Would you like to be connected to local Pro Bono lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, we can proceed with collecting some necessary information to facilitate this.
here we go ! (*) How about Rule *(b)(*) Relief for any.other ..purpose and (*) Isn't there a Motion for Fraud Upon the Court ?
Case Rating: *
Your case seems to involve significant fraud allegations, which might be strong grounds for legal action. Would you like to be connected to local Pro Bono lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If you agree, we can proceed with collecting some information to facilitate this.
Additionally, Rule *(b)(*) provides relief for any other reason that justifies relief from a judgment, often used when circumstances are extraordinary and not covered by other subsections.
For "Fraud Upon the Court," you might consider:
- Independent Action for Fraud: A separate lawsuit challenging judgments obtained through fraudulent means, focusing on the integrity of the judicial process.
Would you like to proceed with connecting to lawyers or need more details on either option?
Hmmmmmm Doesn't what you noted above: "Rule *(b)(*) provides relief for any other reason that justifies relief from a judgment, often used when circumstances are extraordinary and not covered by other subsections." absolutely fit my case for Fraud Upon the Court at the Appeals level. (I do, now, understand about the original jurisdiction point.)
Case Rating: *
Your situation involving fraud upon the court at the appellate level seems quite serious and may warrant legal action under Rule *(b)(*) due to extraordinary circumstances. Would you like to be connected to local Pro Bono lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
Tomorrow I'll be back to discuss next steps.....I'm pretty leaning toward Rule *(b)(*) by FINALLY I do need Pro Bono assistance...or a Free Consultation. See you tomorrow !
Case Rating: *
Your situation seems highly complex and potentially significant due to the fraud allegations at the appellate level. When you're ready to proceed, connecting with local Pro Bono lawyers could be beneficial. Feel free to reach out anytime for assistance in gathering necessary information to connect with legal help. Enjoy your evening, and I look forward to assisting you further tomorrow!
See you then ! Bye for now : )
Case Rating: *
Your case involving fraud at the appellate level appears to be quite significant and complex, possibly requiring legal intervention under Rule *(b)(*) or an independent action. When you're ready, connecting with local Pro Bono lawyers for a free consultation could be beneficial. I'll be here to assist you with gathering the necessary information when you return. Have a great evening!
**** Wait a minute I'm BACK
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you have a potentially strong case involving fraud at the appellate level. Would you like to be connected to local Pro Bono lawyers who can better assist you with your case?