Serving Legal Documents Properly

A claimant issues a claim form on 5th January and serves it on the defendant on 15th January. On 20th January, the claimant's solicitor sends the particulars of claim to the defendant by email. The defendant had confirmed in writing that they would accept service by email. Considering these facts, have the particulars of claim been properly served? Select one alternative: •. Yes, because the defendant had agreed to accept service by email, and the email was sent within 14 days of serving the claim form. • No, because the particulars of claim were not served by first-class post or personal service. • No, because the particulars of claim must be served at the same time as the claim form. • Yes, because the particulars of claim were sent before the four-month validity period of the claim form had expired. • No, because the claimant should have sought permission from the court to serve by email.

A potential claimant in a breach of contract dispute, does not want to waste any time or money. The potential claimant is keen to commence court proceedings immediately. an issue? What is the best advice to give the potential claimant about the next best steps, assuming limitation is not Select one alternative: The potential claimant should issue the case immediately, and then comply with the pre-action protocol as far as possible before service of the particulars of claim. • Parties must manage cases efficiently and expeditiously. It is therefore appropriate for the potential claimant to issue proceedings immediately, and there will be no cost consequences. If the potential claimant does not comply with the relevant pre-action protocol, they may be penalised in costs. • The potential claimant must offer to resolve the case through an alternative dispute resolution method like mediation before issuing court proceedings. • If the potential claimant does not comply with the relevant pre-action protocol, the court will order the claimant to pay the defendant's costs of the proceedings.

uk

A company is being sued by a pedestrian who was born on * June *. One of the company's drivers drove into the pedestrian whilst making a delivery, causing immediate (and clear) spinal injuries. This accident happened in *. The pedestrian's solicitors have been in correspondence with the company from the day after the accident onwards, but proceedings have not yet been issued. What is the best advice to give as to limitation in relation a claim by the pedestrian against the company? Select one alternative: • The claim is time barred because the date of knowledge of the pedestrian was more than 3 years ago (and no extension is possible). • The claim is time barred because the accident was more than three years ago, but the court might grant a discretionary extension of time. • The claim is time barred because the accident was more than three years ago (and no extension is possible). • The claim is not time barred because the date of knowledge of the pedestrian was not more than 3 years ago. • The claim is not time barred because time has not yet begun to run.

A marketing partnership, comprised of partner A and partner B and trading under the name "Company C" was engaged by the client to run a promotional event. Due to mismanagement by the partners, the event was unsuccessful, leading to significant financial loss for the client. The client intends to sue the partnership for breach of contract. How should the client name the defendant on the claim form? Select one alternative: Company C (a firm) Partner A and Partner B t/a Company C Partner A and Partner B • Company C LLP • Company C LLP

uk

A claimant is pursuing a claim against a defendant in relation to an overdue invoice. The claimant issued a claim form on * December * but has not yet served it. The claim form is going to be served by posting it to the customer's principal office. By midnight on which day must the claim form be posted? Select one alternative: • * December * * December * * January * * June * * * April *

A claim form is deemed served on the defendant on Monday * November. The defendant is also sent an email on Monday * November informing them that the particulars of claim had been sent by first class post that day. Which is the last day on which your client can acknowledge service or file a defence? Select one alternative: Monday * November Monday * November • Thursday * November • Wednesday * November Wednesday * November

A claimant is pursuing a claim against a defendant in relation to an overdue invoice. The claimant issued a claim form on * December * but has not yet served it. The claim form is going to be served by posting it to the customer's principal office. By midnight on which day must the claim form be posted? Select one alternative: • * December * * December * * January * • * June * * April *

A claim form is deemed served on the defendant on Monday * November. The defendant is also sent an email on Monday * November informing them that the particulars of claim had been sent by first class post that day. Which is the last day on which your client can acknowledge service or file a defence? Select one alternative: • Monday * November Monday * November Thursday * November Wednesday * November Wednesday * November

A consultancy was contracted to carry out an environmental assessment of a site that a manufacturer was considering purchasing. Their report concluded that there were no environmental issues, and the manufacturer went ahead with the purchase. Soon after the purchase it was discovered that pipes leading to an oil tank were leaking requiring £* million in remedial work to render the site safe. The manufacturer intends to sue the consultancy. The contract between the parties had an express written clause that the assessment would be carried out "using reasonable care and skil". What duties would you expect to be identified in the particulars of claim? Select one alternative: Express, written contractual duty. Implied contractual duty under the Sale of Goods Act. Tortious duty of Express, written contractual duty. care. Express, written contractual duty. Tortious duty of care. Tortious duty of care. Express, written contractual duty. Implied contractual duty under the Supply of Goods and Services Act. Express, written contractual duty. Implied contractual duty under the Supply of Goods and Services Act.

are you sure?

will we not apply goods and services act?

will there be any contractual duty?

A claimant has issued proceedings against the defendant for non-payment of a loan. Under the loan agreement, the Claimant advanced a loan of £*,* to the Defendant to be repaid in * monthly instalments of £*,*, each instalment to be paid on the 1st of the month. The claimant's particulars of claim state: *. In breach of clause * of the Contract, the Defendant failed to pay the 4th and 5th instalments of £*,* due on * September and * October. The defendant says it did pay the 4th and 5th instalments on the due dates and has bank statements with details of the payments. What would be the best way for the defendant to respond to the allegation the defence? Select one alternative: Admit the allegation Deny the allegation Require proof of the allegation Deny the allegation with reasons Not respond to the allegation

A claimant brings a breach of contract claim against a defendant. The defendant wishes to defend that claim and also wishes to bring a claim against the claimant for an unpaid invoice. What form should the defence and the claim against the claimant take? Select one alternative: The defence should be included in one document and the claim against the data management company in a separate notice of claim. • They should each be included in a separate document and filed at court. • The defence and claim will not be distinguishable in the way they are set out. The defence should be included in one document and the claim against the data management company set out in a separate document appended to an application to court. They should normally be included in a single document, defence first.

The claimant alleges the defendant has breached their contract for the supply of goods. The claimant says that two out of five deliveries of goods were of unsatisfactory quality causing losses to the claimant. The defendant denies this and blames the storage company. If the claimant can resolve the dispute quickly, it would like to continue working with the defendant for a further year, particularly if the defendant can offer a preferential contractual price, because the defendant is local to the claimant for quick and efficient delivery. Whatever happens, the claimant would like to recover its losses. What would be the best mechanism(s) for the claimant to resolve the dispute? Mediation

if mediation is unsuccessful

in the above scenario if mediation is unsuccessful then

A claimant in a personal injury case is struggling to cover ongoing medical expenses and has applied for an interim payment. The claimant's application notice was served on the defendant's solicitor 16 days before the scheduled interim hearing date, along with a medical report detailing the claimant's injuries and evidence of ongoing medical costs. The defendant disputes liability and opposes the claimant's application. What conditions and procedural requirements will the court consider when deciding whether to grant an interim payment in this scenario? Select one alternative: The court must be satisfied that if the claim went to trial the claimant would obtain judgment for a substantial amount of money against the defendant and that the claimant has served the application notice and evidence at least 3 days before the interim hearing. The claimant must show evidence of the defendant's assets to secure the interim payment. The claimant must have obtained judgment against the defendant. The defendant must have admitted liability to the claimant in writing. The court must be satisfied that if the claim went to trial the claimant would obtain judgment for a substantial amount of money against the defendant and that the claimant has served the application notice and evidence at least 14 days before the interim hearing.

The claimant, a software company, has issued proceedings against the defendant, a former employee for breach of a confidentiality agreement. The claimant alleges that the defendant shared proprietary information with a competitor. The defendant admits to the communication but argues that the information shared was not proprietary and was already publicly available. The claimant makes an application for summary judgment against the defendant. How should the court assess whether to grant summary judgment in this scenario? Select one alternative: The court should only grant summary judgment if the defendant can show that they have a real prospect of successfully defending the claim or there is some other good reason that the defendant should be allowed to defend the claim. The court should grant summary judgment as the defendant admits communicating with a competitor. The court will not consider the application as only the defendant can apply for summary judgment. The court should consider whether the shared information would plausibly be considered proprietary by a reasonable person. The court should consider whether the defendant has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim and whether there is no other compelling reason why the claim should proceed to trial.

A company is pursuing a claim against three other companies. The claim is valued at £*,*. The dispute involves complex issues surrounding the delivery of defective goods, contractual obligations, and potential breaches. The trial is anticipated to last for three days, and oral evidence from two experts per party will be necessary. Which track is appropriate for this claim? Select one alternative: The claim should be allocated to the multi track as the value is more than £*,*. The claim should be allocated to the intermediate track because the trial is likely to last for 3 days and there are * experts per party. The claim should be allocated to the intermediate track because the value is less than £*,*. • The claim should be allocated to the multi track because the trial is likely to last for 3 days. • The claim should be allocated to the multi-track due to the number of parties involved in the litigation.

are you sure?

will it not be intermediate track? as the value is less than * pounds

A claimant and defendant are involved in litigation regarding a complex financial dispute, and the case has been allocated to the multi-track. The court has scheduled a costs and case management conference (CCMC) in four weeks' time. What must the parties do in relation to the disclosure report before the CCMC? Select one alternative: Only the claimant needs to file and serve a disclosure report 14 days before the CCMC, and use of the electronic documents questionnaire is optional. Both parties must file and serve a disclosure report at least 7 days before the CCMC, without considering the electronic documents questionnaire. Both parties must file and serve a disclosure report at least 14 days before the CCMC, and consider using the electronic documents questionnaire if applicable. Both parties must file and serve a disclosure report at least 21 days before the CCMC, regardless of whether there are electronic documents involved. • Neither party needs to file a disclosure report if they do not intend to use electronic documents at the trial.

The defendant to a claim has applied to court for an extension of time for service of witness statements. The application is listed for hearing on Friday * November. The court has not given any directions in relation to the filing of evidence. The claimant wishes to oppose the application. When must the claimant serve any evidence on which it wishes to reply? Select one alternative: By Thursday * November. Within 3 days of deemed service of the application notice and any supporting evidence. By Monday * November. * hours before the hearing. As soon as possible.

A defendant in a debt recovery claim has just filed its defence. It agrees that the terms of the contract and goods provided were as set out in the particulars of claim. However, the defendant disagrees with the allegation it has failed to pay the sums due as it has bank documents recording payment for the goods and an email from the claimant confirming receipt of the payment. The defendant assumes that the claimant has made an administrative error, but despite the defendant setting out its position clearly in its defence and providing copies of the documents referred to, the claimant is persisting in the claim. What is the best course of action for the defendant to take, if any? Select one alternative: Serve a request for further information (and apply to court for this if necessary). Request disclosure of documents evidencing the alleged non-payment now (and apply to court for this if necessary. Request disclosure in relation to the alleged non-payment when the proceedings reach the disclosure stage and apply to court at that stage, if necessary). Apply for summary judgment (unless the claimant will concede this). Apply for strike out (unless the claimant will concede this).

A trial is due to start on Wednesday * November and the trial bundles need to be filed with the court. There are no bank holidays in the two weeks preceding Wednesday * November. What is the latest date by which the trial bundles must be lodged with the court? Select one alternative: Monday * November Thursday * November Wednesday * November Friday * November Wednesday * October

isnt it friday * november

A claimant is seeking £*,* plus interest for breach of contract from the defendant. Proceedings have been issued and a costs and case management conference is due to take place in three weeks' time. The parties have already filed and exchanged costs budgets and disclosure reports. It has been agreed that there is no need for the parties to file electronic disclosure questionnaires. What further document should the parties file at court before the case and costs management conference and when? Select one alternative: Budget discussion report no later than 14 days before the case and costs management conference Budget discussion report no later than 7 days before the case and costs management conference Statement of costs * hours before the case and costs management conference Statement of costs no later than 7 days before the case and costs management conference Costs management order no later than 14 days before the case and costs management conference

A pension company wishes to seek an interim injunction against a former employee to restrain the use of a confidential customer database by that employee. The application will be made without notice. Which of the following undertakings is the pension company likely to be required to give to the court as part of the grant of the interim injunction sought? Select one alternative: • To pay to the employee any damages which the court considers should be paid. To deposit a sum of money with the court in relation to the costs of complying with or opposing the injunction. To pay the employee's costs of complying with the interim injunction. • To pay the employee's costs of responding to the application at any subsequent with-notice hearing. To deposit a sum of money with the employee's solicitor.

The claimant issued its claim honestly believing it had a strong case for a breach of service agreement. On receipt of the defence, the claimant realises it does not have a claim and does not wish to pursue its claim against the defendant any further. What are the usual cost consequences of the claimant discontinuing the claim? Select one alternative: The claimant is liable to pay the defendant's costs on the indemnity basis The defendant is liable to pay all the claimant's costs • There will be hearing to decide liability for costs The claimant is liable to pay the defendant's costs up to the point of discontinuance The defendant is liable to pay the claimant's costs up to the service of the defence and the claimant is liable to pay the defendant's costs thereafter

A woman is on holiday in Spain where she is involved in a fair ground accident being run negligently by a touring French fairground operator. The woman suffers a back injury and spends a week in hospital in Spain before returning to England. After her return to England the woman takes two months off work to recover from her injury. The woman wishes to commence proceedings against the fair ground operator in relation to their negligence. Which of the following best explains which country's laws will govern this dispute? Select one alternative: English law, because the majority of the losses were suffered in England. English law, because the claimant lives in England. Spanish law, because the injury was sustained in Spain. Spanish law, because the negligence occurred in Spain. French law, because the negligent fairground operator lives in France.

uk

Two months before trial, a defendant in a breach of contract claim made a valid Part * offer in the sum of £*,* to the claimant. The final day of the offer's relevant period was * July. The claimant did not accept the defendant's offer. No other Part * offers were made. At trial, the court gave judgment in favour of the claimant in the sum £*,* which included £*,* in relation to interest. On the information provided what would be the usual order for the Court to make in relation to costs? Select one alternative: The defendant to pay the claimant's costs on the standard basis up to * July and then the claimant to pay the defendant's costs (and interest on those costs) from * July onwards. The defendant to pay the claimant's costs on the standard basis up to * July and then no order as to costs for the period from * July onwards. The claimant to pay the defendant's costs of the claim on the standard basis. The defendant to pay the claimant's costs on the standard basis up to * July and then the claimant to pay the defendant's costs together with an additional sum, enhanced interest and costs on the indemnity basis from * July onwards. The defendant to pay the claimant's costs of the claim on the standard basis

The claimant in a breach of contract claim is confident of success at trial. The claim is valued at £*,*. Immediately before the first case management conference, the claimant makes a Part * offer to accept £*,*. The offer is not withdrawn nor accepted at any stage. At trial the claimant is awarded £*,* as damages for the breach of contract. What else is the court likely to order (unless it considers it unjust to do so)? Select one alternative: The claimant will be awarded additional interest, costs, and interest on costs from the end of the relevant period onwards, and a lump sum of money. The defendant will be awarded its costs up to the end of the relevant period, and the claimant will be awarded its costs after that point. The claimant will be awarded its costs of the entire proceedings, on the indemnity basis. The defendant will be awarded its costs from the end of the relevant period and interest on those costs. The claimant will be awarded additional interest, costs, and interest on costs for the entirety of the proceedings, and a lump sum of money.

The claimant in a breach of contract claim has completed standard disclosure in accordance with the Order for Directions. In the process of preparing its witness statements, the claimant discovers a document that supports the defendant's case on the agreed contractual terms but which it was unaware of at the time standard disclosure was given, despite carrying out an appropriate search for documents. Which of the following statements best describes what the claimant must do to satisfy its disclosure obligations, if anything? Select one alternative: The claimant need not do anything because it has already completed its disclosure. The claimant must immediately disclose the document. The claimant need not do anything because it does not intend to rely on the document. The claimant must write to court explaining the late disclosure and send a copy of that letter to the defendant. The claimant must apply to court for relief from sanctions.

The defendant in a professional negligence claim is undertaking standard disclosure according to the court's Order for Directions. The defendant's solicitor finds the pre-action letter of claim sent by the claimant amongst its files. Is it likely that this document needs to be disclosed? Select one alternative: No, because it is open correspondence common to both parties. Yes, because it is likely to support the claimant's case and be adverse to the defendant's case. No, because it does not meet the test for standard disclosure. No, because it is privileged. Yes, because it is correspondence relating to the case.

uk