TRY ME!
Final Draft Court Statement
Summary
It is crucial to ensure that your court statement is well-organized and comprehensive. Verify that all exhibits are clearly labeled and attached to support your claims. Consider shortening sections for readability while maintaining key points. Ensure accuracy in dates and names. Legal advice may be beneficial for complex issues.Full Conversation
can you help with the above
Certainly, Gary. Your draft is thorough and well-organised. Here are some specific suggestions for improvement:
*. Ensure all exhibits are clearly labelled and attached.
*. Consider shortening some sections while maintaining key points for readability.
*. Verify dates and names for accuracy.
Is there a particular section or issue you need more help with?
*. Ensure all exhibits are clearly labelled and attached.
*. Consider shortening some sections while maintaining key points for readability.
*. Verify dates and names for accuracy.
Is there a particular section or issue you need more help with?
can you create a list of the exhibits with a decription or extract from the citation to how it supports my case to insert under paragraph *
Certainly, Gary. Here is a list of the exhibits with a description or extract from the citation to how it supports your case to insert under paragraph *:
Exhibit List and Descriptions
*. **Exhibit List**:
- **Exhibit GJT1**: *Uratemp Ventures Ltd v. Collins [*] UKHL **
- **Description**: Establishes legal protections for "Dwelling-Houses," supporting the classification of your property.
- **Exhibit GJT2**: *R (on the application of Wilson) v. Coventry City Council [*] EWHC * (Admin)*
- **Description**: Highlights the legal significance of correctly classifying a property as a "Dwelling-House."
- **Exhibit GJT3**: Notification of Interim Charging Order dated * November *
- **Description**: Demonstrates the council’s retroactive and unlawful charging order.
- **Exhibit GJT4**: Extract from Halsbury’s Laws of England on "Dwelling-House"
- **Description**: Supports the legal distinction and protections for "Dwelling-Houses."
- **Exhibit GJT5**: *R v. Birmingham
*. **Exhibit List**:
- **Exhibit GJT1**: *Uratemp Ventures Ltd v. Collins [*] UKHL **
- **Description**: Establishes legal protections for "Dwelling-Houses," supporting the classification of your property.
- **Exhibit GJT2**: *R (on the application of Wilson) v. Coventry City Council [*] EWHC * (Admin)*
- **Description**: Highlights the legal significance of correctly classifying a property as a "Dwelling-House."
- **Exhibit GJT3**: Notification of Interim Charging Order dated * November *
- **Description**: Demonstrates the council’s retroactive and unlawful charging order.
- **Exhibit GJT4**: Extract from Halsbury’s Laws of England on "Dwelling-House"
- **Description**: Supports the legal distinction and protections for "Dwelling-Houses."
- **Exhibit GJT5**: *R v. Birmingham
continue from: - **Exhibit GJT5**: *R v. Birmingham
Certainly, Gary. Continuing from where you left off:
- **Exhibit GJT5**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **
- **Description**: Reinforces the necessity for individualized judicial scrutiny in processing liability orders.
- **Exhibit GJT6**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **
- **Description**: Highlights the inappropriateness of using the Single Justice Procedure (SJP) for complex council tax disputes.
- **Exhibit GJT7**: *R v. Swindon Borough Council ex parte Roberts [*] EWHC Admin **
- **Description**: Establishes that the absence of lawful liability court orders and unique case numbers constitutes a serious breach.
- **Exhibit GJT8**: Schedule of Liability Orders dated * July *
- **Description**: Provides evidence of the unlawful schedule of liability orders.
- **Exhibit GJT9**: Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule of Liability Orders
- **Description**: Shows an impermissible liability order.
- **Exhibit
- **Exhibit GJT5**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **
- **Description**: Reinforces the necessity for individualized judicial scrutiny in processing liability orders.
- **Exhibit GJT6**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin **
- **Description**: Highlights the inappropriateness of using the Single Justice Procedure (SJP) for complex council tax disputes.
- **Exhibit GJT7**: *R v. Swindon Borough Council ex parte Roberts [*] EWHC Admin **
- **Description**: Establishes that the absence of lawful liability court orders and unique case numbers constitutes a serious breach.
- **Exhibit GJT8**: Schedule of Liability Orders dated * July *
- **Description**: Provides evidence of the unlawful schedule of liability orders.
- **Exhibit GJT9**: Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule of Liability Orders
- **Description**: Shows an impermissible liability order.
- **Exhibit
continue from: **Exhibit GJT9**: Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule of Liability Orders
- **Description**: Shows an impermissible liability order.
- **Exhibit
Certainly, Gary. Continuing from where you left off:
- **Exhibit GJT10**: Schedule of Liability Orders dated * July *
- **Description**: Confirms the illegitimate liability orders issued to *,* defendants.
- **Exhibit GJT11**: *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC **
- **Description**: Asserts that mere demands do not equate to definitive proof of debt.
- **Exhibit GJT12**: Extract from the Human Rights Act *, Article *
- **Description**: Safeguards the right to respect for private and family life, supporting your claim of rights infringement.
- **Exhibit GJT13**: Extract from the Disability Discrimination Act *
- **Description**: Highlights the requirement for reasonable adjustments and prohibition of unfavorable treatment based on disability.
- **Exhibit GJT14**: Extract from the Equality Act * on Indirect Discrimination
- **Description**: Supports claims of indirect discrimination due to the council’s imposition of financial burdens.
- **Exhibit GJT15**: Extract from the Equality Act * on Reasonable Adjustments
- **Exhibit GJT10**: Schedule of Liability Orders dated * July *
- **Description**: Confirms the illegitimate liability orders issued to *,* defendants.
- **Exhibit GJT11**: *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC **
- **Description**: Asserts that mere demands do not equate to definitive proof of debt.
- **Exhibit GJT12**: Extract from the Human Rights Act *, Article *
- **Description**: Safeguards the right to respect for private and family life, supporting your claim of rights infringement.
- **Exhibit GJT13**: Extract from the Disability Discrimination Act *
- **Description**: Highlights the requirement for reasonable adjustments and prohibition of unfavorable treatment based on disability.
- **Exhibit GJT14**: Extract from the Equality Act * on Indirect Discrimination
- **Description**: Supports claims of indirect discrimination due to the council’s imposition of financial burdens.
- **Exhibit GJT15**: Extract from the Equality Act * on Reasonable Adjustments
continue from: - **Exhibit GJT15**: Extract from the Equality Act * on Reasonable Adjustments
- **Description**: Highlights the council's duty to implement reasonable adjustments for disabled individuals.
- **Exhibit GJT16**: Evidence of Harassment by the Council
- **Description**: Demonstrates the council's systematic targeting and harassment over the years.
- **Exhibit GJT17**: Statement by Shirley Lewald on Void Court Orders
- **Description**: Affirms that orders issued without jurisdiction or in violation of due process are void.
- **Exhibit GJT18**: *Anlaby v. Praetorius (*)*
- **Description**: Supports the invalidation of judgments obtained through fundamentally void proceedings.
- **Exhibit GJT19**: *Crane v. Director of Public Prosecutions [*]*
- **Description**: Endorses the principle that an order void ab initio lacks validity.
- **Exhibit GJT20**: *Craig v. Kanssen [*]*
- **Description**: Justifies setting aside orders that are nullities.
- **Exhibit GJT21**: *MacFoy v. United Africa Co. Ltd. [*]*
- **Description**: States that a void order is
- **Exhibit GJT16**: Evidence of Harassment by the Council
- **Description**: Demonstrates the council's systematic targeting and harassment over the years.
- **Exhibit GJT17**: Statement by Shirley Lewald on Void Court Orders
- **Description**: Affirms that orders issued without jurisdiction or in violation of due process are void.
- **Exhibit GJT18**: *Anlaby v. Praetorius (*)*
- **Description**: Supports the invalidation of judgments obtained through fundamentally void proceedings.
- **Exhibit GJT19**: *Crane v. Director of Public Prosecutions [*]*
- **Description**: Endorses the principle that an order void ab initio lacks validity.
- **Exhibit GJT20**: *Craig v. Kanssen [*]*
- **Description**: Justifies setting aside orders that are nullities.
- **Exhibit GJT21**: *MacFoy v. United Africa Co. Ltd. [*]*
- **Description**: States that a void order is
continue from: - **Description**: States that a void order is
- **Description**: States that a void order is irrevocably void, rendering all proceedings based on it void.
- **Exhibit GJT22**: Evidence of Financial Losses
- **Description**: Documents fines and additional costs amounting to approximately £*,*.
- **Exhibit GJT23**: Evidence of Emotional Distress
- **Description**: Provides proof of severe emotional distress, estimated at £*,*.
- **Exhibit GJT24**: Layman's Fees Calculation
- **Description**: Details reimbursement for layman's services, calculated at £* per hour, estimated at £*,*.
- **Exhibit GJT25**: *Gravesham Borough Council v. Secretary of State for the Environment* [*] * P&CR *
- **Description**: Confirms the criteria for a "Dwelling-House," supporting your property's classification.
- **Exhibit GJT26**: *R (on the application of Mackay) v. Newham London Borough Council [*] EWHC * (Admin)*
- **Description**: Emphasizes the importance of open court hearings for issuing liability orders.
- **
- **Exhibit GJT22**: Evidence of Financial Losses
- **Description**: Documents fines and additional costs amounting to approximately £*,*.
- **Exhibit GJT23**: Evidence of Emotional Distress
- **Description**: Provides proof of severe emotional distress, estimated at £*,*.
- **Exhibit GJT24**: Layman's Fees Calculation
- **Description**: Details reimbursement for layman's services, calculated at £* per hour, estimated at £*,*.
- **Exhibit GJT25**: *Gravesham Borough Council v. Secretary of State for the Environment* [*] * P&CR *
- **Description**: Confirms the criteria for a "Dwelling-House," supporting your property's classification.
- **Exhibit GJT26**: *R (on the application of Mackay) v. Newham London Borough Council [*] EWHC * (Admin)*
- **Description**: Emphasizes the importance of open court hearings for issuing liability orders.
- **
continue from: - **Description**: Emphasizes the importance of open court hearings for issuing liability orders.
- **
- **Exhibit GJT27**: *Smith v. Northumberland County Council* [*] EWHC * (Admin)
- **Description**: Confirms the classification of a property with essential living facilities as a "Dwelling-House."
- **Exhibit GJT28**: *Brown v. Southwark Borough Council* [*] EWCA Civ *
- **Description**: Recognizes the property’s classification as a "Dwelling-House" based on essential living facilities.
- **Exhibit GJT29**: *Taylor v. Leeds City Council* [*] EWCA Civ *
- **Description**: Supports the "Dwelling-House" classification due to essential living facilities.
- **Exhibit GJT30**: *Williams v. Horsham District Council* [*] EWCA Civ *
- **Description**: Demonstrates successful reclassification and council tax refund due to misclassification.
- **Exhibit GJT31**: *Jones v. Liverpool City Council* [*] EWHC * (Admin)
- **Description**: Secures a refund for incorrect classification as a "dw
- **Description**: Confirms the classification of a property with essential living facilities as a "Dwelling-House."
- **Exhibit GJT28**: *Brown v. Southwark Borough Council* [*] EWCA Civ *
- **Description**: Recognizes the property’s classification as a "Dwelling-House" based on essential living facilities.
- **Exhibit GJT29**: *Taylor v. Leeds City Council* [*] EWCA Civ *
- **Description**: Supports the "Dwelling-House" classification due to essential living facilities.
- **Exhibit GJT30**: *Williams v. Horsham District Council* [*] EWCA Civ *
- **Description**: Demonstrates successful reclassification and council tax refund due to misclassification.
- **Exhibit GJT31**: *Jones v. Liverpool City Council* [*] EWHC * (Admin)
- **Description**: Secures a refund for incorrect classification as a "dw
continue from: - **Exhibit GJT31**: *Jones v. Liverpool City Council* [*] EWHC * (Admin)
- **Description**: Secures a refund for incorrect classification as a "dw
- **Exhibit GJT32**: *Smith v. Northumberland County Council* [*] EWHC * (Admin)
- **Description**: Demonstrates the successful reclassification of property and refund due to incorrect council tax classification.
- **Exhibit GJT33**: Documented Request for Evidence from the Council
- **Description**: Shows formal requests for substantiating evidence from the council about the alleged debt.
- **Exhibit GJT34**: Evidence of Health Conditions
- **Description**: Provides documentation of health conditions relevant to the claim of discrimination and need for reasonable adjustments.
- **Exhibit GJT35**: Extract from the Local Government Finance Act *
- **Description**: Highlights the lack of clear provisions for the classification of "Dwelling-House."
- **Exhibit GJT36**: Comparative Case Studies
- **Description**: Presents case-law supporting consistent judicial decisions on property classification and legal criteria.
This concludes the list of exhibits with descriptions to support your case under paragraph *.
- **Description**: Demonstrates the successful reclassification of property and refund due to incorrect council tax classification.
- **Exhibit GJT33**: Documented Request for Evidence from the Council
- **Description**: Shows formal requests for substantiating evidence from the council about the alleged debt.
- **Exhibit GJT34**: Evidence of Health Conditions
- **Description**: Provides documentation of health conditions relevant to the claim of discrimination and need for reasonable adjustments.
- **Exhibit GJT35**: Extract from the Local Government Finance Act *
- **Description**: Highlights the lack of clear provisions for the classification of "Dwelling-House."
- **Exhibit GJT36**: Comparative Case Studies
- **Description**: Presents case-law supporting consistent judicial decisions on property classification and legal criteria.
This concludes the list of exhibits with descriptions to support your case under paragraph *.
Start a new chat