Citing Legal Precedents Effectively

Full Conversation

Is this how it would be written in a brief
Yes, a legal brief would contain references to precedents. However, it's usually more comprehensive, including a statement of facts, issues, arguments, and conclusion. Quoting a case like "Miranda v. Arizona" would be a part of the arguments, highlighting its relevance to the current case.
How would international shoe v washington be citrd in a brief
In a brief, "International Shoe v. Washington" would typically be cited as follows:
• Case name: International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington
• Citation: * U.S. * (*)
• Mention the principles derived from the case and how they apply to your argument.
And thanhow would other courts who cited this case be quoted
In a brief, when other courts cite "International Shoe v. Washington", it would look like this:
• Case Name: [Subsequent Case]
• Citation: [Subsequent Case Citation]
• Quote: "Following International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington, * U.S. * (*), we..."
They'll discuss how the principle from International Shoe applies to their case.
If cited by m.shanken v cigar * how would it look
In a brief, if "M. Shanken v. Cigar *" cites "International Shoe v. Washington", it would look like this:
• Case Name: M. Shanken v. Cigar *
• Citation: [M. Shanken v. Cigar * Citation]
• Quote: "In the vein of International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington, * U.S. * (*), we..."
They'll discuss how the principle from International Shoe applies to their case.
Can new york state exercise NY cplr sec * in a diversity action in dis trict court in new york, long arm statue
Yes, NY CPLR sec * may be applied in a diversity action in federal district court in NY, as long as it does not conflict with federal procedural rules. This section pertains to jurisdiction over persons, property, or status.