TRY ME!
Emails As Legal Evidence
Summary
Emails are not affidavits; they require notarization to be used as evidence. If a court ignores properly filed evidence, it may be a procedural issue. Fraud upon the court requires clear evidence of intentional deception. Organizing evidence and presenting a clear argument is crucial. Consider consulting a legal professional for guidance.Full Conversation
Would these items be Affidavits? I have emails from the 9th Circuit staff from the Help Desk that would demonstrate that by seeking clarity from the Help Desk, I wanted to file particular evidence ?
The emails themselves wouldn't typically be considered affidavits. An affidavit is a written statement confirmed by oath or affirmation, used as evidence in court. You might need to create an affidavit that includes the information from the emails, along with any necessary details, and have it notarized.
Is there a specific reason you're considering these emails as affidavits?
Is there a specific reason you're considering these emails as affidavits?
Emails as AFfidavits would confirm I had evidence to file for the Court. If that Affidavits works, and the C ourt never acknowledged the evidence I filed, that would be a breach similar to ignorig evidence or a breach of Judicial Machinery
Hey ****! It sounds like you're dealing with a challenging situation. Here are a few points to consider:
- Emails are not affidavits; they need notarization to qualify.
- If a court ignores evidence properly filed, it may be a procedural issue.
- You might need legal advice to address potential breaches.
Are you considering any specific legal action regarding this issue?
- Emails are not affidavits; they need notarization to qualify.
- If a court ignores evidence properly filed, it may be a procedural issue.
- You might need legal advice to address potential breaches.
Are you considering any specific legal action regarding this issue?
Can you provide further detail on ".....what may be a procedural issue" regarding ignoring evidence ?
Case Rating: *
Ignoring evidence can be a procedural issue if:
- The evidence was submitted correctly and timely, following court rules.
- The court failed to review or acknowledge the evidence.
- If the court's actions violate procedural rules, it might be grounds for an appeal.
Are you considering pursuing any legal remedies related to this matter?
Ignoring evidence can be a procedural issue if:
- The evidence was submitted correctly and timely, following court rules.
- The court failed to review or acknowledge the evidence.
- If the court's actions violate procedural rules, it might be grounds for an appeal.
Are you considering pursuing any legal remedies related to this matter?
Do you mean an Appeal from my Appeal in the 9th Circuit ?
Case Rating: *
Hey ****! If you're thinking about appealing a decision from the 9th Circuit, it would typically involve seeking a rehearing or petitioning to the U.S. Supreme Court if grounds exist. Are you considering escalating the matter beyond the 9th Circuit?
Hey ****! If you're thinking about appealing a decision from the 9th Circuit, it would typically involve seeking a rehearing or petitioning to the U.S. Supreme Court if grounds exist. Are you considering escalating the matter beyond the 9th Circuit?
Not on this issue. I would include this issue, the failure of the Court to read and acknowledge my Requests for Relief as part of my Motion for Fraud UPON the Court
Case Rating: *
Hey ****, it seems like you’re dealing with a complex legal situation. In Arizona, proving fraud upon the court can be challenging. For your motion regarding fraud upon the court, consider these points:
- Fraud must involve a deliberate deception impacting the court's decision.
- Evidence of fraud should be clear and convincing.
- Procedural errors might not qualify as fraud unless intentional deception is proven.
Are you considering gathering more evidence to support your motion for fraud upon the court?
Hey ****, it seems like you’re dealing with a complex legal situation. In Arizona, proving fraud upon the court can be challenging. For your motion regarding fraud upon the court, consider these points:
- Fraud must involve a deliberate deception impacting the court's decision.
- Evidence of fraud should be clear and convincing.
- Procedural errors might not qualify as fraud unless intentional deception is proven.
Are you considering gathering more evidence to support your motion for fraud upon the court?
sorry, again it's the 9th Circuit. Not on this issue. I would include this issue, the failure of the Court to read and acknowledge my Requests for Relief as part of my Motion for Fraud UPON the Court
Case Rating: *
Hey ****, it sounds like you're dealing with a complex legal situation. Gathering more evidence to demonstrate the court's failure to acknowledge your Requests for Relief could strengthen your motion for fraud upon the court. Have you considered compiling documentation or evidence to support your claims further?
Hey ****, it sounds like you're dealing with a complex legal situation. Gathering more evidence to demonstrate the court's failure to acknowledge your Requests for Relief could strengthen your motion for fraud upon the court. Have you considered compiling documentation or evidence to support your claims further?
you bet ! I have massive number of pages proving the misrepresented, really lied, about the contents of my Opening Brief and Reply Brief
Case Rating: *
Hey ****, you've got a lot of documentation that might be useful. It's crucial to compile and organize these pages to clearly show the misrepresentation. Consider consulting a legal professional to ensure your motion for fraud upon the court is well-supported. If you need to escalate the issue, are you considering seeking additional legal advice?
Hey ****, you've got a lot of documentation that might be useful. It's crucial to compile and organize these pages to clearly show the misrepresentation. Consider consulting a legal professional to ensure your motion for fraud upon the court is well-supported. If you need to escalate the issue, are you considering seeking additional legal advice?
Not at this time. I'm deciding if taking more time to investigate the apparent failure of the Court to read my Requests..... OTHER THAN what has been discussed here .....IS A JUSTIFIABLE USE OF MY TIME GIVEN I'M PURSUING A MOTION FOR FRAUD UPON THE COURT. Now the Court ignoring my really substantive evidence from my Opening Brief I'll definitely work a lot on
Case Rating: *
It seems like you have a substantial amount of documentation to support your claims, which is crucial for your motion. You might want to focus on clearly presenting this evidence to show how the court misrepresented your briefs. If you decide to proceed, consulting with a legal professional could be beneficial.
It seems like you have a substantial amount of documentation to support your claims, which is crucial for your motion. You might want to focus on clearly presenting this evidence to show how the court misrepresented your briefs. If you decide to proceed, consulting with a legal professional could be beneficial.
Here's my strategy TO DATE ! (*) I Introduce my evidence confirming a Judicial Environment Biased and Prejudicial to Pro Se Litigants. (*) THEN LINK the body of my Fraud Motion ... in great deal, to how that the Biased, Prejudicial Judicial Environment is demonstrated by my experience and documented evidence relative to my case in Appeals Court. Any thoughts on this or would you add additional details ?
Case Rating: *
Hey ****, your strategy seems solid. Consider these additional points:
- Clearly define what constitutes bias and prejudice in your case.
- Link specific examples from your documentation that illustrate bias.
- Consult a legal expert to refine your argument, ensuring it meets legal standards.
Focusing on clarity and detailed evidence can strengthen your motion.
Hey ****, your strategy seems solid. Consider these additional points:
- Clearly define what constitutes bias and prejudice in your case.
- Link specific examples from your documentation that illustrate bias.
- Consult a legal expert to refine your argument, ensuring it meets legal standards.
Focusing on clarity and detailed evidence can strengthen your motion.
This suggestion I'm not sure where to include those LINKS to specific examples in my documentation that illustrate bias. Would I just write something like an Executive Summary about the LINKS and THEN start the BODY of my Motion ? What do you think ?
Case Rating: *
Hey ****, for your motion, starting with an Executive Summary to highlight key examples of bias could be effective. This provides context before diving into detailed evidence in the body. It helps the reader understand the overall argument before exploring specifics.
Hey ****, for your motion, starting with an Executive Summary to highlight key examples of bias could be effective. This provides context before diving into detailed evidence in the body. It helps the reader understand the overall argument before exploring specifics.
OK I think you are right ! I agree ! It
Case Rating: *
Your approach seems well thought-out, particularly in organizing and presenting evidence of bias. While it's not currently a high-value case for lawyer referral, consulting a legal expert could offer valuable insights for your motion on fraud upon the court. If you need further assistance, feel free to ask!
Your approach seems well thought-out, particularly in organizing and presenting evidence of bias. While it's not currently a high-value case for lawyer referral, consulting a legal expert could offer valuable insights for your motion on fraud upon the court. If you need further assistance, feel free to ask!
When I finish my resaerch and formulate questions, I, initially, sure will seek a free legal consultation. Then decide my next move. Many thanks ! BUT I'm not sure I understand your statement. "While it's not currently a high-value case for lawyer referral, ..." if I'm claining Fraud Upon the Court wouldn't that be a high-value case ?
Case Rating: *
Your case involves complex legal issues, which might not immediately qualify as high-value for referral without more conclusive evidence. Fraud upon the court requires clear and convincing evidence of intentional deception. To strengthen your position, consider consulting a legal professional to better understand the nuances and improve your motion. Would you like more guidance on how to present your case effectively?
Your case involves complex legal issues, which might not immediately qualify as high-value for referral without more conclusive evidence. Fraud upon the court requires clear and convincing evidence of intentional deception. To strengthen your position, consider consulting a legal professional to better understand the nuances and improve your motion. Would you like more guidance on how to present your case effectively?
I see. Yes, pls let me know about presenting my case effectively. Thx
Case Rating: *
To present your case effectively:
- Organize Evidence: Ensure all documentation is well-organized and highlights key points.
- Executive Summary: Begin with a summary to outline your argument.
- Clear Argumentation: Clearly link evidence to claims of bias or fraud.
- Legal Standards: Ensure your argument aligns with legal standards.
- Consultation: Consider seeking legal advice for further refinement.
If you need further assistance, feel free to ask!
To present your case effectively:
- Organize Evidence: Ensure all documentation is well-organized and highlights key points.
- Executive Summary: Begin with a summary to outline your argument.
- Clear Argumentation: Clearly link evidence to claims of bias or fraud.
- Legal Standards: Ensure your argument aligns with legal standards.
- Consultation: Consider seeking legal advice for further refinement.
If you need further assistance, feel free to ask!
OK "- Clear Argumentation: Clearly link evidence to claims of bias or fraud." Now, When I do my linking, what do you think? Should I use Categories of Bias and Prejdice under which I present the appropriate evidence. Or, Should I use some type of Chronology especially considering this Bias was also rampant at the District Court level. It was one of the major factors in my decision to Appeal to the 9th Circuit. Or, I could integrate the history of Bias I experienced by both levels of courts in my Introduction to further support how the whole Judicial Environment motivates Bias and Prejudice ?
Case Rating: *
Hey, it sounds like you're thinking deeply about how to present your case. Here's a suggestion:
- Categories of Bias and Prejudice: This approach clearly defines and organizes evidence, making it easier for the reader to understand specific instances of bias.
- Chronology: Helps in illustrating the progression and impact of bias over time at different court levels.
- Integration in Introduction: Provides a broad context for the systemic issues you're addressing.
Combining categories and chronology can provide a comprehensive view, linking specific examples to a broader narrative.
Hey, it sounds like you're thinking deeply about how to present your case. Here's a suggestion:
- Categories of Bias and Prejudice: This approach clearly defines and organizes evidence, making it easier for the reader to understand specific instances of bias.
- Chronology: Helps in illustrating the progression and impact of bias over time at different court levels.
- Integration in Introduction: Provides a broad context for the systemic issues you're addressing.
Combining categories and chronology can provide a comprehensive view, linking specific examples to a broader narrative.
You know ! Yup, (*) integrate in introduction. THEN, (*) work with the CATEGORIES. BUT, I THINK CATEGORIES COULD DISTRACT FROM a chronology that would reveal an escalating comportment by the judges of Bias and Prejudice. I really have to think over Categories....I c could do some kind of Chronology like Opening Brief under which I break down the breaches into the Categories....what do you think ? A bit too complicated or possibly make a leading logical sequence that readers would quickly follow ? Just batting around some ideas here.
Case Rating: *
Hey ****! Your approach to organizing your case with a chronology that reveals escalating bias could be effective. It allows readers to follow a logical progression and see how issues developed over time. Combining this with categories might help highlight specific breaches. Balancing both could provide a clear narrative.
Hey ****! Your approach to organizing your case with a chronology that reveals escalating bias could be effective. It allows readers to follow a logical progression and see how issues developed over time. Combining this with categories might help highlight specific breaches. Balancing both could provide a clear narrative.
I agree. I have to spend a fair amount of time on how to organize my presentation. for greatest impact on the reader...And, as you note, I think establishing a logical balance may, not sure, be critical in making it very easy to persuade the reader to grasp and agree with my arguments. WHEW !!! Time for a Break ! Se you later. THX
Case Rating: *
Hey ****, it seems like you're working hard on organizing your case effectively. Establishing a logical balance is indeed crucial for making your arguments persuasive. If you need more guidance or have questions later, feel free to reach out. Enjoy your break!
Hey ****, it seems like you're working hard on organizing your case effectively. Establishing a logical balance is indeed crucial for making your arguments persuasive. If you need more guidance or have questions later, feel free to reach out. Enjoy your break!
I sure will enjoy my Break !
Case Rating: *
Hey ****! It looks like you're dealing with a complex situation involving court procedures and potential fraud upon the court. While it's not currently a high-value case for lawyer referral without more conclusive evidence, organizing your evidence effectively is key. If you need more assistance in the future, feel free to reach out! Enjoy your break!
Hey ****! It looks like you're dealing with a complex situation involving court procedures and potential fraud upon the court. While it's not currently a high-value case for lawyer referral without more conclusive evidence, organizing your evidence effectively is key. If you need more assistance in the future, feel free to reach out! Enjoy your break!
THANK YOU *
Case Rating: *
Hey ****, it looks like you're working on a challenging legal situation. Organizing your evidence and presenting your case effectively will be crucial. Feel free to reach out if you have more questions or need further assistance. Enjoy your break!
Hey ****, it looks like you're working on a challenging legal situation. Organizing your evidence and presenting your case effectively will be crucial. Feel free to reach out if you have more questions or need further assistance. Enjoy your break!
You bet !! Now, */* I filed a replacement brief then on */* I filed a MOTION
to File Replacement Brief which appellee struct
Case Rating: *
Hey ****! It seems you're dealing with procedural issues regarding filing briefs. Here's some general info:
- Check court rules for filing briefs to ensure compliance.
- If the appellee struck your motion, verify if procedural errors occurred.
- Consider seeking legal advice for procedural guidance.
Do you have any specific questions about this matter?
Hey ****! It seems you're dealing with procedural issues regarding filing briefs. Here's some general info:
- Check court rules for filing briefs to ensure compliance.
- If the appellee struck your motion, verify if procedural errors occurred.
- Consider seeking legal advice for procedural guidance.
Do you have any specific questions about this matter?
Sorry. 9th Circuit You bet !! Now, */* I filed a replacement brief */* Appellee file Motion to Strike */* I filed a MOTION to File Replacement Brief which appellee struct
Case Rating: *
You're dealing with complex procedural issues. You might want to consider:
- Reviewing the 9th Circuit's rules on filing briefs to ensure proper compliance.
- Seeking clarification on why your motion was struck by the appellee.
Do you have any specific questions about how to address these procedural concerns?
You're dealing with complex procedural issues. You might want to consider:
- Reviewing the 9th Circuit's rules on filing briefs to ensure proper compliance.
- Seeking clarification on why your motion was struck by the appellee.
Do you have any specific questions about how to address these procedural concerns?
Sorry. 9th Circuit You bet !! */* Docket * I filed a MOTION to Supplement or Correct Record However, the Clerk mistakenly corrected the */* Motion with Docket * an irrelevant document. SO, Docket * */* I file a Motion to file replacement Reply Brief */* Appellee filed a Motion to Strike my */* Motion to File Replacement Brief */* i filed a Motion to File Replacement Brief ALSO ON */* Clerk of the Court said the Correct Motion was in fact the */* Motion to file replacement Reply Brief NOW, Since Appellee already filed a motion to Strike */* which the clerk said was Correct I then filed a Motion to File Replacement Brief
Case Rating: *
Hey ****, it sounds like you're navigating a complicated procedural situation. Here are some points to consider:
- Review Court Rules: Ensure all filings comply with the 9th Circuit's specific rules.
- Clerk Communication: Confirm with the clerk regarding the correct motion and any discrepancies.
- Appellee's Motion: Examine why the appellee moved to strike your motion.
Would you like more information on addressing these procedural concerns effectively?
Hey ****, it sounds like you're navigating a complicated procedural situation. Here are some points to consider:
- Review Court Rules: Ensure all filings comply with the 9th Circuit's specific rules.
- Clerk Communication: Confirm with the clerk regarding the correct motion and any discrepancies.
- Appellee's Motion: Examine why the appellee moved to strike your motion.
Would you like more information on addressing these procedural concerns effectively?
Sorry. 9th Circuit You bet !! i think the point i'm trying to make as before is: Why didn't I get any communication about my Motions from the Court ? Again, if Court had read any one of my Motions they'd have proof I made only clerical changes. SO that means the Court's judges didn't read my Motions which confirmed Clerical Changes ONLY, Now FAST-FORWARD TO */*/*. JUDGEMENT DAY. what's WORSE !!! THEY WROTE THEIR JUDGEMENT AT *:* AM THEN AT *:* COURT GRANTED APPELLEE'S MOTION TO STRIKE, THEN DENIED ALL MY PENDING MOTIONS !!! CRAZY, WHY DID THEY BOTHER TO GRANT HIS MOTION TO STRIKE when they'd already written their judgement to dismiss my case ? Any ideas ? Can I raise this as breach of judicial machinery ?
Case Rating: *
Hey ****! You've got a challenging issue with procedural communication and the court's handling of motions. Consider these points:
- Judicial Machinery Breach: If you suspect procedural errors, you might explore whether the court's actions violated established rules.
- Clerical Changes: Ensure your motions clearly highlight clerical corrections.
- Legal Advice: Consulting a legal expert could help in identifying potential breaches or grounds for reconsideration.
If you need more assistance, feel free to ask!
Hey ****! You've got a challenging issue with procedural communication and the court's handling of motions. Consider these points:
- Judicial Machinery Breach: If you suspect procedural errors, you might explore whether the court's actions violated established rules.
- Clerical Changes: Ensure your motions clearly highlight clerical corrections.
- Legal Advice: Consulting a legal expert could help in identifying potential breaches or grounds for reconsideration.
If you need more assistance, feel free to ask!
Thanks.....I didn't know what to call the Court's "crazy" timing sequence of actions. BUT you did it for me !!! Yes Procedural errors. Now, how or where do you think this particular Procedural issue fits in ? Is this procedural error also a breach of Judicial Machinery ? Is this possible procedural error another indication of Pro Se bias & prejudice ? What ado you think ?
Case Rating: *
Hey ****, here's a bit more on your situation:
- Procedural Errors & Judicial Machinery: These might indicate a breach if established court procedures were not followed.
- Pro Se Bias & Prejudice: If procedural errors disproportionately affect pro se litigants, it may suggest bias.
Consider consulting with a legal expert to further explore these possibilities.
Hey ****, here's a bit more on your situation:
- Procedural Errors & Judicial Machinery: These might indicate a breach if established court procedures were not followed.
- Pro Se Bias & Prejudice: If procedural errors disproportionately affect pro se litigants, it may suggest bias.
Consider consulting with a legal expert to further explore these possibilities.
Where can I find established Court procedures FRAP and/or FRAP for 9th Circuit ?
Case Rating: *
You can find the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP) and the specific rules for the 9th Circuit Court on their official website or through legal resources that provide access to court rules. They typically outline procedures for filing motions, briefs, and other appellate practices. Would you like more guidance on navigating these resources?
You can find the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP) and the specific rules for the 9th Circuit Court on their official website or through legal resources that provide access to court rules. They typically outline procedures for filing motions, briefs, and other appellate practices. Would you like more guidance on navigating these resources?
yes pls more guidance !
Case Rating: *
To navigate court resources effectively:
- Visit the official 9th Circuit Court website for specific procedural rules.
- Search for "Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure" online for general guidelines.
- Consider legal databases like Westlaw or LexisNexis for comprehensive access.
If you need more assistance, feel free to ask!
To navigate court resources effectively:
- Visit the official 9th Circuit Court website for specific procedural rules.
- Search for "Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure" online for general guidelines.
- Consider legal databases like Westlaw or LexisNexis for comprehensive access.
If you need more assistance, feel free to ask!
is there a special Rule(s) addressing Procedures in FRAP
Case Rating: *
There are several rules within the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP) that address procedural issues. Here's a brief overview:
- FRAP *: Covers the requirements for briefs, including content and format.
- FRAP *: Addresses form of briefs, appendices, and other documents.
- FRAP *: Discusses oral arguments procedures.
These rules help ensure that procedural aspects are properly followed in appellate cases. If you need further details, you might want to consult legal databases or the court's website for complete information.
There are several rules within the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP) that address procedural issues. Here's a brief overview:
- FRAP *: Covers the requirements for briefs, including content and format.
- FRAP *: Addresses form of briefs, appendices, and other documents.
- FRAP *: Discusses oral arguments procedures.
These rules help ensure that procedural aspects are properly followed in appellate cases. If you need further details, you might want to consult legal databases or the court's website for complete information.
Right...Rule * and * was mentioned earlier ....
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're dealing with procedural complexities in the 9th Circuit. For rules addressing procedures, FRAP * and * are essential for briefs and document formatting. Reviewing these rules thoroughly could help ensure compliance and address procedural concerns effectively. If you require further guidance, feel free to ask!
It sounds like you're dealing with procedural complexities in the 9th Circuit. For rules addressing procedures, FRAP * and * are essential for briefs and document formatting. Reviewing these rules thoroughly could help ensure compliance and address procedural concerns effectively. If you require further guidance, feel free to ask!
WHEW I need another Break ! chocolate chip cookies sound great !
Case Rating: *
Hey, it seems like you're handling a lot with these procedural issues. Taking a break sounds like a great idea—chocolate chip cookies are always a good choice! If you need more guidance later, just let me know. Enjoy your cookies!
Hey, it seems like you're handling a lot with these procedural issues. Taking a break sounds like a great idea—chocolate chip cookies are always a good choice! If you need more guidance later, just let me know. Enjoy your cookies!
thxn i sure will
Case Rating: *
Hey, it sounds like you're really diving into these procedural matters. When you're ready to tackle more, I'm here to help. Enjoy those cookies and take your time! If you have more questions later, feel free to reach out.
Hey, it sounds like you're really diving into these procedural matters. When you're ready to tackle more, I'm here to help. Enjoy those cookies and take your time! If you have more questions later, feel free to reach out.
Sound good ! THX
Case Rating: *
Hey ****, it seems like you're handling intricate procedural issues, especially with the court's timing and response. If you suspect procedural errors indicating bias, consulting a legal expert can be beneficial. When you're ready, feel free to reach out for more guidance or assistance!
Hey ****, it seems like you're handling intricate procedural issues, especially with the court's timing and response. If you suspect procedural errors indicating bias, consulting a legal expert can be beneficial. When you're ready, feel free to reach out for more guidance or assistance!
Start a new chat