Unlawful Council Tax Actions

Sure! Here's a condensed and correctly formatted supplemental witness statement based on the content of your document:
---
Supplemental Witness Statement
Unlawful Actions and Misconduct
I, [Your Name], submit this supplemental witness statement to condemn the unlawful actions taken by Legal Advisors Hughes and Adam Abbot-Smith, along with representatives Scot Robert Fawcus, Miss Emily Lewin, Alan Stoves, and Damian Francis Allen under the City of Doncaster Council at the Administrative Civil National Business Centre (CNBC). These actions have resulted in a significant miscarriage of justice.
Their unlawful handling of my council tax arrears and the imposition of a Charging Order on my property violate established legal standards. This represents a deliberate attempt to seize my principal home, constituting an abuse of power with complete disregard for my legal rights.
Supporting Case Law:
*. R v. Somerset County Council ex parte Dixon [*] * WLR *: Public bodies acting beyond their powers are subject to judicial review.
*. Anufrijeva v. Southwark London Borough Council [*] * AC *: Public authorities must act fairly, and failure to do so results in harm.
*. R (on the application of Lumba) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [*] * AC *: Unlawful actions by public authorities violating legal procedures and human rights cannot stand.
*. Ghaidan v. Godin-Mendoza [*] * AC *: Failing to accommodate protected characteristics, such as disability, is discriminatory and unlawful.
*. R (on the application of Coughlan) v. North and East Devon Health Authority [*] * All ER *: Public authorities must act transparently, justly, and in good faith.
*. R v. Leeds City Council [*] EWCA Civ *: Council enforcement actions must be fair and proportionate.
Unlawful Use of Single Justice Procedure
The decision to process my council tax debt under the Single Justice Procedure is a fundamental abuse of process, resulting in a miscarriage of justice. This procedure, designed for minor criminal offences, is unsuitable for civil financial matters such as council tax arrears, violating my right to a fair trial under Article * of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
Supporting Case Law:
*. R v. Bexley Magistrates' Court [*] EWHC * (Admin): Single Justice Procedure is inappropriate for civil debts.
*. R (on the application of S) v. London Borough of Hackney [*] EWHC * (Admin): Application of procedures outside their intended scope constitutes a misuse of public power.
Failure to Produce a Lawful Liability Order
The issuance of binding legal orders by the CNBC violates my fundamental right to a fair hearing under Article * ECHR, as it is not a judicial body. Decisions affecting legal rights, especially regarding property, must be made by an independent and impartial tribunal.
Supporting Case Law:
*. Findlay v. United Kingdom [*] * EHRR *: Decisions involving property must be made by an independent tribunal.
*. Piersack v. Belgium [*] ECHR *: Need for actual and apparent independence and impartiality of any tribunal.
*. R (on the application of McCall) v. The Lord Chancellor [*] EWHC * (Admin): Decisions by non-judicial bodies compromise fairness.
Unlawfully Rejected N244 Submission
On * November *, I submitted an N244 application to Doncaster County Court challenging the unlawful Interim Charging Order issued by the CNBC. My submission was returned without formal explanation, constituting a denial of justice and procedural fairness.
Supporting Case Law:
*. R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody [*] * AC *: Procedural fairness requires a fair opportunity to present one's case.
*. R v. Bow Street Magistrates' Court, ex parte Choudhury [*] * QB *: Failure to process or consider an application on its merits could render the decision void.
Unlawful Issuance of Final Charging Order
On * January *, the CNBC unlawfully issued a Final Charging Order against my home without judicial involvement, violating established legal procedures and my rights under Article * ECHR.
Supporting Case Law:
*. R (on the application of A) v. HM Treasury [*] UKSC *: Judicial discretion cannot be transferred to non-judicial bodies.
*. R (on the application of McCall) v. The Lord Chancellor [*] EWHC * (Admin): Administrative bodies do not have the authority to issue binding legal orders.
*. Findlay v. United Kingdom [*] * EHRR *: Importance of judicial independence and impartiality in decisions affecting property rights.
I respectfully request that the court review and rectify the unlawful actions described, ensuring that justice is served.
[Your Signature]
[Your Name]
[Date]
---
This format condenses and organizes the key points while maintaining the necessary legal references and arguments.

Sure! Here are the case law references with short descriptions:
*. R v. Somerset County Council ex parte Dixon [*] * WLR *: Public bodies acting beyond their powers are subject to judicial review.
*. Anufrijeva v. Southwark London Borough Council [*] * AC *: Public authorities must act fairly, and failure to do so results in harm.
*. R (on the application of Lumba) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [*] * AC *: Unlawful actions by public authorities violating legal procedures and human rights cannot stand.
*. Ghaidan v. Godin-Mendoza [*] * AC *: Failing to accommodate protected characteristics, such as disability, is discriminatory and unlawful.
*. R (on the application of Coughlan) v. North and East Devon Health Authority [*] * All ER *: Public authorities must act transparently, justly, and in good faith.
*. R v. Leeds City Council [*] EWCA Civ *: Council enforcement actions must be fair and proportionate.
*. R v. Bexley Magistrates' Court [*] EWHC * (Admin): Single Justice Procedure is inappropriate for civil debts.
*. R (on the application of S) v. London Borough of Hackney [*] EWHC * (Admin): Application of procedures outside their intended scope constitutes a misuse of public power.
*. Findlay v. United Kingdom [*] * EHRR *: Decisions involving property must be made by an independent tribunal.
*. Piersack v. Belgium [*] ECHR *: Need for actual and apparent independence and impartiality of any tribunal.
*. R (on the application of McCall) v. The Lord Chancellor [*] EWHC * (Admin): Decisions by non-judicial bodies compromise fairness.
*. R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody [*] * AC *: Procedural fairness requires a fair opportunity to present one's case.
*. R v. Bow Street Magistrates' Court, ex parte Choudhury [*] * QB *: Failure to process or consider an application on its merits could render the decision void.
*. R (on the application of A) v. HM Treasury [*] UKSC *: Judicial discretion cannot be transferred to non-judicial bodies.
These descriptions should help clarify the relevance of each case law reference in your statement.

Case Rating: *
The complete PDF you uploaded has strong legal arguments supported by relevant case law. However, it is important to ensure the document is concise, clear, and well-structured. The court prefers focused, well-organized submissions. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?

Case Rating: *
Certainly! Here is a concise and well-structured version of your document, keeping all the content:
---
Supplemental Witness Statement
*. Unlawful Actions and Misconduct
I, [Your Name], submit this supplemental witness statement to condemn the unlawful actions taken by Legal Advisors Hughes and Adam Abbot-Smith, along with representatives Scot Robert Fawcus, Miss Emily Lewin, Alan Stoves, and Damian Francis Allen under the City of Doncaster Council at the Administrative Civil National Business Centre (CNBC). These actions have resulted in a significant miscarriage of justice.
Their unlawful handling of my council tax arrears and the imposition of a Charging Order on my property violate established legal standards. This represents a deliberate attempt to seize my principal home, constituting an abuse of power with complete disregard for my legal rights.
Supporting Case Law:
*. R v. Somerset County Council ex parte Dixon [*] * WLR *: Public bodies acting beyond their powers are subject to judicial review.
*. Anufrijeva v. Southwark London Borough Council [*] * AC *: Public authorities must act fairly, and failure to do so results in harm.
*. R (on the application of Lumba) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [*] * AC *: Unlawful actions by public authorities violating legal procedures and human rights cannot stand.
*. Ghaidan v. Godin-Mendoza [*] * AC *: Failing to accommodate protected characteristics, such as disability, is discriminatory and unlawful.
*. R (on the application of Coughlan) v. North and East Devon Health Authority [*] * All ER *: Public authorities must act transparently, justly, and in good faith.
*. R v. Leeds City Council [*] EWCA Civ *: Council enforcement actions must be fair and proportionate.
*. Unlawful Use of Single Justice Procedure
The decision to process my council tax debt under the Single Justice Procedure is a fundamental abuse of process, resulting in a miscarriage of justice. This procedure, designed for minor criminal offences, is unsuitable for civil financial matters such as council tax arrears, violating my right to a fair trial under Article * of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
Supporting Case Law:
*. R v. Bexley Magistrates' Court [*] EWHC * (Admin): Single Justice Procedure is inappropriate for civil debts.
*. R (on the application of S) v. London Borough of Hackney [*] EWHC * (Admin): Application of procedures outside their intended scope constitutes a misuse of public power.
*. Failure to Produce a Lawful Liability Order
The issuance of binding legal orders by the CNBC violates my fundamental right to a fair hearing under Article * ECHR, as it is not a judicial body. Decisions affecting legal rights, especially regarding property, must be made by an independent and impartial tribunal.
Supporting Case Law:
*. Findlay v. United Kingdom [*] * EHRR *: Decisions involving property must be made by an independent tribunal.
*. Piersack v. Belgium [*] ECHR *: Need for actual and apparent independence and impartiality of any tribunal.
*. R (on the application of McCall) v. The Lord Chancellor [*] EWHC * (Admin): Decisions by non-judicial bodies compromise fairness.
*. Unlawfully Rejected N244 Submission
On * November *, I submitted an N244 application to Doncaster County Court challenging the unlawful Interim Charging Order issued by the CNBC. My submission was returned without formal explanation, constituting a denial of justice and procedural fairness.
Supporting Case Law:
*. R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody [*] * AC *: Procedural fairness requires a fair opportunity to present one's case.
*. R v. Bow Street Magistrates' Court, ex parte Choudhury [*] * QB *: Failure to process or consider an application on its merits could render the decision void.
*. Unlawful Issuance of Final Charging Order
On * January *, the CNBC unlawfully issued a Final Charging Order against my home without judicial involvement, violating established legal procedures and my rights under Article * ECHR.
Supporting Case Law:
*. R (on the application of A) v. HM Treasury [*] UKSC *: Judicial discretion cannot be transferred to non-judicial bodies.
*. R (on the application of McCall) v. The Lord Chancellor [*] EWHC * (Admin): Administrative bodies do not have the authority to issue binding legal orders.
*. Findlay v. United Kingdom [*] * EHRR *: Importance of judicial independence and impartiality in decisions affecting property rights.
I respectfully request that the court review and rectify the unlawful actions described, ensuring that justice is served.
[Your Signature]
[Your Name]
[Date]
---
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?

Case Rating: *
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
To proceed, can you please provide me with the following details:
- What is your phone number?
- What is your name?
- What is your zipcode?
- What is your email address (optional)?

Case Rating: *
Got it, let's focus on restructuring your document and including damages. Here's a revised version:
---
Supplemental Witness Statement
*. Unlawful Actions and Misconduct
I, [Your Name], submit this supplemental witness statement to condemn the unlawful actions taken by Legal Advisors Hughes and Adam Abbot-Smith, along with representatives Scot Robert Fawcus, Miss Emily Lewin, Alan Stoves, and Damian Francis Allen under the City of Doncaster Council at the Administrative Civil National Business Centre (CNBC). These actions have resulted in a significant miscarriage of justice. Their unlawful handling of my council tax arrears and the imposition of a Charging Order on my property violate established legal standards, representing a deliberate attempt to seize my principal home, constituting an abuse of power with complete disregard for my legal rights.
Supporting Case Law:
*. R v. Somerset County Council ex parte Dixon [*] * WLR *: Public bodies acting beyond their powers are subject to judicial review.
*. Anufrijeva v. Southwark London Borough Council [*] * AC *: Public authorities must act fairly, and failure to do so results in harm.
*. R (on the application of Lumba) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [*] * AC *: Unlawful actions by public authorities violating legal procedures and human rights cannot stand.
*. Ghaidan v. Godin-Mendoza [*] * AC *: Failing to accommodate protected characteristics, such as disability, is discriminatory and unlawful.
*. R (on the application of Coughlan) v. North and East Devon Health Authority [*] * All ER *: Public authorities must act transparently, justly, and in good faith.
*. R v. Leeds City Council [*] EWCA Civ *: Council enforcement actions must be fair and proportionate.
*. Unlawful Use of Single Justice Procedure
The decision to process my council tax debt under the Single Justice Procedure is a fundamental abuse of process, resulting in a miscarriage of justice. This procedure, designed for minor criminal offences, is unsuitable for civil financial matters such as council tax arrears, violating my right to a fair trial under Article * of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
Supporting Case Law:
*. R v. Bexley Magistrates' Court [*] EWHC * (Admin): Single Justice Procedure is inappropriate for civil debts.
*. R (on the application of S) v. London Borough of Hackney [*] EWHC * (Admin): Application of procedures outside their intended scope constitutes a misuse of public power.
*. Failure to Produce a Lawful Liability Order
The issuance of binding legal orders by the CNBC violates my fundamental right to a fair hearing under Article * ECHR, as it is not a judicial body. Decisions affecting legal rights, especially regarding property, must be made by an independent and impartial tribunal.
Supporting Case Law:
*. Findlay v. United Kingdom [*] * EHRR *: Decisions involving property must be made by an independent tribunal.
*. Piersack v. Belgium [*] ECHR *: Need for actual and apparent independence and impartiality of any tribunal.
*. R (on the application of McCall) v. The Lord Chancellor [*] EWHC * (Admin): Decisions by non-judicial bodies compromise fairness.
*. Unlawfully Rejected N244 Submission
On * November *, I submitted an N244 application to Doncaster County Court challenging the unlawful Interim Charging Order issued by the CNBC. My submission was returned without formal explanation, constituting a denial of justice and procedural fairness.
Supporting Case Law:
*. R v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody [*] * AC *: Procedural fairness requires a fair opportunity to present one's case.
*. R v. Bow Street Magistrates' Court, ex parte Choudhury [*] * QB *: Failure to process or consider an application on its merits could render the decision void.
*. Unlawful Issuance of Final Charging Order
On * January *, the CNBC unlawfully issued a Final Charging Order against my home without judicial involvement, violating established legal procedures and my rights under Article * ECHR.
Supporting Case Law:
*. R (on the application of A) v. HM Treasury [*] UKSC *: Judicial discretion cannot be transferred to non-judicial bodies.
*. R (on the application of McCall) v. The Lord Chancellor [*] EWHC * (Admin): Administrative bodies do not have the authority to issue binding legal orders.
*. Findlay v. United Kingdom [*] * EHRR *: Importance of judicial independence and impartiality in decisions affecting property rights.
*. Damages
I seek damages for the distress, financial loss, and inconvenience caused by the unlawful actions of the City of Doncaster Council and CNBC. The actions have led to significant emotional distress, financial instability, and a breach of my fundamental rights.
I respectfully request that the court review and rectify the unlawful actions described, ensuring that justice is served.
[Your Signature]
[Your Name]
[Date]
---
Would you need any further adjustments?