Ineffective Counsel Habeas Corpus

Summary

If an attorney is found ineffective in one case, it could potentially apply to related cases, especially if they share the same trial information. This is a complex issue, and consulting a legal professional is recommended for personalized advice.

Full Conversation

Yes so both cases being the same, rather than only a date difference, the same attorney presiding, found ineffective in habeas corpus after as to one of the split cases, but not the other is a violation, because both cases was ato onetrial.
It sounds like you're dealing with a complex situation involving habeas corpus, ineffective counsel, and split cases. To clarify, did the ineffective counsel ruling occur in Pennsylvania?
yes, and it was for two split cases at one trial where the federal magistrate found him ineffective in federal court habeas corpus as to one case of the split cases at one trial, but he should be found ineffective as to both because they are the same and at onetrial
It seems like you're dealing with a complex situation. In Pennsylvania, ineffective counsel claims are evaluated under the two-pronged Strickland test:
- Deficient performance by counsel
- Pre****udice as a result of counsel's deficient performance
If both cases were handled by the same counsel in the same trial, it's possible that ineffective counsel could be applied to both. However, this is a complex matter and you should seek advice from a legal professional.
both cases was split from each other, and further, from ****uvenile, but this attorney presided over, both at one trial non ****ury
It sounds like you're in a complex situation. In Pennsylvania, the decision on whether ineffective counsel applies to both cases would depend on the specific circumstances. It's recommended to consult with a legal professional who can provide tailored advice based on the details of your case.
if counsel in pa is found inneffective as to a case at trial in taints the whole trial with ineffectiveness
In Pennsylvania, if a lawyer is found ineffective in one case, it doesn't necessarily mean that the whole trial is tainted with ineffectiveness. However, this could potentially be argued depending on the specific details and circumstances of your case. I recommend consulting with a legal professional for tailored advice.
yes in pa
I understand. In Pennsylvania, if a lawyer is found to be ineffective, it may indeed impact the entire trial. However, the specifics of each case play a significant role in this determination. It is advisable to consult with a legal professional for personalized advice.
yes it does becasue they are the same cases with only a date difference,the alleged conduct and charges are the same in both dockets split from on information stemming from ****uvenile.
It seems you're dealing with a complex situation. In Pennsylvania, the determination of ineffective counsel can indeed impact multiple cases if they're closely related. However, the specifics of each case are crucial. It's recommended to consult with a legal professional who can provide personalized advice.
there exaclty related and run at the same time, usingthesame trial information so if he was ineffective in one, he had to be ineffective in the other automatically
I understand your situation better now. As per Pennsylvania law, if cases are closely related and handled by the same counsel, an ineffective counsel ruling could potentially apply to both. This is a complex issue and you should consult with a legal professional for more personalized advice.
yes so in habeas corpus he was found ineffective, he then was ineffective in the other same case, in this scenarion all information fro both was derived from the same trial
In Pennsylvania, if the same attorney was found ineffective in one case, it could potentially apply to a related case, especially if they were part of the same trial. However, legal specifics can vary. I recommend consulting with a legal professional for personalized advice.
basically ifthe attorney was found ineffective at trial for failingto get evidence for onecase, he was ineffective in the other bydefault
I understand your perspective. In Pennsylvania, if an attorney is found ineffective in one case, it could potentially apply to a related case under similar circumstances. However, this is a complex issue and you should consult with a legal professional for more personalized advice.
it does apply
Given your circumstances, it's plausible that ineffective counsel could apply to both cases in Pennsylvania. However, the court's decision will depend on specific details. I strongly recommend consulting with a legal professional for more tailored advice.
It was one trial of information, that information was used in both cases, and that means, the evidence not retrieved would have had an impact on both cases, and therefore he is ineffective as to both by default if nothing else. To which it was argued improperly.
I understand your concern. In Pennsylvania, if the same attorney represented both cases in a single trial, and was found ineffective in one, it could potentially impact the other. However, the interpretation of ineffective counsel can vary greatly. Consult a legal professional for personalized advice.