Summary
Section 2-615 of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure is used to challenge the legal sufficiency of a complaint, not to strike evidence or reconsider child support orders. If you believe this statute is being misapplied in your case, it is advisable to consult a local attorney for clarification and guidance.Full Conversation
What is *-* Of the Illinois code of civil states used against is it used against striking evidence and pleadings or in motion to reconsider child support
Hello Lula, Section *-* of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure concerns motions to dismiss for insufficiency of a complaint. It is generally used to challenge the legal sufficiency of a claim, not for striking evidence or reconsidering child support orders.
The opposing party who is the non-custodial parent‘s attorney filed a motion to strike my evidence that I have provided to the child support judge along with my motion to reconsider and she put this in her motion to strike my evidence *-* Of the Illinois code But these are used against the pleadings not motion to reconsider child support in child support evidence of finances
Hello Lula, it appears there may be a misunderstanding with the application of Section *-*. It is typically used to dismiss a claim due to legal insufficiency, not to strike evidence. You may want to consult a local attorney to discuss this in more detail.
She also used 735cs */*-*
Hello Lula, * ILCS */*-* is the Illinois statute for a Motion to Dismiss, which challenges the legal sufficiency of a claim, not to strike evidence. If you believe it's misused, consider seeking legal advice locally.
I’m trying to find out if that can be used against evidence I provided along with my motion to reconsider child support as this is not pleadings
Hello Lula, in general, * ILCS */*-* is not typically used to strike evidence provided in a motion to reconsider child support. It focuses on the legal insufficiency of a claim. You may want to consult a local attorney to clarify its use in your case.
All the documented evidence I’ve provided are not claims or allegations they’re documented evidence as facts
Hello Lula, it seems like there's some confusion about the usage of * ILCS */*-*. Normally, this statute is not used to dispute factual evidence. Rather, it's used to challenge the legal sufficiency of a complaint. Consulting a local attorney might provide clarity on this matter.