Cook County Child Support Priorities
Summary
In Cook County, Illinois, child support judges prioritize the childs best interests, considering parents financial abilities and documented evidence. If a judge appears biased, you can file a Motion for Substitution of Judge for cause, providing evidence of bias. The Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (750 ILCS 5/) governs these proceedings. Consult a legal advisor for personalized guidance.Full Conversation
Can you tell me and explain our Chicago Illinois cook county child support judges strictly child support judges Who are they supposed to be prioritizing cases are they supposed to be prioritizing the respondents meaning the non-custodial parents best interests and needs and well-being
Hello Alisa. In Cook County, Illinois, child support judges prioritize the best interests of the child above all. They consider factors like the financial ability of both parents, the child's needs, and the standard of living the child would have had if the parents were together. The non-custodial parent's well-being is considered, but the child's needs are paramount.
Is there an Illinois state statute law that states that or any Illinois rules that state what you just mentioned
Yes, the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (* ILCS */) governs child support. Key points:
- Section * focuses on child support and factors for considerations.
- The best interests of the child are prioritized (Section *.*).
- Non-custodial parent's ability to pay is considered (Section *(a)(*)).
For exact details, you can refer to the Illinois Compiled Statutes.
- Section * focuses on child support and factors for considerations.
- The best interests of the child are prioritized (Section *.*).
- Non-custodial parent's ability to pay is considered (Section *(a)(*)).
For exact details, you can refer to the Illinois Compiled Statutes.
So for example eight Chicago Illinois county child support judge is prioritizing the interests and needs of the Non-custodial parent meaning this judge expedites and grants baseless motions for the non-custodial parent based on hearsay no evidence whatsoever but motions that I have filed in the best interest of the children and their needs and their well-being are being put on the back burner by discharge as she is setting for month out hearing dates for the respondents baseless motions
I understand your frustration, Alisa. If you feel a judge is not adhering to the governing laws, you can consider appealing the decision or filing a complaint against the judge. This would involve presenting evidence to support your claims. Always consult with a legal advisor for personalized advice.
Is a child support judge supposed to make rulings based on hearsay with no documented evidence or as a child support judge supposed to actually look at documented evidence in the best interest of the child or children
In Illinois, a child support judge should primarily consider the best interests of the child, based on documented evidence, not hearsay. Any rulings should follow the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act, prioritizing the child's needs and parents' financial abilities.
Is a child support judge supposed to be making rulings based on hearsay or is the judge supposed to be making rulings with actual documented evidence Because I see it as if the judge is making her rulings based on hearsay and refuses to look at documented evidence she’s bias and is not prioritizing the children’s well-being or best interest or needs
In Illinois, judges must base their rulings on factual, documented evidence, not hearsay. If you believe the judge is biased, you can file a complaint or appeal the decision. It's advisable to consult with a legal advisor for further guidance.
Can you explain to me in detail how this type of behavior or actions from a child support judge affects The well-being and best interest of teenage children particularly teenagers aged * through *
If a judge prioritizes the non-custodial parent's interests over the child's, it may result in:
- Inadequate financial support, affecting the child's education, health, and overall development.
- Emotional distress due to perceived favoritism.
- Possible neglect of child's needs.
It's essential to consult with a legal advisor to understand the full implications.
- Inadequate financial support, affecting the child's education, health, and overall development.
- Emotional distress due to perceived favoritism.
- Possible neglect of child's needs.
It's essential to consult with a legal advisor to understand the full implications.
For example if this child support case was intentionally dragged on by the opposing party the opposing party neglected the children for over * */2 years meaning financially and emotionally as he has not visited the children or seen the children or checked on the children does not send anything or provide anything for the children and the judge makes a ruling based on hearsay that can be proven that it was intentional misleading information and the judge continue citing with the respondent what does that cost teenage children that have been struggling for over * */2 years and is continuing due to the judges actions and behavior
The prolonged legal process and perceived bias of the judge could lead to:
- Increased emotional distress for the children.
- Financial instability, potentially affecting lifestyle and education.
- Feelings of abandonment and neglect due to the non-custodial parent's lack of involvement.
Consult a legal advisor for specific advice.
- Increased emotional distress for the children.
- Financial instability, potentially affecting lifestyle and education.
- Feelings of abandonment and neglect due to the non-custodial parent's lack of involvement.
Consult a legal advisor for specific advice.
Do child support judges even take into consideration the best interests needs and well-being of teenage children particularly * through *-year-olds
Yes, child support judges should take into consideration the best interests, needs, and well-being of all children, including teenagers aged *-*. This is mandated by the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (* ILCS */), specifically Section *.*. The child's age does not exempt them from these considerations.
This judge expedited and granted a motion to impound records meaning evidence that were electronically uploaded based on the opposing parties attorney falsely claiming that the respondents routing number and Account number are on cashier checks now it is a known fact that cashier checks do not have the respondents personal routing number or account number but the judge granted Them to impound records
I understand your concern, Alisa. If you believe the judge is making improper or incorrect rulings, you can appeal the decision or file a complaint. Consult with a legal advisor for specific, tailored advice. It's crucial to have sufficient evidence to support your claims.
I want two substitute a judge for cause So that this case can be expedited and a different judge can actually look at documented evidence and make the correct ruling
In Illinois, you can file a Motion for Substitution of Judge (* ILCS */*-*). Here are the key points:
- You can request it once without stating a cause.
- If requested more than once, you must prove the judge's legal prejudice.
- The motion should be filed before the judge makes a substantial ruling.
Consult a legal advisor for tailored advice.
- You can request it once without stating a cause.
- If requested more than once, you must prove the judge's legal prejudice.
- The motion should be filed before the judge makes a substantial ruling.
Consult a legal advisor for tailored advice.
Can I file a motion to substitute a judge for cause for a bias As everything she has been doing points to she is bias she prioritizes the non-custodial parent who is miss leading the court through his attorney over the children’s well-being based on hearsay
Yes, in Illinois, you can file a Motion for Substitution of Judge for cause if you believe the judge is biased. Key points:
- You must provide evidence of the judge's bias.
- The motion must be filed as soon as you become aware of the bias.
- It's advisable to consult a legal advisor for specific guidance.
- You must provide evidence of the judge's bias.
- The motion must be filed as soon as you become aware of the bias.
- It's advisable to consult a legal advisor for specific guidance.
I realize that the judge is biased 12 days ago after the judge expedited the motion for the respondent to impound records based on fast information The judge also ordered me angrily to provide the non-custodial parent with my daughters identification pin so that he may claim her on his tax returns I explain to the judge that the non-custodial parent has been financially exploiting the children she told me that it was not my place to accuse the non-custodial parent of financially abusing the children and that he did not need to send any of the tax money he collects on children he has neglected financially and emotionally for over * */2 years that was alarming tact meant and clearly told me that this charge does not give a damn about the children who she is directly impacting with her rulings based on hearsay This judge also stated that she does not wanna look at bank statements or receipts I would say she is bias
I understand your concerns, Alisa. In Illinois, if you believe a judge is acting with bias, you can file a Motion for Substitution of Judge for cause. Remember:
- Evidence of bias is required.
- File as soon as bias is perceived.
- Legal advice is recommended.
- Evidence of bias is required.
- File as soon as bias is perceived.
- Legal advice is recommended.
The judges behavior and actions clearly indicates that she has given the respondent the greenlight to financially exploit the children also indicated to him he will not be held accountable for providing false information to the child support court Also indicated to the non-custodial parent that he may commit tax evasion is a child support judge supposed to be doing that
No, a child support judge should not encourage or condone illegal activities like financial exploitation or tax evasion. They should prioritize the child’s best interests, basing rulings on factual, documented evidence. If you believe the judge is acting improperly, consider filing a complaint or appealing the decision. Legal advice is recommended.