Impersonation In Legal Case

But his financial disclosure does not list that he purchased the townhome under their names and only list the reason he with Drew the * from his account which he demonstrated down payment for a new home

Let’s change the subject how would I simply state my third reason being asset concealment

For my fourth reason how would What I state that his bank statements show large amounts of money that was going in and out of his accounts meaning as in his expensive lifestyle money being diverted to his girlfriend via Zell and to her sons via Apple Cash

So for example I filed for child support against the non-custodial parent through the state on July *, * as it took the state nine months to send me the pamphlet and the respondent couldn’t be found to be served when he was finally found and served in September * * our first hearing was on January *, * and since then this case was dragged on by the noncustodial parent refusing to comply with discovery demanding the children’s DNA so I need this judge to also consider his bank statements showing large amounts of money being spent out of his accounts and going into his account for example his bank statements from * And * not only * and *

So how would I listed as my reason number for

I need to state some thing before listing my fourth reason as to explain so the judge can understand that I filed through HFS on July *, * although it took HFS nine months to send out the template to me the court documents show my signature dated an April * the court documents will also show that the county sheriff attempted to serve the respondent at his last known address on May *, * which was unsuccessful and his whereabouts were listed as unknown until he was finally found and served on September *, * and our first hearing being set for January *, * and has since been dragged on so those documents meaning his bank records should also be considered as the bank statements he provided to the states attorney falsely claiming he did not make enough money while his hidden account showed over $*,* being spent so they should be considered as the children were financially deprived since July *, *

Or should I list my farts reason and then write that under

I think I will list all my reasons and then write that at the ending that way I don’t confuse the judge

So will change reason for for now to The respondents girlfriend impersonating him through emails to the children who has intentionally inflicted dangerously serious financial emotional psychological and mental distress on the children since July *, * as the judge already read some of the emails I will be attaching an email That directly proves that the girlfriend has been impersonating him to the children as the beginning of the email looks as if it was written by the respondent at the end of the email it states your father and i Clearly prove it she is impersonating the respondent and that email was about making the children get DNA tested proving she is the one that wanted the children’s DNA not to respond

I wanted to be more straightforward as this email that was directed at the children was about the children being made to get DNA tested and at the end of the email as she stated your father and I she gave herself away

Can I just state an email attached will also provide proof that all the emails are written by the girlfriend and not the respondent as she has been impersonating The respondent as the email provided will show she was the one that wanted the children’s DNA as She in vertically revealed herself in the attached email

I need to phrase it in a better way that clearly states all the emails were in fact written by the girlfriend impersonating the respondent as this attached email will clearly prove she has been writing the emails and she is the one that wanted the children’s DNA proving she has been interfering in this case and with the children’s well-being for self benefit

To clarify it a little bit better this email was directed At the children after the fact that the children had to be taken to get DNA tested

I want to phrase it more this way The respondent's girlfriend has been impersonating him in emails, as evidenced by the attached email. This email not only reveals her desire for the children's DNA testing but also her interference in the case and detrimental impact on the children, for personal gain." This email was sent to the children are directed at the children after they were DNA tested proving she was the one that wanted the children’s DNA inflicting even more damage onto them

I don’t think you’re understanding me so for example if the respondents girlfriend is impersonating him through emails making it look as if he’s the one writing them when in fact it is her her intention and intentions were and are clearly to intentionally inflict financial emotional psychological and mental distress onto the children for the benefit of herself and her sons and to alienate the children from their father which she succeeded in since July *, * How would you explain this and what is this called

Well actually it is both as this woman succeeded in having the respondent diverting all his money to her and her sons the respondents three biological children were financially emotionally psychologically and mentally deprived and alienated from their father as any attempt to contact him they were immediately threatened with the police with harassment reports

Now with that how do I freeze my first reason in my motion to comply the respondents attendance as I will be attaching an email that directly proves that the respondents girlfriend has in fact been impersonating the respondent As the email directed to the children after they were made to go for DNA testing where she revealed herself by stating your father and i

Do you know what let’s just rephrase this how old are you phrase my first reason being for filing my motion to compel the respondents attendance is for the fact that the girlfriend has been impersonating the respondent through emails interfering in this case and in the children’s well-being as an email attached will provide proof that it is in fact the girlfriend impersonating the respondent as this email was directed at the children after they were made to go for DNA testing where is she introvert kindly gave her self away