Child Support Judge Misconduct

I have some questions regarding a child support judge in Illinois. Is a child support judge? Supposed to be making verbal. statement such as. making excuses for the respondents direct proof. on his bank statements. of consistent transfers to a spouse. is a child support judge. Supposed to be making verbal statements to a self representing petitioner that they do not understand the law when clearly they do is a child support judge supposed to be ignoring and dismissing that relevant documented evidence when it comes to retroactive child support payments, ongoing child support payments and Educational expenses such as. college expenses. is the child support judge supposed to be making verbal statements? such as the boys will To work to cover their college tuition.

Is the child support supposed to be stating? everyone's struggles. and shrugging her shoulders. Now I wanna know. if she's supposed to doing this. Yes or no? especially given the fact that this court does not have a court reporter. by a zoom or in person or any transcripts via zoom or in person.

Is a child support judge supposed to? make verbal statements such as in her own opinion? believing the respondent can't afford college education? without ever even looking at evidence or considering it?

So basically your answer to all my questions are no, the judge is not supposed to be doing this. Am I correct?

Now I wanna know your first initial thoughts on this situation. So if the judge makes statements such as. the respondent can't afford college expenses. such as tuition, clothing, transportation and sports. accessories. but then the judge receives subpoenaed auto loan and motorcycle loan records showing. that the respondent was able to pay off his motorcycle and auto early$*,* for the vehicle. * */* thousand dollar down payment for the motorcycle and fully paying get off with almost $* within a month and a half. What would this say about the judge? What would you think

No, I do not want to discuss it with an attorney or a lawyer. Um, just asking questions So I can fully understand what a child support judge is supposed to be doing and is not supposed to be doing.

Is a child support judge supposed to be squashing subpoenas for relevant. bank records. that would show the respondents actual income and attempting to hold petitioner in contempt. for lawfully subpoenaing those records yes or no

Now let's say that I choose to file a formal complete against this judge. where I want to include what I filed with the court Along with the attachments of evidence. what are opposing party filed? And the signed court orders. of the judges rulings.

Now I want to know. because everything I want to provide directly prove evidence. was never looked at Evidence is not being looked at evidence. is being ignored. The children were cheated or cheated out of retroactive child support payments. Were cheated out of the proper amount of ongoing child support payments. The children were forced to. get student loans. Wouldn't all this say that this judge is not prioritizing the children Or there well being. or needs? yes or no

Is a child support judge supposed to be inflicting further financial hardship on the children involved?

What are your initial thoughts? Or what would you say? if a child support judge believes that lawfully subpoenaing relevant bank. rupt bank records for her to hold an emergency hearing without the petitioner? and hold the petitioner in contempt? Wouldn't you say she's keeping? or helping the respondent keep hidden income? Isn't that hurting the children even more?

So if you were one of the board members. and you see all that evidence directly showing everything I've just stated. what would you think?

I asked you to pretend if you were one of the board members. and you see you're presented with evidence. of the judge doing everything I've just stated. Would you question the judge? What to investigate the judge?

Are you aware or is it? made public anywhere that? a Illinois child support judge? that there was formal complaints filed against them and were investigated?

I also want to know. is a child support judge supposed to falsely state in her own drafted court order that there was a hearing conducted for one of the motions when in fact there was not? but there's no court recorder and there's no transcripts available for this court room whether it's on zoom or in person.

I also want to know now. as this is a ongoing child support case pertaining to retroactive child support payments. ongoing child support payments and college expenses. and I lawfully Get subpoenas stamped by the clerk and submit them to. the banks or loan banks for the respondent Am I harassing him?

I wanna read. what the respondent sent to the judge via email. and I wanna know your initial thoughts. Respondent states Once again, we are doing the subpoena of my personal account. I asked you, your honor, to please stop this. Because this is nonsense. and this continues to go on. I believe you put a stop to this regarding my personal information. I would kindly ask the court to put a stop to this harassment that's been continuing. Not only that my personal information. but practitioner has been using this to harass me using my personal bank records.

No, you didn't understand me. That is what the respondent. sent to the judge via email.

And the judges response to that email from the respondent was. as follows. she drafted an order and emailed it. This matter coming to be heard on emergency motion, which I was not part of. Holding me contempt. for issuing a lawful subpoena. Now it's kind of alarming to what the respondents sent to the judge via email and the judges response. was to squash the subpoena and to hold me contempt.

I wanna know your thoughts on the email from the respondent. to the judge on March *. * and the judges response. dated March * *

No. If the judge allows me or allowed me to subpoena. the respondents, motorcycle loan records. and other loan records. but directed me to have the loan departments sent. the documents directly to her for her review. as the goal was to uncover that the respondent does in fact have a higher and hidden income.

And the judge receives the motorcycle loan records. early September *. and gives them to me for my review December * * now when I received them and reviewed the documents they clearly State. The respondent made a cash down payment of * */* thousand dollars for the motorcycle. And fully paid it off. with almost $* and less than two months. which his Chase Bank Records

The judge also receives. the respondents are alone records. on March * * * for her review to uncover higher or hidden income and the documents were given to me. 5 days later, upon my reviewing of the documents They contain notifications of early payoff. account paid in full. with a lump sum of $*,*.

Wouldn't those documents prove to the judge that the respondent does, in fact, have a higher and hidden income?

The judge ignored that evidence. and chose to hold me in contempt for submitting a subpoena. and squashed the subpoena. Now, what does this say? What do you think of this judge's actions?

Doesn't it seem like the judge is actually helping the respondent? Keep his higher income hidden and undiscoverd

What would you say if I were to tell you that those documents show that the respondent made a lump sum early payoff of. the vehicle *. een $* on August * which is the same time I was asking the court to order the respondent to cover college expenses. for the children. but the respondent was not over ordered to cover tuition, books, clothing, transportation or anything else for the children because the judge believed the respondent can't afford it. So the children were forced to get student loans. The respondent was not ordered to contribute or cover away. tuition, any other. expenses. for attending college clothes. clothing, transportation, sports. Nothing.

Let's pretend you're an actual attorney. What would you say about that situation

If you weren't actually attorney or a member of the board. what would you say about this?What would you say if I were to tell you that those documents show that the respondent made a lump sum early payoff of. the vehicle *. een $* on August * which is the same time I was asking the court to order the respondent to cover college expenses. for the children. but the respondent was not over ordered to cover tuition, books, clothing, transportation or anything else for the children because the judge believed the respondent can't afford it. So the children were forced to get student loans. The respondent was not ordered to contribute or cover away. tuition, any other. expenses. for attending college clothes. clothing, transportation, sports. Nothing.

No, I just want to know if you weren't actually attorney. What would your response be to that? Or if you are a member of the complaint board, what would your response be?

So, in my complaint I. Will be included? the opposing parties pretrial memorandum? The court's rulings Everything I filed including attachments. and what the opposing party file. and assigned court order.

So I will be organizing them like this. The posing parties. pretrial memorandum. The court ruling. My plan is to. make each motion. that was filed attaching. attaching, for example, my motion my attachments. The opposing parties. Motion and assigned court order showing the judge's ruling. from oldest to newest

So I will be including. the pretrial memorandum, the ruling on that, meaning ongoing child support. my reconsideration motion My college education. motion and all the opposing parties. replies to my motions and the signed court orders by the judge.

All these documents directly prove that All rulings. were based on false statements by the opposing party. without a single document presented proves the judge never looked at the court file proves this judge does not look at documented evidence whether attached to motions or hand delivered to her court

Can you tell me exactly what you mean by high value case?

I also want to know. is a child support judge supposed to be intimidating? a soft representing petitioner?

So if the board will. be filing the complaint fees. All this because the evidence is overwhelming. What do you think will be the outcome?

What kind of disciplinary actions?

What would you say about this?*. I have a right under Illinois law to subpoena relevant third-party records when they are directly connected to determining accurate child support, and especially when overwhelming evidence of concealment exists. *. The Court’s actions—quashing subpoenas for critical records, refusing to acknowledge evidence, issuing orders based on false statements, and punishing me—constitute abuse of discretion and intimidation of a self-represented litigant. *. The contempt order appears retaliatory and designed to suppress my lawful attempt to secure fair and lawful child support for my children.