Repetitive Legal Statements Detected

Can you read the text from the opposing Parties motions. That are being filed in an ongoing child support case. In Chicago, IL District *. After reading the seven sets Of. The opposing parties. texts Can you? Notice the. Statements are the same In all seven sets. Somehow have. One through * Some have one through *. Some have one through *. And some have one through *. Can you also notice? That. They are all. The same statements only. Worded differently. Also, none of the State ments. Are revelant To any. Thing stated in. The petitioners motions

*. That Petitioner, LULA KOROTKOV (hereinafter "LULA"), and NASER were never married, but shared three (*) children together, namely: A.K., and J.K., both born in September *, and S.K., born in October *. *. That the parties were living together from their children's birth until their separation in *. *. On May *, *, Petitioner, LULA KOROTKOV (hereinafter referred to as "LULA") filed her Complaint for Support through the Healthcare and Family Services ("HFS"). *. On October *, *, NASER filed his Appearance. *. On November *, *, HFS filed a Motion for an Order of Support. *. On February *, *, HFS through the Cook County State's Attorney's Office ("State") was granted additional time to "review financials and make recommendation for child support/medical/retroactive support." See February *, * Order incm-porated herein by reference only. *. On March *, *, this matter was set for hearing on HFS' Complaint for Support, and LULA requested a continuance to obtain her own counsel. See March *, * Order mcotporated herein by reference only. *. On May *, *, LULA's first counsel filed his appearance on LULA's behalf after being granted leave to do so. On the same day, the HFS' Complaint for Support was withdrawn and this matter is taken off call as to State issues. See May *, * Order incorporated herein by reference only. *. During the May *, * court date, it appears that the parties agreed to set temporary support at $*.* per month. NASER has been making said payments since then. *. On June *, *, LULA through her first counsel filed a Motion for Temporary Support. Parties were then required to exchange updated financial affidavits with supporting documentation. *. LULA's first counsel filed his Motion to Withdraw on October *, *. *. On October *, *, the Motion to Withdraw was granted and LULA was ordered to file an appearance within 21 days. LULA did not file an appearance within 21 days and on November *, *, this matter was again taken off call and the pleading is stricken with leave to reinstate. *. On December *, *, LULA's second counsel filed a Motion for Temporary Support. *. On March *, *, LULA's counsel served NASER his request to produce documents. *. On April *, *, both parties were ordered to exchange financial affidavits and NASER was ordered to produce the documents LULA's counsel requested. To date, LULA has not updated her financial affidavit. *. On June *, *, NASER sent LULA's counsel his updated financial affidavit, bank statements, * W2, and documents from IRS. *. On July *, *, LULA filed her Petition for Issuance of Rule to Show Cause alleging that NASER failed to comply with LULA's discovery request. *. On July *, *, undersigned counsel filed an Appearance on behalf of NASER. *. On November *, *, this Court conducted a pretrial conference whereby per the parties' agreement, an Order for Support was entered setting permanent child suppolt for the parties' three minor children at the rate of $*,*.* per month to be paid bi-weekly consistent with NASER's pay schedule, begmning December *, *. During said pretrial, LULA was present in the courtroom, and should have had sufficient time to confer with her then counsel. *. On December * *, *, LULA's previous second counsel, Gene Hook, Jr., filed his Motion to Withdraw which was granted on December *, *. *. On December *, *, LULA filed her Motion to Reconsider, alleging that NASER's Pretrial Memo "mimicked a smear campaign as it was filled with intentional false claims, statements, accusations . . ." See LULA's Motion to Reconsider incorporated herein by reference only.

*. andNASERwere never married, but shared three (*) children together, namely: A.K., and J.K., both born in September *, and S.K., born in October *. *. That the parties were living together from their children's birth until their separation in *. *. On May *, *, Petitioner, LULA KOROTKOV (hereinafter referred to as "LULA") filed her Complaint for Support through the Healthcare and Family Services ("HFS"). *. On October *, *, NASER filed his Appearance. *. On November *, *, HFS filed a Motion for an Order of Support. Thereafter, on February *, *, *--1FS through the Cook County State's Attorney's Offce ("State") was granted additional time to "review financials and make recommendation for child support/medical/refroactive support." See February *, * Order incorporated herein by reference only. *. On March *, *, this matter was set for hearing on IffS' Complaint for Support, and LULA requested a continuance to obtain her own counsel. See March *, * Order incorporated herein by reference only. *. On May *, *, LULA's first counsel filed his appearance on LULA's behalf after being granted leave to do so. On the same day, the HFS' Complaint for Support was withdrawn and this matter is taken off call as to State issues. See May *, * Order incorporated herein by reference only. *. During the May *, * court date, it appears that the parties agreed to set temporary support at $*.* per month. NASER has been making said payments since then. *. On June *, *, LULA through her first counsel filed a Motion for Temporary Support. Parties were then required to exchange updated financial affidavits with supporting documentation. *. LULA's first counsel filed his Motion to Withdraw on October *, *. *. On October *, *, the Motion to Withdraw was granted and LULA was ordered to file an appearance within 21 days. LULA did not file an appearance within 21 days and on November *, *, this matter was again taken off call and the pleading is sfricken with leave to reinstate. *. On December *, *, LULA's second counsel filed a Motion for Temporary Support. *. The discovery process continued between parties. *. On July *, *, undersigned counsel filed an Appearance on behalf of NASER. *. On November *, *, this Court conducted a pretrial conference whereby per the parties' agreement, an Order for Support was entered setting permanent child support for the parties' three minor children at the rate of $*,*.* per month to be paid bi-weeldy consistent with NASER's pay schedule, beginning December *, *. During said prefrial, LULA was present in the courtroom, and should have had sufficient time to confer with her then counsel. *. On December *, *, LULA's previous second counsel, Gene Hook, Jr., filed his Motion to Withdraw which was on December *, *. LULA has since filed her pro se Appearance. *. Between January *, * to February *, *, LULA filed the following:

*. That Petitioner, LULA KOROTKOV (hereinafter "LULA"), and NASER were never married, but shared three (*) children together, namely: A.K., and J.K., both born in September *, and S.K., born in October *. *. That the parties were living together from their children's birth until their separation in *. *. On May *, *, Petitioner, LULA KOROTKOV (hereinafter referred to as "LULA") filed her Complaint for Support through the Healthcare and Family Services ("IffS"). *. On October *, *, NASER filed his Appearance. *. On December *, *, LULA's previous second counsel, Gene Hook, Jr., filed his Motion to Withdraw which was granted on December *, *. LULA has since filed her pro se Appearance. *. Between December *, * to February *, *, LULA filed the following:

*. That Petitioner, LULA KOROTKOV (hereinafter “LULA”), and NASER were never married, but shared three (*) children together, namely: A.K., and J.K., both born in September *, and S.K., born in October *. *. That the parties were living together from their children’s birth until their separation in *. *. On May *, *, Petitioner, LULA KOROTKOV (hereinafter referred to as “LULA”) filed her Complaint for Support through the Healthcare and Family Services (“HFS”). *. On October *, *, NASER filed his Appearance. *. On November *, *, HFS filed a Motion for an Order of Support. *. On February *, *, HFS through the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office (“State”) was granted additional time to “review financials and make recommendation for child support/medical/retroactive support.” See February *, * Order incorporated herein by reference only. *. On March *, *, this matter was set for hearing on HFS’ Complaint for Support, and LULA requested a continuance to obtain her own counsel. See March *, * Order incorporated herein by reference only. *. Between March *, * and the date of filing of this Motion, LULA has asked her two previous attorneys to withdraw. Specifically, counting the Assistant State Attorney, LULA has had three attorneys helping her in the instant matter, with her last counsel withdrawing on December *, *, shortly after this Court conducted a Pretrial.

*. That Petitioner, LULA KOROTKOV (hereinafter “LULA”), and NASER were never married, but shared three (*) children together, namely: A.K., and J.K., both born in September *, and S.K., born in October *. *. That the parties were living together from their children’s birth until their separation in *. *. On May *, *, Petitioner, LULA KOROTKOV (hereinafter referred to as “LULA”) filed her Complaint for Support through the Healthcare and Family Services (“HFS”). *. On October *, *, NASER filed his Appearance. *. On November *, *, HFS filed a Motion for an Order of Support. *. On February *, *, HFS through the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office (“State”) was granted additional time to “review financials and make recommendation for child support/medical/retroactive support.” See February *, * Order incorporated herein by reference only. *. On March *, *, this matter was set for hearing on HFS’ Complaint for Support, and LULA requested a continuance to obtain her own counsel. See March *, * Order incorporated herein by reference only. *. Between March *, * and the date of filing of this Motion, LULA has asked her two previous attorneys to withdraw. Specifically, counting the Assistant State Attorney, LULA has had three attorneys helping her in the instant matter, with her last counsel withdrawing on December *, *, shortly after this Court conducted a Pretrial.

*. That Petitioner, LULA KOROTKOV (hereinafter “LULA”), and NASER were never married, but shared three (*) children together, namely: A.K., and J.K., both born in September *, and S.K., born in October *. *. That the parties were living together from their children’s birth until their separation in *. *. On May *, *, Petitioner, LULA KOROTKOV (hereinafter referred to as “LULA”) filed her Complaint for Support through the Healthcare and Family Services (“HFS”). *. On October *, *, NASER filed his Appearance. *. On November *, *, HFS filed a Motion for an Order of Support. *. On February *, *, HFS through the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office (“State”) was granted additional time to “review financials and make recommendation for child support/medical/retroactive support.” See February *, *, Order incorporated herein by reference only. *. On March *, *, this matter was set for hearing on HFS’ Complaint for Support, and LULA requested a continuance to obtain her own counsel. See March *, *, Order incorporated herein by reference only. *. On May *, *, LULA’s first counsel filed his appearance on LULA’s behalf after being granted leave to do so. On the same day, the HFS’ Complaint for Support was withdrawn and this matter is taken off call as to State issues. See May *, *, Order incorporated herein by reference only. *. During the May *, *, court date, it appears that the parties agreed to set temporary support at $*.* per month. NASER has been making said payments since then. *. On June *, *, LULA through her first counsel filed a Motion for Temporary Support. Parties were then required to exchange updated financial affidavits with supporting documentation. *. LULA’s first counsel filed his Motion to Withdraw on October *, *. *. On October *, *, the Motion to Withdraw was granted and LULA was ordered to file an appearance within 21 days. LULA did not file an appearance within 21 days and on November *, *, this matter was again taken off call and the pleading is stricken with leave to reinstate. *. On December *, *, LULA’s second counsel filed a Motion for Temporary Support. *. On March *, *, LULA’s counsel served NASER his request to produce documents. *. On April *, *, both parties were ordered to exchange financial affidavits and NASER was ordered to produce the documents LULA’s counsel requested. To date, LULA has not updated her financial affidavit. *. On June *, *, NASER sent LULA’s counsel his updated financial affidavit, bank statements, * W2, and documents from IRS. *. On July *, *, LULA filed her Petition for Issuance of Rule to Show Cause alleging that NASER failed to comply with LULA’s discovery request. *. On July *, *, undersigned counsel filed an Appearance on behalf of NASER. *. On November *, *, this Court conducted a pretrial conference whereby per the parties’ agreement, an Order for Support was entered setting permanent child support for the parties’ three minor children at the rate of $*,*.* per month to be paid bi-weekly consistent with NASER’s pay schedule, beginning December *, *. During said pretrial, LULA was present in the courtroom, and should have had sufficient time to confer with her then counsel. *. On December *, *, LULA’s previous second counsel, Gene Hook, Jr., filed his Motion to Withdraw which was granted on December *, *.

*. That Petitioner, LULA KOROTKOV (hereinafter “LULA”), and NASER were never married, but shared three (*) children together, namely: A.K., and J.K., both born in September *, and S.K., born in October *. *. That the parties were living together from their children’s birth until their separation in *. *. On May *, *, Petitioner, LULA KOROTKOV (hereinafter referred to as “LULA”) filed her Complaint for Support through the Healthcare and Family Services (“HFS”). *. On October *, *, NASER filed his Appearance. *. On November *, *, HFS filed a Motion for an Order of Support. *. On February *, *, HFS through the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office (“State”) was granted additional time to “review financials and make recommendation for child support/medical/retroactive support.” See February *, *, Order incorporated herein by reference only. *. On March *, *, this matter was set for hearing on HFS’ Complaint for Support, and LULA requested a continuance to obtain her own counsel. See March *, *, Order incorporated herein by reference only. *. On November *, *, this Court conducted a pretrial conference whereby per the parties’ agreement, an Order for Support was entered setting permanent child support for the parties’ three minor children at the rate of $*,*.* per month to be paid bi-weekly consistent with NASER’s pay schedule, beginning December *, *. During said pretrial, LULA was present in the courtroom, and should have had sufficient time to confer with her then counsel. *. Between March *, * and the date of filing of this Motion, LULA has asked her two previous attorneys to withdraw. Specifically, counting the Assistant State Attorney, LULA has had three attorneys helping her in the instant matter, with her last counsel withdrawing on December *, *, shortly after this Court conducted a Pretrial.

My question is, were you able to detect? That all of the statements. Throughout the seven sets. Are the same. Only worded differently.