Summary
In Ohio, a Civil Protection Order (CPO) may be violated if the respondent causes or encourages third-party contact. If the father of your child gave your number to his cousin and encouraged him to contact you, it could be considered a violation. Even if the cousin claims he got your number elsewhere, any indication of encouragement from the father may still constitute a violation. Offering money for a picture of your daughter could further support the case. Review your CPO terms and consider consulting a local attorney for personalized advice.Full Conversation
Today is my daughters birthday, and I have a CPO against her father for both me and her. Her father’s cousin texted my phone number and also called me when he texted me he said that he wanted to tell her happy birthday and then said that he has a couple hundreds in money for her if I send him a picture of her. Basically bribing me with money to send him a picture of her. I do not know him well enough, and he has never had my number so the only person he could’ve gotten it from is her father. Is this a violation of my civil protection order?
In Ohio, a Civil Protection Order (CPO) may include provisions that prohibit third parties from contacting the protected person if the contact is initiated by the respondent. Here are some points to consider:
- If the CPO specifies that third-party contact is prohibited, this could be a violation.
- If her father instructed his cousin to contact you, it might be considered indirect contact.
Have you reviewed the specific terms of your CPO?
Yes should I give you the information stated on my CPO
You don't need to provide the exact details from your CPO here. However, it would be helpful to know if your CPO specifically includes any terms about third-party contact or indirect communication. Can you check your CPO for such terms and let me know?
my CPO states respondent shall not cause or encourage any person to do any act prohibited by the order as well as respondent, shall not initiate or have any contact with the person protected and named in this order or the residences and businesses, places of employment, schools, daycare centers, or childcare providers contact includes, but is not limited to landline, cordless cellular or digital telephone text instant messaging, fax, email, voicemail delivery service, social media, blogging writings, electronic communications, posting a message or communications by any other means, directly or through another person respondent May not violate this order, even with the permission of the Protected person
Case Rating: *
Based on the information provided, it seems like there is a potential violation of your Civil Protection Order (CPO). The order specifies that the respondent should not cause or encourage any person to contact you. If her father gave your number to his cousin and encouraged him to contact you, this could be considered a violation.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
If yes, can you give me a bit more information about the issue?
Would it still be considered a violation if he says that he got my number elsewhere
Case Rating: *
Yes, it could still be considered a violation. Even if the cousin claims he got your number elsewhere, if there's any indication that the father encouraged the contact, it may be a violation of the CPO.
Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, can you give me a bit more information about the issue?
I also wanted to mention that he offered to give me money to send him a picture of my daughter on her birthday
Case Rating: *
It seems like you might have a strong case for a violation of your Civil Protection Order (CPO). Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case?
If yes, could you please provide a bit more information about the issue?