Discrepancies In Financial Declarations

Summary

You can file a response to the motion for sanctions, highlighting discrepancies in the noncustodial parents financial claims. Mention the contradiction between his claim of insufficient income and his ability to pay $8000 in attorney fees. Also, point out the misleading claims about financial assistance from his girlfriend, supported by bank records. Additionally, address the attorneys repetitive and frivolous filings intended to confuse and delay the court. Title your motion as Response and Counter-Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 137: Highlighting Discrepancies in Financial Declarations, Frivolous Filings, Use of Gish Gallop Tactic, Misrepresentation of Financial Assistance, and Concealing Assets. Always consult with a lawyer for precise wording and legal advice.

Full Conversation

I have a question about can I file something bringing attention to it or pointing it out in Chicago Illinois cook county in an ongoing child support case where the respondent noncustodial parent through his attorney has falsely been claiming not to have enough money not to be making enough income for child support and college expenses but then has his attorney file a motion for sanctions under rule * requesting the judge order me to pay his $* back for his attorney fees so if he’s claiming not to have my name how was he able to afford $* for an attorney
Hi Alisa, you can file a response to the motion for sanctions, highlighting the discrepancy in the noncustodial parent's claims about his finances. This will bring the matter to the court's attention. However, I strongly advise seeking legal consultation. This is a complex matter and requires a skilled attorney.
So how would I phrased that meaning highlight it in a way that has both responded and his attorney jaws dropped
You might say, "The respondent's request for $* in attorney fees contradicts his claim of insufficient income. This discrepancy raises questions about the veracity of his financial declarations, which may impact the fairness of child support and college expense determinations." Please consult a lawyer for a more comprehensive response.
Can I also add to that or in the response as the non-custodial parent to his attorney has also been falsely claiming that his girlfriend helps him financially when his bank records contradicts that there’s Zell payments from the girlfriend for $* or $* but I noncustodial parents Zell payments to the girlfriend are over $* how would I explain that in there too also making their jobs dropped
You can add, "Further, the respondent's claim that his girlfriend contributes financially is contradicted by bank records showing him making significant payments to her. This again questions the honesty of his financial disclosure." Always consult a lawyer for precise wording.
OK so if they filed a motion and pursue went for sanctions and pursuant to supreme court rule * when they are aware that I have overwhelming grounded in fact evidence and they do not meaning that they are the ones in direct violation of * how do I point that out in a way to shock them Making the jaws drop while calling them out to the judge
You could say, "Given the clear evidence contradicting the respondent's financial claims, it appears that their motion for sanctions itself might violate Supreme Court Rule *. This further undermines their credibility." Always consult with a lawyer before making such assertions.
And this is both a noncustodial parent and his attorney as I provided her with all documented evidence
You might state, "The respondent and his attorney, despite being provided with compelling evidence contradicting their claims, continue to provide misinformation. This pattern suggests a possible violation of Supreme Court Rule * by both parties." Please consult a legal professional for advice.
I’ve also noticed his attorney in this child support case in Chicago Illinois cook county has been filing all nine of her motions that she has already filed a baseless frivolous misleading intended to confuse and overwhelm the court meaning the judge using a tactic listing The exact same statements that are irreverent to the key points to the case to the arguments being made in my emotions in one motion she’ll have the exact same statements listed one through * and the second one she’ll have one through eight and the third one she’ll have one through * */* one she’ll have one through * and so on gish galloping
You can say, "The attorney's repetitive filings seem to employ a 'gish gallop' tactic to cause confusion. This, along with the misuse of Supreme Court Rule *, indicates a deliberate attempt to mislead the court." Consult with a lawyer to ensure the right approach.
It’s intended to mislead the court confuse the court delay the court harass the petitioner
You might state, "The attorney's actions appear intended to mislead, confuse, and delay the court, as well as harass the petitioner. This could be seen as a breach of their professional obligations." Please consult with a legal professional for further advice.
Can you please give me an example how to title my motion or response as They have filed a motion for sanctions pursuant to rule * falsely claiming that I am filing frivolous motions despite being well aware of the overwhelming documented grounded in fact evidence in my possession where they have not produced a single document for their claims
You could title your response as: "Response to Motion for Sanctions and Counter-Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule *: Evidence of Misleading Financial Declarations and Frivolous Filings". Always consult with a lawyer to ensure the title and content of your filing are appropriate.
I want to point out everything in there including gish galloping
You could title your motion as: "Response and Counter-Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule *: Highlighting Discrepancies in Financial Declarations, Frivolous Filings, and Use of Gish Gallop Tactic". Remember to consult with an attorney for accurate legal advice.
Can I also list in that as the noncustodial parent through his attorney and the frivolous motions have been making false claims that the girlfriend of the non-custodial father is helping him financially as he does not make enough but when you’re looking at his bank records you will see the girlfriend sending him via Zell $* at the most what are you see him sending via Zell to the girlfriend over $* also in his records so girlfriend will send him $* on the same day he will send back the $* plus an extra thousand dollars how would I stick that in there
You could include it as: "Response and Counter-Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule *: Highlighting Discrepancies in Financial Declarations, Frivolous Filings, Use of Gish Gallop Tactic, and Misrepresentation of Financial Assistance." Consult with an attorney for legal advice.
As the noncustodial parents money meaning the two incomes that he receives that are under reported under the table are being hidden under the girlfriends name also purchased a townhouse that is also had an under the girlfriends name and the attorney is aware of this as I provided her evidence
You could say, "Response and Counter-Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule *: Highlighting Discrepancies in Financial Declarations, Frivolous Filings, Use of Gish Gallop Tactic, Misrepresentation of Financial Assistance, and Concealing Assets." Always consult with an attorney.