Judicial Bias In Illinois

Summary

Judicial bias in Cook County child support cases can include favoritism, discrimination, and ignoring evidence. If you believe a judge is biased, you can file a Motion to Substitute Judge for Cause in Illinois. Proving bias requires substantial evidence, such as consistent rulings favoring one party. Consulting a lawyer or legal aid organization can help you navigate this complex process.

Full Conversation

Can you list and explain in detail to what is considered as bias By a Chicago Illinois cook county child support judge
Hello Alisa, bias in a Cook County child support case may include:
*. Preference based on personal relationships.
*. Discrimination due to race, gender, or religion.
*. Basing decisions on personal beliefs rather than law.
*. Prejudice against non-traditional family structures.
Remember, evidence is needed to prove bias.
What else is considered bias by a child support judge
Other examples of bias by a child support judge may include:
*. Ignoring evidence or testimony without reason.
*. Favoritism towards a particular attorney.
*. Inconsistent rulings under similar circumstances.
*. Hostile behavior towards a party.
*. Racial, gender, or socioeconomic discrimination.
So for example if discharge made a ruling based on intentional false information provided to the court through the opposing parties attorney and I as a self representing petitioner filed a motion to reconsider along with overwhelming documented evidence within the 30 day timeframe The judge allowed the opposing parties attorney to strike my hearing date that was set for my motion to reconsider two days prior to the hearing that was set for December *, * on top of that the evidence presented was never looked at The judge also gave The opposing parties attorney A4 month out hearing date for their motion to dismiss my motion to reconsider which is odd because the judge and the attorney from the opposing party are well aware that a motion to dismiss cannot be used against a motion to reconsider this judge also allowed the opposing party to impound records of evidence that were presented with the motion to reconsider and since you listed favoritism towards a particular attorney And rulings made in favor of the opposing party I believe that makes judge bias
It seems you're dealing with a frustrating situation. Based on your description, if the judge ignored your evidence and favored the opposing party's attorney, this could be considered bias. However, proving judicial bias can be complex and may require a legal professional's help. Would you like to get in touch with a legal aid organization in Chicago?
I have all the court rulings that the motion to reconsider along with the motion to hold the opposing party in contempt for miss leading the court and a motion to expedite the proceedings as it is endangering the well-being of the children were all Put to be heard after the opposing parties motion to dismiss I find that concerning for the reasons that the judge should be well aware that a motion to dismiss cannot be used against a motion to reconsider it is not a pleading a judge is supposed to make rulings and decisions based on actual evidence presented and within a timeframe as it is in the best interest of the children’s well-being
It seems you're facing a complex issue. In Illinois, you can file a motion to recuse a judge for bias. Also, consider contacting a local legal aid organization or lawyer for guidance.
So do I file a motion to substitute a judge for cause or do I file a motion to recuse the judge
In Illinois, both terms are used interchangeably. You can file a "Motion to Substitute Judge for Cause" if you believe the judge is biased. Remember, you must provide substantial proof of bias, which can be challenging.
How is it considered impossible if I have all the orders with the judges signature that she ruled and has been ruling in approving baseless motions in the respondents favor not in the children’s favorite
It's not impossible, but challenging. In Illinois, proving judicial bias needs strong evidence. Court orders alone may not be enough. You'd need to show consistent bias that violates judicial ethics. Consulting a lawyer could be beneficial for your case.
I believe all the orders as the orders are clearly evident that all the motions I have filed in the children’s well-being or just placed after the motion to dismiss from the opposing party which is four months out I also believe that a child support judge when presented with documented evidence that the opposing party intentionally lied is supposed to look at the evidence and if a motion is filed that clearly states that the children’s well-being is being endangered and still puts it for months out this is a major issue she is clearly demonstrating that the children’s well-being does not matter
I understand your concern, Alisa. It may indeed indicate bias if the judge consistently favours the opposing party despite your evidence. For next steps, have you considered seeking professional legal assistance to help you navigate this?