Security Camera Legal Concerns

Summary

In Florida, a no contact order prohibits communication or proximity. If a security camera indirectly monitors the protected person, it might violate the order. The cameras original purpose and the girlfriends awareness are crucial factors. Consulting a local attorney is advisable to ensure compliance with the order and avoid indirect communication or monitoring.

Full Conversation

my son has a no contact order against him. His girlfriend is living in the apartment and knows about the camera
In Florida, a no contact order typically restricts any form of communication or indirect contact. If the camera is used to monitor his girlfriend, it could potentially violate the order. It's crucial to check the specifics of the order and consult a local attorney for detailed advice. Is the camera being used in a way that might indirectly communicate or observe his girlfriend?
was originally used to watch his dog while he was at work. The girlfriend moved in later and was told abut the camera
In this situation, if the camera was initially set up for monitoring the dog and the girlfriend was informed about it, it might not directly violate the no contact order. However, it's important to ensure that the camera isn't being used to monitor or communicate with her. Consulting a local attorney could provide more specific guidance. Is there any specific action or concern related to the camera that you need help with?
it is a motion sense camera. only turns on when motion is sensed
Case Rating: *
It seems like the camera's purpose and use are key factors. As it was initially set up for monitoring a pet and the girlfriend was informed, this might not directly violate the order. However, discretion is advised. If motion-sensing could lead to indirect communication or monitoring, consulting an attorney is wise. If you have further concerns or details to share, feel free to ask!
thank you
Case Rating: *
It seems like your son's situation involves some complexity regarding the use of the security camera. While it might not directly violate the no contact order, it's essential to ensure it doesn't lead to any indirect communication or monitoring. Consulting a local attorney would be a wise step to clarify any legal implications. If you have more questions or need further assistance, feel free to ask!
will do. thanks
Case Rating: *
It seems like the situation with the security camera is complex, but it doesn't appear to directly violate the no contact order due to its original purpose. However, consulting a local attorney might help clarify any potential legal implications related to indirect communication or monitoring. If you have more questions or concerns, feel free to reach out!