Retroactive Child Support Confusion

Summary

The case involves confusion over retroactive child support payments, with the judges order focusing on procedural aspects rather than addressing retroactive support. The user should gather all relevant documents, highlight discrepancies in the opposing partys claims, and prepare evidence to support their arguments. Clarifying the distinction between temporary, ongoing, and retroactive child support in court is crucial, especially with the involvement of minor children. Consider seeking legal advice to effectively present the case in court.

Full Conversation

The judge made a ruling on. Going child support. On November *, *, based on the false information without a single document. The rulings were based on the false claims. And opposing parties pretrial memorandum. But I was able to get the judge to agree to a trial, which is coming up in April *. For the reconsideration of the ongoing child support. Payments.
It sounds like there are significant issues with the child support case. Since you have a trial coming up in April, you might want to gather all relevant documents and evidence to present your case effectively.
Do you need any specific legal information on how to prepare for this trial or any other guidance?
Now the judge is stating. What was falsely claimed? In the opposing parties pretrial memorandum. Meaning that the judge made her rulings based on lies. Without any factual documents evidence presented. Hey, Cortana.
It sounds like you are facing a complex situation with your upcoming trial. To help clarify, could you specify what false information was included in the opposing party's pretrial memorandum? This will help determine how best to address it in court.
The judge stated. At the time child support was set, both consoles argued about the date child support was to be calculated from. The court ruled that the Child Support was to be calculated from the date petitioners council filed the motion for child support. But here's the issue. And opposing parties preach our memorandum, they falsely claimed.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're dealing with a complex child support case. Here are some steps you may consider:
- Collect all pertinent documents, including your motion and any prior rulings.
- Identify and highlight any false claims in the opposing party's pretrial memorandum.
- Prepare evidence that supports your claims and counters the false information.
Would you like further details on how to prepare your case for the upcoming trial?
That this case was taken off call due to my failing to file my appearance. And the court was forced to also stop the temporary $* child support. But the clerk was unable to provide any documents to back those claims up. What I did find in the court file that was given to me from by the clerk. Was an error. Court order put in the file by the States attorney who was not involved in this case as I did have a private attorney. But the opposing party, without providing any documented evidence to back up their claims, were able to get this judge to believe that and rule on it. What had happened is I obtained a private attorney. In May of *. Who then withdrew on October in October of *. And I obtained a new attorney within the time frame I was given. So that proves that the judge made her ruling based on false claims. The judge. Clearly did not look at the court files.
Case Rating: *
It seems like your situation could significantly benefit from legal assistance, especially considering the complexities and potential errors involved. Here are some general steps you can take:
- Gather all relevant documents, including motions, orders, and any communication with your attorneys.
- Highlight discrepancies and errors in the opposing party's pretrial memorandum.
- Compile evidence that supports your claims.
Would you like more specific guidance on preparing for your trial?
On March 10th, * I was able to get the State Attorney. To come to court. And get the judge to remove that mistaken order from the court file.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you've made significant progress, but this case still has complexities. Here are some key points to consider:
- Ensure all discrepancies and false claims are well-documented.
- Gather all relevant documents, motions, orders, and communication with your attorneys.
- Prepare evidence that supports your claims and disproves the opposing party's arguments.
Would you like more specific guidance on how to prepare for your trial?
So now I wanna use the judges own drafted court order. As evidence. That she made her rulings based on false information. By the opposing party. If I had a private attorney in May of *. And the respondent was ordered to pay a temporary child support of $*. In June of *. Until November *, *, when the judge made her ongoing ruling for ongoing child support based on all that false information.
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're dealing with a complicated child support case. Here are some steps to consider:
- Collect all relevant documents, including the judge's court order and the opposing party's pretrial memorandum.
- Highlight any false claims and discrepancies.
- Prepare evidence supporting your claims.
Would you like more specific guidance on using the judge's drafted court order as evidence?
Because. If I had a private attorney again. In May of *. That attorney withdraws. In October of * and I hire a new attorney to take the first attorneys position. Why? Would the judge believe? That the Child Support calculation should begin. From when my second attorney filed. For the * dollar temporary support to continue from where the first attorney left off. As the opposing party falsely claimed. In their pretrial memorandum. Without a judge ever even looking at the court file to back up the opposing party's claims because the clerk was unable to provide any documentation to back up the claim that the court was forced to take this case off call and force to stop the temporary child support of $* because I failed. To appear and file my appearance. When in fact the opposing party used the mistaken court order by the State's attorney, who was not involved in this case. To their advantage, which the judge believed.
Case Rating: *
It seems like your situation is highly complex and requires detailed evidence gathering and presentation. Here are some steps you might consider:
- Collect all relevant documents, including motions, orders, and communication with your attorneys.
- Highlight any discrepancies and false claims in the opposing party's pretrial memorandum.
- Compile evidence that supports your claims to present in court.
Would you like further guidance on how to effectively prepare for your trial?
So here is exactly what this judge stated in her own drafted court order dated December *, *. At the time child support was set, both councils argued about the date child support was to be calculated from this court ruled that the Child Support was to be calculated from the date Petitioners Console filed a motion for child support. Which was my second attorney taking over my first attorney. Now how is that fair and how's that possible?
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're dealing with a complex and potentially unfair situation regarding child support calculations. Here are a few points to consider:
- Review Court Orders: Ensure you have a copy of all relevant court orders, including the one from December *, *.
- Document Errors: Clearly document any discrepancies or errors you believe the judge made.
- Prepare Evidence: Gather evidence to support your claims, such as communication with your attorneys and any documentation that disproves the opposing party’s claims.
Would you like more specific guidance on how to prepare your evidence for the trial?
I'm trying to explain to you that the judge made these statements in her own drafted court order after I filed. A motion requesting retroactive. Now she is not mentioning. Retroactive child support or the temporary child support or the ongoing child support. She's only stating at the time child support was set. Both consuls argued about the day child support was to be calculated from this court ruled that the Child Support was to be calculated from the date petitioners council filed for a motion for child support. Counsel for both parties entered an order of support which partitioner now seeks to reargue. From which date child support should be calculated? So I wanna know your official first thoughts of this. Of the judges statements.
Case Rating: *
It seems like the judge's order is based on procedural aspects rather than the merits of the claims. Here are some steps you can take:
- Gather all relevant court orders and documentation.
- Highlight any discrepancies in the judge's order and the opposing party's claims.
- Prepare evidence to support your arguments.
Would you like more specific guidance on how to present these discrepancies and evidence effectively in court?
What I'm asking you is. By the judge making those statements. Is she not attempting to ignore the retroactive? Or is it? See. Does it seem that she does not know the difference? Between the three Temporary child support, Ongoing child support and retroactive child support. Now these this case has *. Minor children involved at the time. Which now my twin sons are 19 years old and my daughter is 16 years old. At the time I filed this case, my children were fourteen and *.
Case Rating: *
It does seem like the judge may be focusing on procedural aspects rather than addressing the retroactive child support. Here are some points to consider:
- The judge's statements could indicate confusion or oversight regarding retroactive child support.
- Clarify in court the distinction between temporary, ongoing, and retroactive child support.
- Ensure you have all relevant documents and evidence to support your claims.
Would you like more specific guidance on how to present this distinction in court?