Separate Order Not Provided

So, in reality, all that information should have actually been in the signed court order. Am I correct? Yes or no?

Can you also tell me why it's not? normal? for a separate order to be entered? without me receiving a copy? What can that be considered as or seen as? legally

I'm asking. what is it considered as or seen as legally in Illinois if it?'s not normal to process or enter a separate order for the contempt and not send the copy? Why is it not in the actual order Why is it separate? Isn't that seen as a attempt to cover something up?

So let me ask you this now. And I need straightforward answers yes or no? And what are the actions considered as. in what it says about the actions legally If a child support judge deliberately. makes a false statement in an order signed December * * and then holds the petitioner in contempt big on that false claim. in the order from December 17th also Keeps the motion to vacate the contempt that was based on false claim. off the court order does not list it on the court order, meaning she kept it off the court file off the record. and then has the petitioner handcuffed and placed in the back chambers from one PM until *:* PM. for the false claim in the order

So now. connect everything I just stated And the fact that that was kept off of the signed court order and receiving an email from the court that it was entered separately and I never received a copy of that. What does that What does that say?

Would you say that it's an attempted cover up of the misconduct?

And is there any Illinois or? laws or Supreme Court rules or child support rules? against a child support judge pulling off these type of actions?

So let's say if I were to provide all this evidence, including the email from the. court stating that that contempt of order was entered separately. And I never received a copy of it. What would the board see it as Would they know that it is not legally normal?

I also want to know what direct answers. is a Chicago, IL child support judge supposed to be making our decisions and rulings based upon verbal statements. without any documented evidence to back up the verbal claims are written claims

So, for example, if I have. actual documented evidence to prove. the respondent is receiving under the table income through Zell and that money is then transferred via cell to his spouse. What type of evidence would you say that is when it's presented to a child support judge? as that straightforward direct evidence?

So now let's say that I provided it. that those documents directly to the judge Now that's the respondents actual big's records showing what I just stated. and the respondent verbally states Underoath that it was a buddy lending him money so that he can pay off some of the money that he owes his attorney that was representing him in this case. of $*,* But. there is a signed court order by this judge dated January 6th. * which clearly states that the respondent owes his previous attorney a total amount of * and he agreed to pay$* by credit card starting January * *. But the judge in her order. states. that the respondents testimony was credible.

Now, if a judge has the respondents. financial affidavit in front of her during the hearing. And in that financial affidavit, it lists all of the respondents monthly expenses. which totals $* also in that financial affidavit It clearly shows tax filing status as Married filing jointly. the judge stated in her signed order. the court notes that he files taxes married separately

I'm asking you what you see wrong with that.

The respondents Bay. statements that I also presented show. that he received a paycheck deposit July * * There was no paycheck deposits. in his bank statements after that. at all. to judge stated in the order she signed that the respondents transferred to his spouse. are consistent with the respondents paycheck. The judge deliberately. stated in the court order, making it look as if the * the respondent received by a zell was consistent with the respondents Paycheck. now would you say that the judge is helping the respondent cover up his higher hidden income? Yes or no?

The judge is also attempting to just. ify her obstruction of discovery. for the reconsideration. in the order I she is attempting to use this as The reason she squashed my subpoena for direct relevant. bank records. by stating the court notes that he files taxes as married filing separately and not jointly with his wife, the court denied petitioners request to subpoena the banking records of the respondents wife where he was not jointly named on the account That's how the judge is attempting to justify her action. when the Illinois Supreme Court rule states clearly That's a third parties bank records can be subpoenaed if they are directly relevant in a case.

The respondent spouses bank records are directly relevant in this child support case for reasons that. the respondents bank records show consistent. zell payments to the spouse Now the judge is trying to make it look in the order as if the cell payments that respond on the receipts. from other third parties. are his paycheck when they are not That is under the table income he receives which he then transfers to the spouse.

I'm asking you what? is it considered if the judge is using that excuse to justify her action?

So let's say that I file a notice of Appeal. Can this judge that has been. handling this case. stop my appeal or get involved or interfere. Yes or no?

I'm asking that question because I know for a fact that once I filed that notice of appeal and provide a copy of the notice to the respondent that he. will email the job. handling this case trying to get her to stop it.

Now this judge has denied. my motion for retroactive child support twice. Both times falsely verbally stated that she had handled retroactive in my case already when the court file and orders clearly contradict our claims. She also attempted to misrepresent my request for retroactive child support as arrears. at the hearing the judge stated that she was going to apply arrears to the date of June * * As she stated, I am not going all the way back to the beginning. but again, I. stated to the judge, Your Honor arrears are not retroactive child support. They cannot. be applied. before a formal child support order was in place. They cannot be applied to temporary child support orders. The judge stated yes, they are retroactive. and she ruled that the respondent would only owe $* in arrears. But that ruling is not in her signed court order. So that means she deliberately left that rolling out meaning the respondent gets to evade from having to pay. that $*.

Can you tell me if the judge is correct? that arrears are retroactive child support. or she's misinterpreting it. deliberately

So what would you say the judge is actually doing by. denying my retroactive motion. request twice. and falsely claiming that it was already handled. and then making this rule that I just stated, but then deliberately leaving it off the order.

So if I file an appeal. and provide all the evidence of what I stated, and also ask the appeal court to enforce retroactive child support without respondent's actual income.

So if I file an appeal. and provide all the evidence of what I stated, and also ask the appeal court to enforce retroactive child support without respondent's actual income.

Can you just tell me yes or no to my question?