Contradictory Financial Disclosures Evidence

Summary

The respondents financial disclosures contain contradictions, suggesting potential income fraud and asset concealment. To list this in your motion to compel, state: The financial disclosures provided to my previous attorney versus his current attorney contain contradictory information, suggesting possible income fraud. Attach relevant documents as evidence. For asset concealment, state: Documented asset concealment under the names of Lisa Calderon and Anthony C. Calderon, with the respondents financial disclosure evidencing this. For large transactions, state: The respondents bank statements reveal large transactions, suggestive of an expensive lifestyle and potential diversion of funds to third parties via Zell and Apple Cash. For impersonation, state: The respondents girlfriend has been impersonating him in emails, causing distress to the children, as evidenced by an attached email regarding DNA testing where she inadvertently revealed herself. For misleading employment information, state: The respondent knowingly listed NCR Corporation as his employer in the pretrial memorandum, despite being aware of his payroll shift to Cardtronics USA. This misinformation delayed child

Full Conversation

I want to state something like the respondent intentionally and knowingly provided NCR corporation as his employer N the pretrial memorandum submitted to the court on November *, * with his attorney submitting a wage withholding notice to NCR corporation headquarters located in Atlanta Georgia with the respondent being fully aware that NCR corporation split into two different entities NCR corporation becoming ncr voyix and ncr atleos with NCR atleos using car Tronics USAA payroll as the respondents bank statement that will be provided at the pre-trial will show the respondent receiving payments from car Tronics USA so he was well aware two months prior to the submission of the pretrial memorandum to the court This proves his disregard for child support obligation in the well-being of the children
For your sixth reason, you might consider saying: "The respondent intentionally provided misleading information about his employment in the pretrial memorandum of November *, *. He was aware of NCR Corporation's split and his subsequent payroll change to Cardtronics USA, as evidenced by his bank statement. This act shows disregard for his child support obligations and negatively affects the children's well-being." Consult a legal professional for precise guidance.
Lawyer.com offers free connections with expert lawyers. Call *-*-* for help.
I need some thing that well be straightforward the respondent knowingly provided NCR corporation as his employer in the pretrial memorandum to which his attorney sent the wage withholding notice to in Atlanta Georgia The respondents bank statements that will be provided at the pre-trial show the respondent being well aware two months prior as he was already on The payroll of car Tronics USA l Headquartered in Houston Texas where the wage withholding notice should have been sent this delayed child support payments and endangered for children’s well-being as a response and was well aware there will be no child support payments coming for the children
For your sixth reason, phrase it as: "The respondent knowingly listed NCR Corporation as his employer in the pretrial memorandum, despite being aware of his payroll shift to Cardtronics USA. This delayed child support payments and endangered the children. His bank statements, to be provided at pre-trial, support this claim." Attach the relevant documents as evidence and consult a legal professional for precise guidance.
Lawyer.com offers free connections with expert lawyers. Call *-*-* for help.
I don’t want to phrase that way I want it phrase more my way
If you'd like to phrase it in your own words, you could say: "The respondent, knowingly and intentionally, submitted incorrect employment information in the pretrial memorandum, causing a delay in child support payments. His bank statements, which will be presented at pre-trial, show he was already employed by Cardtronics USA. This act has put the children's welfare at risk." Remember to consult a legal professional for advice.
Lawyer.com offers free connections with expert lawyers. Call *-*-* for help.
Let’s clarify that again so for example if the respondent through his attorney provided an employers information knowing he will not be on that payroll as the company split into two different entities meaning he was aware ahead of time that he will no longer be on the payroll of NCR corporation located in Atlanta Georgia as his bank statement that will be provided at the pre-trial will show he was already on the payroll of car Tronics USA as of September *, * two months prior to the pretrial memorandum making him well aware that his attorney sent a wage withholding to NCR corporation in Atlanta Georgia which cost a delay in child support payments and endangered the children’s well-being showing his disregard for the children’s well-being
For your sixth reason, you can state: "The respondent, through his attorney, knowingly provided incorrect employer information. He was already on Cardtronics USA's payroll as of September *, *, two months prior to the pretrial memorandum, yet stated he was employed by NCR Corporation. This misinformation delayed child support payments and endangered the children's well-being." Attach the bank statement as evidence. Always consult a legal professional for precise guidance.
Lawyer.com offers free connections with expert lawyers. Call *-*-* for help.
I cannot attach the bank statement I will provide It at the pre-trial but I can attach a page from the memorandum that list his employer as NCR corporation
In that case, state: "The respondent knowingly provided incorrect employer information in the pretrial memorandum. As evidence, I will provide a bank statement at the pretrial showing he was employed by Cardtronics USA from September *, *, contrary to his claim of employment with NCR Corporation. This resulted in delayed child support payments and harm to the children's well-being." Attach the memorandum page as evidence. Consult a legal professional for precise guidance.
Lawyer.com offers free connections with expert lawyers. Call *-*-* for help.
My reason number seven would be for the respondents W-* forms for the years * * and two of them for the year * all list different wages what is the most interesting is for the year * and the two of them for the year of * were all sent by his attorney the * one was sent to Mr. Hawk on August *, * and the other two for the year of * were sent to me on June *, * only nine months in two weeks as they all have different wages listed which is odd and one of those W-* forms is for car Tronics USA inc located in Houston Texas
For your seventh reason, you might say: "The respondent's W-* forms for *, *, and *, all provided by his attorney, show inconsistent wages. This raises questions about his income reporting. Notably, one of the W-* forms is for Cardtronics USA Inc., contradicting his stated employment." Attach the W-* forms as evidence. Consult a legal professional for precise guidance.
Lawyer.com offers free connections with expert lawyers. Call *-*-* for help.
They will be provided at the pre-trial and the * W-* was provided by the respondent to Mr. Renzetti and the other three were provided by his current attorney
For your seventh reason, you could state: "The respondent's W-* forms for the years *, *, and *, which will be provided at the pre-trial, show inconsistent wages. This discrepancy raises concerns about the accuracy of his income reporting." Consult a legal professional for precise guidance.
Lawyer.com offers free connections with expert lawyers. Call *-*-* for help.
You’re not understanding me the respondent provided Mr. Renzetti with his * W-* with his wages being at *,* on August *, * his * W-* was provided to Mr. Hoch with his wages listed as *,* the two W-* forms for * provided nine months and two weeks after his * W-* forms all list different wages which is odd with only nine months and two weeks apart and one of those * W-* forms is for car Tronics USA inc Located in Houston Texas
For your seventh reason, you could state: "The respondent's W-* forms for *, *, and * show inconsistent wages in a short time span. Notably, one of the * forms is from Cardtronics USA Inc., contradicting his stated employment. These documents will be provided at the pre-trial." Always consult a legal professional for precise guidance.
Lawyer.com offers free connections with expert lawyers. Call *-*-* for help.