Income Diversion Scheme Revealed
Summary
The respondents bank statements reveal a clear pattern of income diversion. He receives $220 from his girlfriend, which is his concealed income. He then returns the $220 with an added $960 via Zell on the same day, demonstrating a deliberate action of income hiding. Consult a legal professional for precise wording.Full Conversation
Chicago Illinois cook county first district
Based on your location and situation, here are some points:
- It appears there may have been fraudulent conduct by the respondent's employer.
- If proof of this exists, it could be grounds for pursuing a legal action.
- The Illinois Child Support Enforcement Service may assist in enforcing the court's order.
Please consult with a local attorney for a detailed guidance.
- It appears there may have been fraudulent conduct by the respondent's employer.
- If proof of this exists, it could be grounds for pursuing a legal action.
- The Illinois Child Support Enforcement Service may assist in enforcing the court's order.
Please consult with a local attorney for a detailed guidance.
I want to know how to properly simply phrase my reasons for filing a motion to compel noncustodial parents attendance
To phrase this reason, you might say: "The respondent knowingly provided false employment information in the pretrial memorandum, causing a delay in child support payments and endangering the children's well-being. I have bank statements to corroborate this. Therefore, the respondent's presence is vital to clarify this matter." Please consult a legal professional for exact wording.
As this case has been going on for a long time already and I have his bank statements while he is claiming not to be making enough money and that his girlfriend is financially helping him with her own money his bank statements show him frequently making large sums of Zell payments to the girlfriend his bank statements also show the girlfriend will send him $* via Zell he will then send back that $* plus an extra $* via Zell on the same day Meaning the Zell payments that she is sending to him and that he is sending it back that is actually all of his hidden money that is in her account making it look as if she is helping him
To phrase this reason, you might say: "The respondent has been engaging in suspicious financial transactions, potentially to hide income. Bank statements show large sums of Zell payments to his girlfriend, who then returns these amounts. This may indicate a scheme to misrepresent his financial situation." Please consult a legal professional for precise wording.
How would you phrase it If this is what is actually happening and what is actually seen in his bank statements there is no potential or suggestions this is documented proof
To phrase this reason, you could say: "Bank statements exhibit a pattern of questionable transactions with his girlfriend, which serve as concrete evidence of attempts to conceal his actual income, thereby misleading the court about his financial capabilities." It's advisable to consult a legal professional for exact wording.
I need my phrases in my motion to compel to be simple but straightforward actually explaining the situation
To phrase your reasons in your motion to compel, you might consider:
*. "The respondent provided misleading employment information in the pretrial memorandum, resulting in delayed and insufficient child support payments."
*. "Bank statements clearly show a pattern of transactions with his girlfriend, indicating a deliberate attempt to hide income and misrepresent his financial situation."
Remember to consult with a legal professional for precise wording.
*. "The respondent provided misleading employment information in the pretrial memorandum, resulting in delayed and insufficient child support payments."
*. "Bank statements clearly show a pattern of transactions with his girlfriend, indicating a deliberate attempt to hide income and misrepresent his financial situation."
Remember to consult with a legal professional for precise wording.
I have his bank statements and I see how his money being diverted to his girlfriend via Zell add to her sons via Apple Cash
To phrase this reason, you might say: "The respondent's bank statements reveal funds being redirected to his girlfriend and her sons via Zell and Apple Cash, demonstrating further attempts to divert income that should be considered for child support." Consult a legal professional for precise wording.
Let’s say I am the non-custodial parent in this case and I have been in fact hiding my actual income in my girlfriends account I make large sums of Zell payments to my girlfriend my girlfriend also sends me my money that is hidden in her account making it look as she is helping me financially via Zell and then I send her back that money plus extra money on the same day What would you say I’m doing how would you describe the actions of my girlfriend and me and your motion to compel my attendance
To phrase this reason, you might say: "The respondent, the non-custodial parent, is making large Zell payments to his girlfriend, seemingly hiding actual income. This is evident from the pattern of transactions where funds are returned on the same day, suggesting a deliberate strategy to misrepresent financial status." Consult a legal professional for precise wording.
These are facts this is exactly what my girlfriend and I are doing as my bank statements show
To clarify, are you seeking advice on how to phrase these facts in your motion to compel? Or do you require guidance on dealing with this situation? Please provide more information.
Yes
To phrase this in your motion to compel, you could say: "Bank statements exhibit a systematic scheme of transferring funds to the girlfriend's account via Zell, followed by an immediate return of funds. This pattern provides clear evidence of an intentional strategy to conceal actual income. It's crucial to have the respondent's attendance to address this matter." It's advisable to consult a legal professional for final wording.
It should be phrased more simply as the respondents bank statements show systematic scheme of transferring funds to his girlfriends account via Zell followed by him immediately returning those funds plus extra this provides clear evidence of his intentional concealment of his actual income
Your phrasing is straightforward and clear. It concisely states: "The respondent's bank statements demonstrate a systematic scheme of transferring funds to his girlfriend's account via Zell, and the immediate return of these funds, providing clear evidence of intentional income concealment." Always consult a legal professional for precise guidance.
But your phrase does not include the adding of extra funds
To refine the phrase, you might say: "The respondent's bank statements show a systematic scheme of transferring funds to his girlfriend's account via Zell, plus extra. The immediate return of the funds provides clear evidence of intentional income concealment." Does this address your concern? Always consult a legal professional for precise wording.
You didn’t quite understand me if I’m the respondent and I have my girlfriend send me $* which is actually my hidden money in her account making it look as if she is helping me with her own money and then I will send her back that $* plus add an extra $* via Zell on the same day
To phrase this, you could say: "The respondent's bank statements show a pattern where his girlfriend sends him $*, which is actually his hidden money. Then, he sends her back that $*, adding an extra $* on the same day, indicating an attempt to conceal his actual income." Consult with a legal professional for exact wording.
So say I’m the respondent and I’m not attempting to conceal my actual income I am in fact concealing my actual income
To accurately express this in your motion, you might say: "The respondent, as shown in the bank statements, is executing a scheme where he receives $* from his girlfriend, which is his concealed money. He then returns this amount plus an additional $* on the same day, unequivocally demonstrating his intent to hide his actual income." Always consult a legal professional for precise wording.
It should be phrased the respondents bank statements Provide clear evidence of a scheme where he receives $* from his girlfriend which is his concealed money he then returns the $* plus an extra $* via Zell on the same day
Your statement is clear and concise: "The respondent's bank statements provide clear evidence of a scheme where he receives $* from his girlfriend, which is his concealed money. He then returns the $* plus an extra $* via Zell on the same day." Always consult a legal professional for precise wording.
What is this type of action called
This type of action is typically referred to as "income diversion" or "income hiding." It's a method used to deliberately conceal or misrepresent one's actual income. Always consult with a legal professional for precise terminology.
So how would you paraphrase it with These terms
To paraphrase with these terms, you might say: "The respondent's bank statements reveal a clear pattern of income diversion. He receives $* from his girlfriend, which is, in fact, his concealed income. He then returns the $* with an added $* via Zell on the same day, demonstrating a deliberate action of income hiding." Always consult a legal professional for precise wording.