Summary
A declaration for family court in California should include your full name, relationship to the case, factual statements, personal observations, and any supporting documents. It must be signed under penalty of perjury. When filing a set aside motion for perjury in a DVRO, include evidence of perjury, its impact, and a signed declaration. The MC-031 form is used for declarations and may appear on the court docket. Reasons to set aside a DVRO include lack of jurisdiction, fraud, mistake, injustice, or new evidence. Injustice refers to unfair or improper procedures or excessively harsh decisions. Consult an attorney for personalized advice.Full Conversation
California
In California, a declaration for family court should include:
- Your full name and relationship to the case
- Factual statements relevant to the case
- Your personal observations
- Any supporting documents
- Signed under penalty of perjury
Remember, this information is only applicable to California.
What should be included when filing a set aside motion for Perjury in the issuance of a dvro
When filing a set aside motion for perjury in California, you should include:
- Evidence of the perjury
- Impact of the perjury on the DVRO
- Your full name and case details
- A declaration signed under penalty of perjury.
Please consult a lawyer for personalized advice.
Would the mc * be shown on a court docket as a declaration
In California, the MC-* is a form used for declarations and could be listed on a court docket. However, how it's listed can vary based on the court's practices. Please confirm with the court clerk or your attorney.
What are the reasons for setting aside a dvro
In California, a Domestic Violence Restraining Order (DVRO) may be set aside due to:
- Lack of jurisdiction
- Fraud
- Mistake
- Injustice
- New evidence of a material fact
Consult with an attorney for personalized advice.
What is the injustice thing
Injustice in a legal context refers to a violation of the rights of another party. In terms of setting aside a DVRO in California, it could mean that the order was granted based on unfair or improper procedures, or the decision was excessively harsh or unfair.