Free To End Users
Summary
MPEG LAs free to end users means consumers dont pay licensing fees for H.264 videos. Platforms like YouTube cover these fees for monetized content. Outside YouTube, creators may need a license to monetize H.264 videos. Always check platform-specific terms.Full Conversation
I live in United States. What does “free to end users mean” by MPEG LA?
Hello ****, "Free to end users" by MPEG LA means that end users (consumers who use the final product) are not required to pay any licensing fees. The licensing cost is typically borne by the manufacturers or service providers.
What else?
In addition to being free for end users, MPEG LA's licensing model also:
- Allows manufacturers to include patented technologies in their products without individual negotiations.
- Ensures legal use of patented technologies.
- Reduces risk of patent infringement.
Your location doesn't impact this as it's a global agreement.
- Allows manufacturers to include patented technologies in their products without individual negotiations.
- Ensures legal use of patented technologies.
- Reduces risk of patent infringement.
Your location doesn't impact this as it's a global agreement.
I mean for internet videos
For internet videos, the "free to end users" concept by MPEG LA also applies. It means that as a viewer, you are not required to pay any licensing fees to watch videos online. The licensing fees are usually covered by the platform hosting the video or the content creator.
Wait what if the creator monetizes them online but the videos are free to the viewers?
If the creator monetizes the videos online but they are free for the viewers, the creator is typically responsible for any necessary licensing fees. This is due to the income generated from the monetization. However, the specifics may vary depending on the platform and the terms of the licensing agreement.
Is licensing required if a h.* video is monetized but free to watch like on YouTube for example
In the United States, the use of H.*/AVC Patent Portfolio License by MPEG LA is generally required for monetized videos, but not for videos free to end users. However, YouTube has an agreement covering this, so individual creators don't typically need to get a separate license. It's always best to review the terms of your specific platform.
Explain more
In essence, YouTube has a license agreement with MPEG LA, which covers H.* video. So, if you're a content creator on YouTube, you don't need to get a separate license, even if you're monetizing your videos. The licensing fees are handled by YouTube, and viewers can watch for free.
How does YouTube pay for all that? That’s crazy
YouTube covers the cost of licensing fees through its various revenue streams, which primarily include advertising revenue and premium subscription fees. This model allows YouTube to provide a free viewing experience to the majority of its users.
What about outside of YouTube regarding MPEG LA?
If a content creator chooses to monetize videos outside of YouTube, they may need to obtain a license from MPEG LA. This depends on the specific platform they are using. For example, Vimeo has a similar agreement with MPEG LA, while other platforms may not. It's essential to review the terms of each platform.
What if the video is still free to the viewers while monetized?
If a video is monetized but still free for viewers, typically, the platform or content creator is responsible for licensing fees. This is the case regardless of the platform, as long as it uses MPEG LA's patented technologies. Always check each platform's specific terms.
Oops I meant h.*
If you're referring to H.* videos, the same principles apply. The creator or the platform usually covers the licensing costs. This includes videos that are monetized but free for viewers. Can you clarify if you're considering using a specific platform for your videos?
Wait a minute it sounds like you’re giving me mixed answers, you said there is no license with YouTube but now you’re saying outside of YouTube even if its free it requires a license what?!!
I apologize if my responses were confusing. To clarify:
- On YouTube, you don't need a separate license for H.* videos, even if monetized. YouTube has a blanket license covering its creators.
- Outside of YouTube, if a platform doesn't have a similar blanket license, individual creators may need to obtain a license to monetize H.* videos, even if they're free for viewers.
- On YouTube, you don't need a separate license for H.* videos, even if monetized. YouTube has a blanket license covering its creators.
- Outside of YouTube, if a platform doesn't have a similar blanket license, individual creators may need to obtain a license to monetize H.* videos, even if they're free for viewers.
Did MPEG LA say this or are you making this up
This information is based on the most recent understanding of MPEG LA's licensing policies. However, for the most accurate information, it's best to directly refer to MPEG LA's official guidelines or consult with a legal expert.