TRY ME!
Judicial Misconduct And Bias
Summary
Judicial misconduct involves actions that undermine the integrity of the judicial process, such as fabricating evidence or bias against pro se litigants. If you suspect misconduct, consider filing a complaint with the Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit or drafting a motion for fraud upon the court. Citing the reasonable person doctrine and historical bias in pro se cases can strengthen your argument. Gathering statistical evidence, expert testimony, and personal narratives can also support your case. If needed, consult a lawyer for guidance on navigating these complex issues.Full Conversation
in my case the misconduct is that the * judge panel lyied about my documented evidence, then, fabricated rationale for dismissal and, finally, dismissed my case based on their lies. they also ignoring or never responding to several of my filings of Motions
It sounds like you're facing a challenging situation with the court. If you believe there's been judicial misconduct, you might consider filing a complaint with the state's judicial conduct commission.
- In Arizona, you can report judicial misconduct to the Commission on Judicial Conduct.
- You might also explore appealing the decision if the timeframe has not expired.
Would you like more information on how to proceed with these options, or do you have any other questions?
- In Arizona, you can report judicial misconduct to the Commission on Judicial Conduct.
- You might also explore appealing the decision if the timeframe has not expired.
Would you like more information on how to proceed with these options, or do you have any other questions?
i keep forgetting.....this is 9th Circuit Appeals Court
Case Rating: *
It seems you're dealing with serious issues regarding judicial misconduct. Since this involves the 9th Circuit Appeals Court, you might consider the following options:
- File a complaint with the Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit.
- Consult with a lawyer for guidance on appealing or addressing misconduct.
Would you like more information on these options?
It seems you're dealing with serious issues regarding judicial misconduct. Since this involves the 9th Circuit Appeals Court, you might consider the following options:
- File a complaint with the Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit.
- Consult with a lawyer for guidance on appealing or addressing misconduct.
Would you like more information on these options?
let' try it again 9th Circuit...in my case the misconduct is that the * judge panel lyied about my documented evidence, then, fabricated rationale for dismissal and, finally, dismissed my case based on their lies. they also ignoring or never responding to several of my filings of Motions
Case Rating: *
This seems like a significant issue that might require professional legal assistance. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, could you provide a bit more information about the issue?
This seems like a significant issue that might require professional legal assistance. Would you like to be connected to local lawyers who can better assist you with your case? If so, could you provide a bit more information about the issue?
not yet
Case Rating: *
Your situation with the 9th Circuit Appeals Court sounds quite serious, involving potential judicial misconduct. If you change your mind about connecting with local lawyers, feel free to reach out. Meanwhile, you might consider filing a complaint with the Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit. If you have further questions or need guidance, I'm here to help!
Your situation with the 9th Circuit Appeals Court sounds quite serious, involving potential judicial misconduct. If you change your mind about connecting with local lawyers, feel free to reach out. Meanwhile, you might consider filing a complaint with the Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit. If you have further questions or need guidance, I'm here to help!
Complaint for Judicial Conduct is not serious enough nd there are no laws to enforce this type of Complaint. I drafting a Motion for Fraud Upon the Court
Case Rating: *
Drafting a Motion for Fraud Upon the Court is a serious step, especially if you believe the judges acted improperly. Here are some points to consider:
- Fraud upon the court involves actions that corrupt the judicial process.
- It requires evidence of intentional deception or misconduct.
- Consulting a lawyer might be beneficial to navigate this complex issue.
If you have questions about drafting the motion, feel free to ask!
Drafting a Motion for Fraud Upon the Court is a serious step, especially if you believe the judges acted improperly. Here are some points to consider:
- Fraud upon the court involves actions that corrupt the judicial process.
- It requires evidence of intentional deception or misconduct.
- Consulting a lawyer might be beneficial to navigate this complex issue.
If you have questions about drafting the motion, feel free to ask!
One last question, at this time. It's this statement: "- Fraud upon the court involves actions that corrupt the judicial process." This statement to me allows too much WIGGLE room for the Court to argue against my claims that the * judge panel CORRUPTED the judicial process
Case Rating: *
The statement "Fraud upon the court involves actions that corrupt the judicial process" is broad to encompass various forms of misconduct. Courts typically require clear evidence of intentional deception or actions that severely undermine the judicial process. The challenge is in demonstrating this with substantial evidence. Would you like more guidance on presenting evidence or drafting your motion?
The statement "Fraud upon the court involves actions that corrupt the judicial process" is broad to encompass various forms of misconduct. Courts typically require clear evidence of intentional deception or actions that severely undermine the judicial process. The challenge is in demonstrating this with substantial evidence. Would you like more guidance on presenting evidence or drafting your motion?
I think, first, I have to present a definition of Judicial Process. Then, explain exactly HOW and WHY my claims of Fraud Upon the Court meet that definition. Futher, I need to cite Case Law
Case Rating: *
To address your claims of Fraud Upon the Court, consider the following steps:
- Definition of Judicial Process: Judicial process refers to the series of steps by which legal judgments are administered, including hearings, trials, and appeals.
- Fraud Upon the Court: This is misconduct that undermines the integrity of the judicial proceedings, requiring clear evidence of intentional deception.
- Case Law: Cite relevant cases like Herring v. United States, focusing on how egregious misconduct was defined and proven.
Would you like more information on specific cases or advice on how to draft your motion effectively?
To address your claims of Fraud Upon the Court, consider the following steps:
- Definition of Judicial Process: Judicial process refers to the series of steps by which legal judgments are administered, including hearings, trials, and appeals.
- Fraud Upon the Court: This is misconduct that undermines the integrity of the judicial proceedings, requiring clear evidence of intentional deception.
- Case Law: Cite relevant cases like Herring v. United States, focusing on how egregious misconduct was defined and proven.
Would you like more information on specific cases or advice on how to draft your motion effectively?
Specific cases and drafting the Motion would be great !
Case Rating: *
Here are some relevant cases you might consider:
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.: Recognized fraud upon the court as a reason to overturn prior judgments.
- United States v. Throckmorton: Established criteria for fraud upon the court.
For drafting your motion:
- Structure: Define the judicial process and detail how the judges' actions fit this definition.
- Evidence: Present clear, documented evidence of misconduct.
- Case Law: Cite relevant cases to support your claims.
If you need further guidance, feel free to ask!
Here are some relevant cases you might consider:
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.: Recognized fraud upon the court as a reason to overturn prior judgments.
- United States v. Throckmorton: Established criteria for fraud upon the court.
For drafting your motion:
- Structure: Define the judicial process and detail how the judges' actions fit this definition.
- Evidence: Present clear, documented evidence of misconduct.
- Case Law: Cite relevant cases to support your claims.
If you need further guidance, feel free to ask!
OK... let me do research on that and get back to you ! Thanks,
Case Rating: *
It seems like you have a complex and serious issue on your hands. If you need more guidance or decide to seek professional legal assistance, I'm here to help. Feel free to reach out whenever you need more information or support in your legal journey. Good luck with your research!
It seems like you have a complex and serious issue on your hands. If you need more guidance or decide to seek professional legal assistance, I'm here to help. Feel free to reach out whenever you need more information or support in your legal journey. Good luck with your research!
I will, definitely ! Thx
Case Rating: *
I understand you're dealing with a challenging legal situation. If you need further assistance or decide to connect with local lawyers for more personalized help, feel free to reach out. Good luck with your research and drafting efforts!
I understand you're dealing with a challenging legal situation. If you need further assistance or decide to connect with local lawyers for more personalized help, feel free to reach out. Good luck with your research and drafting efforts!
dlc
Case Rating: *
Your situation involves serious allegations of judicial misconduct, which can be quite complex. You've taken a thoughtful approach by researching case law and crafting a motion. If you need further guidance or support, feel free to reach out anytime. Good luck with your efforts!
Your situation involves serious allegations of judicial misconduct, which can be quite complex. You've taken a thoughtful approach by researching case law and crafting a motion. If you need further guidance or support, feel free to reach out anytime. Good luck with your efforts!
9th Circuit next questions ! Would define "a substantive motion" in this sentence. "A procedural motion filed during the pendency of a substantive motion shall be referred to the court unit that is handling the substantive motion."
Case Rating: *
A "substantive motion" refers to a motion that addresses the core issues of a case, affecting the rights of the parties involved. It contrasts with procedural motions, which deal with the methods or processes of handling the case rather than the substance of the dispute. Let me know if you have more questions!
A "substantive motion" refers to a motion that addresses the core issues of a case, affecting the rights of the parties involved. It contrasts with procedural motions, which deal with the methods or processes of handling the case rather than the substance of the dispute. Let me know if you have more questions!
hmmmm ....... gotta think about this..... YUP ! mine was a Procedural motion BUT, would a procedural Motion be considered as ".....asking leave of the Court?"
Case Rating: *
A procedural motion generally deals with the management or administration of a case rather than its substance. "Asking leave of the Court" typically refers to seeking the court's permission for a specific action. A procedural motion might request leave for actions like extending deadlines or amending filings. If you need more details, let me know!
A procedural motion generally deals with the management or administration of a case rather than its substance. "Asking leave of the Court" typically refers to seeking the court's permission for a specific action. A procedural motion might request leave for actions like extending deadlines or amending filings. If you need more details, let me know!
my procedural Motion was to ask the Court for permission to make Clerical Changes to conform my Motion with formatting requirements such as a Table of Contents and facilitating documentation navigation
Case Rating: *
Your procedural motion seems to fit the concept of "asking leave of the Court" as you are seeking permission to make clerical changes for better compliance with formatting requirements. If you have more questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask!
Your procedural motion seems to fit the concept of "asking leave of the Court" as you are seeking permission to make clerical changes for better compliance with formatting requirements. If you have more questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask!
THANK YOU ! this helps me argue my case against Appellee who claimed that he was stricking my Motion cos I hadn't asked for "leave of the Court." Hmmmm I assume therefore the Appellee read my Motion to make his decision. FURTHER, given Appellee read my Motion, he also knew I only made clerical changes which he later lied about.
Case Rating: *
It seems like you're dealing with a complex situation involving procedural motions and alleged misconduct by the Appellee. If you believe there's been a misrepresentation of your actions and intentions, providing clear evidence and documentation of your motion's purpose and content may strengthen your argument. If you need further assistance or have more questions, feel free to ask!
It seems like you're dealing with a complex situation involving procedural motions and alleged misconduct by the Appellee. If you believe there's been a misrepresentation of your actions and intentions, providing clear evidence and documentation of your motion's purpose and content may strengthen your argument. If you need further assistance or have more questions, feel free to ask!
Yes, I absolutely have documented evidence. I'm wondering, under what circumstances would a Court consider the "reasonable person doctrine" to be substantive ?
Case Rating: *
The "reasonable person doctrine" is considered substantive when assessing negligence or liability. It evaluates whether actions meet the standard of what a reasonable person would do in similar circumstances. This doctrine can be applied in cases involving personal injury, contract disputes, or professional conduct. If you have more questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask!
The "reasonable person doctrine" is considered substantive when assessing negligence or liability. It evaluates whether actions meet the standard of what a reasonable person would do in similar circumstances. This doctrine can be applied in cases involving personal injury, contract disputes, or professional conduct. If you have more questions or need further clarification, feel free to ask!
Then it would be beneficial for me to cite, among other things, the "reasonable person doctrine" as it relates to the professional conduct of the Judges ? Does that sound logical ?
Case Rating: *
Citing the "reasonable person doctrine" regarding judges' professional conduct could be beneficial, especially if arguing that their actions deviated from what a reasonable judge would do under similar circumstances. It might strengthen your case by highlighting expected standards of behavior. If you need more guidance or examples, let me know!
Citing the "reasonable person doctrine" regarding judges' professional conduct could be beneficial, especially if arguing that their actions deviated from what a reasonable judge would do under similar circumstances. It might strengthen your case by highlighting expected standards of behavior. If you need more guidance or examples, let me know!
THX NOW ! are you able to provide more detail relative to: "..deviated from what a reasonable judge would do under similar circumstances. " is there details about what is a reasonable judge would do ?
Case Rating: *
In legal contexts, a "reasonable judge" is expected to uphold judicial integrity, adhere to legal standards, and make fair, unbiased decisions based on evidence and law. When assessing whether a judge deviated from reasonable behavior, consider:
- Adherence to procedural rules.
- Impartiality in decision-making.
- Accurate interpretation and application of the law.
Do you have any specific questions regarding your case or further details you need?
In legal contexts, a "reasonable judge" is expected to uphold judicial integrity, adhere to legal standards, and make fair, unbiased decisions based on evidence and law. When assessing whether a judge deviated from reasonable behavior, consider:
- Adherence to procedural rules.
- Impartiality in decision-making.
- Accurate interpretation and application of the law.
Do you have any specific questions regarding your case or further details you need?
The "reasonable judge" could be extremely impactful in my case. I'm Starting off with an Introduction that seeks to confirm that the judiciary has both a history of and since @))an aggravation of BIAS AND PREJUDICE IN PRO SE CIVIL CASES.and on-going
Case Rating: *
Your situation with potential bias and prejudice in pro se civil cases is significant. To strengthen your introduction, consider highlighting:
- Historical cases or studies showing bias in pro se civil cases.
- Examples of judicial misconduct or bias impacting pro se litigants.
- Relevant statistics or reports demonstrating ongoing issues.
If you need more specific examples or guidance, feel free to ask!
Your situation with potential bias and prejudice in pro se civil cases is significant. To strengthen your introduction, consider highlighting:
- Historical cases or studies showing bias in pro se civil cases.
- Examples of judicial misconduct or bias impacting pro se litigants.
- Relevant statistics or reports demonstrating ongoing issues.
If you need more specific examples or guidance, feel free to ask!
I'm thinking...... if I present an "incontrovertible" history of Pro Se civil case BIAS and PREJUDICE then when I start discussing my own case....the Court wil already be predisposed and sympathetic to my case !!! Pretty Good Strategy, 'eh ?
Case Rating: *
Presenting a history of bias and prejudice in pro se civil cases could potentially create a sympathetic environment for your case. However, courts focus on evidence and legal arguments related to the specific case. Make sure your arguments are well-supported and relevant. If you need more guidance on gathering evidence or structuring your argument, feel free to ask!
Presenting a history of bias and prejudice in pro se civil cases could potentially create a sympathetic environment for your case. However, courts focus on evidence and legal arguments related to the specific case. Make sure your arguments are well-supported and relevant. If you need more guidance on gathering evidence or structuring your argument, feel free to ask!
OK if you have more guidance on gathering beyond Case Law, please tell me ! Please include more information on structuring my argument
Case Rating: *
To strengthen your argument beyond case law, consider these strategies:
- Statistical Evidence: Gather data on bias against pro se litigants, possibly from legal reports or studies.
- Expert Testimony: Consider including opinions or analyses from legal experts on judicial bias.
- Historical Context: Provide background on systemic issues faced by pro se litigants.
- Personal Narrative: Clearly articulate your experience and how it aligns with broader trends.
If you need more specific guidance or examples, feel free to ask!
To strengthen your argument beyond case law, consider these strategies:
- Statistical Evidence: Gather data on bias against pro se litigants, possibly from legal reports or studies.
- Expert Testimony: Consider including opinions or analyses from legal experts on judicial bias.
- Historical Context: Provide background on systemic issues faced by pro se litigants.
- Personal Narrative: Clearly articulate your experience and how it aligns with broader trends.
If you need more specific guidance or examples, feel free to ask!
Can you explain what systemic issues are in this sentence ?Historical Context: Provide background on systemic issues faced by pro se litigants.
Case Rating: *
Systemic issues faced by pro se litigants refer to ongoing, widespread challenges within the legal system that disproportionately affect individuals representing themselves. These may include:
- Lack of access to legal resources or information.
- Bias or prejudice from judges and opposing parties.
- Inequitable treatment compared to represented parties.
- Complexity of legal procedures and terminology.
If you have more questions or need specific examples, feel free to ask!
Systemic issues faced by pro se litigants refer to ongoing, widespread challenges within the legal system that disproportionately affect individuals representing themselves. These may include:
- Lack of access to legal resources or information.
- Bias or prejudice from judges and opposing parties.
- Inequitable treatment compared to represented parties.
- Complexity of legal procedures and terminology.
If you have more questions or need specific examples, feel free to ask!
WHOA ! GREAT ! i just read an article citing a huge drop in Pro Se Civil Cases vis a vis Civil cases represented by an attorney Perfect info from legal wexperts ! YAY
Case Rating: *
It's interesting to see trends in legal representation. A drop in pro se cases might indicate changes in legal accessibility or the effectiveness of legal assistance. If you have any specific questions or need more information on this topic, feel free to ask!
It's interesting to see trends in legal representation. A drop in pro se cases might indicate changes in legal accessibility or the effectiveness of legal assistance. If you have any specific questions or need more information on this topic, feel free to ask!
I double check the timeframe over which this drop occurred...I do recall the drop in pro se case
Case Rating: *
It sounds like you're working on understanding trends in pro se civil cases. If this drop took place during a specific timeframe, it might be useful to explore factors such as changes in legal aid availability or court policies. Do you have more questions or need guidance on how these trends could impact your case?
It sounds like you're working on understanding trends in pro se civil cases. If this drop took place during a specific timeframe, it might be useful to explore factors such as changes in legal aid availability or court policies. Do you have more questions or need guidance on how these trends could impact your case?
I'll check the timeframe....i do recall the drop in Pro Se case filings dropped as much as * and * times what it had been for the given timeframes...Very Significant !!!
Case Rating: *
It seems you have a significant issue involving judicial misconduct and potential bias against pro se litigants. Understanding the timeframe and reasons behind the drop in pro se case filings could provide valuable context for your argument. If you need further guidance or have more questions, feel free to ask!
It seems you have a significant issue involving judicial misconduct and potential bias against pro se litigants. Understanding the timeframe and reasons behind the drop in pro se case filings could provide valuable context for your argument. If you need further guidance or have more questions, feel free to ask!
WOW I didn't think about adding the drop in Pro Se Cases to my argument !. But as you note, it's a great match and will strenthen my argument ! Touche (accent aigu)
Case Rating: *
It's great that you're considering incorporating the drop in pro se cases into your argument; it can strengthen your case by highlighting potential biases. If you need more guidance on how to integrate this information or have other questions, feel free to ask!
It's great that you're considering incorporating the drop in pro se cases into your argument; it can strengthen your case by highlighting potential biases. If you need more guidance on how to integrate this information or have other questions, feel free to ask!
I will be back tomorrow !
Case Rating: *
It looks like you're delving into the intricacies of judicial misconduct and bias in pro se cases with thoughtful strategies. If you ever need further assistance or guidance on these matters, feel free to reach out. Good luck with your research and argument preparation!
It looks like you're delving into the intricacies of judicial misconduct and bias in pro se cases with thoughtful strategies. If you ever need further assistance or guidance on these matters, feel free to reach out. Good luck with your research and argument preparation!
Thanks for your help !
Case Rating: *
You're diving deep into a complex legal matter involving judicial misconduct and bias against pro se litigants. It seems like you're crafting a well-researched argument, which is essential. If you decide to seek professional legal advice or need more detailed assistance, I'm here to help. Good luck with your ongoing efforts!
You're diving deep into a complex legal matter involving judicial misconduct and bias against pro se litigants. It seems like you're crafting a well-researched argument, which is essential. If you decide to seek professional legal advice or need more detailed assistance, I'm here to help. Good luck with your ongoing efforts!
Start a new chat