Structural Defects In Appeals

hi, can you provide more detail on what constitutes, " Structural defects " AND, how would Structural defects apply to an Appeal ?

YIKES 9th Circuit, sorry

Sure. My intent is prove Fraud UPON the Court for my Appeal that was dismissed in 9th Circuit Court due to lies by the * judge panel and Appelllee

Not Yet. I need some more help, first, on defining the applicability of "Structural defects " at the 9th Circuit Appeals Court level. Or, are Structural defects relative ONLY to lower court preoceedings?

Geez, both procedural and substantive issues ! Violation of Due Process. Jurisdiction is fine.

yes, help with Violation of due process. BUT, what's odd is that my entire Opening Brief for my Appeal detailed how my lower court Dismissal was VOID due to breaches of the * core requirements of the 14th Amendment !

yes please

not yet.....BUT this is nutty !!! my Opening Brief for the Appeals Court did exactly what you've noted would be requisite to prove Due Process Violations

Here goes. How would I prove at the Appeals Court level that my Due Process Rights Violated.

Would you detail the legal standards and steps most appropriate to proving Appeals Court Violation ? Thx

Anything else you would detail regarding guidance for proving Appeals Court violationof my Due Process Rights

It's just very odd. In my Opening Brief I detailed each item you listed. I'm thinking... I would provide, relative to the 9th Circuit Appeal's Court, the evidence of the same breaches of * Core requirements of the 14th Amendment

Would it be appropriate to draw parallels between Due Process Breaches at both the lower court and Appeals Court levels ?

AND !!! BEST, the parallels would support by own experience which underscores the increase in Pro Se bias and prejudice.....across the Judicial Environment, esp since the * Twombly decision. ( I have the statisitics to back this up)

Man, this is great !! In my Introduction where I explain I could just briefly refer to my own experience of violations Due Process Rights! I bet the reference to own experience would catch readers' attention. They'd be wondering....Now, exactly, what's her own experience and how does it support claims of, not only Pro Se Bias & prejudice, BUT ALSO violations of Pro Se Due Process Rights. I'm thinking; Both Bias and Prejudice result from violations of Due Process Rights OR is it more appropriate to prove Bias and Prejudice prove violations of Due Process Rights. What do you think would have the most impact for the readers ??

I think I get it.....Focus on violations of Due Process Rights of he 14th Amendment...That's far more the weightier issue ! I think I am starting to "visualize" the organization of my presentation. The presentation could really PACK A PUNCH !!

PERFECT ! THANK YOU !

I think this may well make an AWESOME Writ of Certiorari !! I think my chances of SCOTUS hearing my Writ is pretty high because my Writ addresses a Very Controversial Decision by SCOTUS and because U believe my Writ convincingly tears down the very foundations upon which SCOTUS founded their * Twombly decision.

Yes ! WOW !

You know me !!! ....Not yet.....I do tons of research...as you can see, then, I try to logically organize my arguments for maximum impact on the reader. so (*) I'll get my Motion for Fraud Upon the Court finished. THEN, I'll have your help in seeking legal advisement ! Many thanks !

I do think so, too ! When it comes to defeating social injustices, I'm like an attack dog ! Well, not quite like that !!! : ) : ) See you later !

I'll be back, ultimately, will seek legal counsel !!! thanks for your help !

dlc

Hi, at the Appellate level, with cases in a Circuit Court, which Rules prevail, FRCP of FRAP OR both ?

Let's see. I'm thinking of Legal Errors: Errors of law, Errors of Face, Procedural Errors there's * more. Do they fall under FRCP ?

Absolutely ! In my Opening Brief, I explain the role of these Legal Errors in my arguments declaring the lower court's judgment VOID. ...There are other FRCP that play significant roles in my Opening Brief, also.

Hmmm, I think your reference to "...details on how specific errors influence appeal outcomes ..." This is because I also explained several lower court procedural errors in my Opening Brief. I cited "Offers of Proof" For example, in the lower court, I made several requests of the court to review (*) my year of documented evidence and (*) my Demand for Jury Trial.

Yes, please

Do you have more details, especially referring to those other cases, "...- Legal Precedents: Cite relevant cases that highlight the importance of procedural fairness."

From your comments, I believe you're referring to those * Core Requirements of Due Process ? Is that accurate ?

My entire Opening Brief, whose end goal was to find the lower Court's judgment VOID, was based upon the lower court's breaches of these * Core Requirements of Due Process. I provided documented evidence, case law, FRCPs for each of the * Core Requirements. I really had an involuable case ! As an aside, It's so sad that the * judge panel and the Appellee felt they could break laws and render the Judicial Machinery moot without consequence ! This really tragic scenario, fits right in with my Introduction's discussion of IMPUNITY, PRO SE BIAS AND PREJUDICE, my statistics, my case law.

You can understand why much of the content for my Motion for Fraud UPON the Court will be simply Copy & Paste !

Here's another....The legal research I'm doing, especially case law, is not distinguishing between Fraud ON the Court (Fraud between parties, documents) with Fraud UPON the Court which cripples the Judiciary Machinery. I think it will be critical for me to emphasize this distinction in my Motion. In my case there were BOTH...On the Court by the Appellee and UPON the Court by the * judge panel.

I think the following scenario describes how both occurred in my case. The Appellee, in their Motion to Strike to the Court, reported their falsified content of my Motion for Reply Replacement and my Request for Relief. BUT, HERE'S what takes it further and worse?? The Court then relied upon the Appellee's false content to grant Appellee's Strike, deny all my other pending Motions, and dismissed my case. Now, I think that the Court breached some law or FRAP by relying only upon Appellee's Strike content. Whether the Strike was falsified or not, doesn't matter. What matters in that the * judge panel acted such that they breached the Judicial Machinery. Is this correct ?

Would you provide a bit more detail on violations of procedural standards.

The one other judicial action that we've discussed earlier is how do I confirm the * judges did not

This item: - "Reviewing court records and transcripts for inconsistencies." is CRITICAL. If I can prove the * judges DID NOT read my Requests and Motions OR if I can prove the * judges DID read my Requests and Motions, either way, THE * JUDGES made several mistakes. They breached Procedures, they relied upon false content from Appellee to grant his Strike, they demonstrated an absence of Impartiality, these actions (*) denied me my Due Process Rights AND (*) denied the first order requirement of upholding the Judicial Machinery. Would you add something else here ?

Not Yet. At this time, I need this information for "Reviewing court records and transcripts for inconsistencies." Of course I don't trust the Court, and I do have a way to question the Clerk of the Court, anonymously, to get the needed information on how to determine if the * judge panel read or acknowledged my Requests and Motions. Be back later today. Thank you for your help !