TRY ME!
Younger And Feldman Doctrines Impact
Full Conversation
i filed a * suit for constitutional violations
Thank you for providing that information. To better assist you, could you please clarify if your Section * lawsuit for constitutional violations is currently being challenged under the doctrines of Younger and Feldman in state court or federal court?
technically no they are implying i am there to overturn state judgements
Thank you for the clarification. Based on your situation:
- The Younger doctrine generally prevents federal courts from interfering with ongoing state proceedings.
- The Rooker-Feldman doctrine prevents federal courts from reviewing state court decisions.
Do you need guidance on how these doctrines might affect your Section * lawsuit?
- The Younger doctrine generally prevents federal courts from interfering with ongoing state proceedings.
- The Rooker-Feldman doctrine prevents federal courts from reviewing state court decisions.
Do you need guidance on how these doctrines might affect your Section * lawsuit?
i need guidence on how to defend these doctrines aside from the ex parte young
Hello! I understand you're looking for guidance on defending against the Younger and Rooker-Feldman doctrines in your Section * lawsuit. Here are some general points:
- **Younger Doctrine**: Argue that the state proceedings are not ongoing or that they do not involve important state interests.
- **Rooker-Feldman Doctrine**: Argue that your federal claim is independent of the state court judgment and not seeking to overturn it.
Would you like more specific information on these arguments?
- **Younger Doctrine**: Argue that the state proceedings are not ongoing or that they do not involve important state interests.
- **Rooker-Feldman Doctrine**: Argue that your federal claim is independent of the state court judgment and not seeking to overturn it.
Would you like more specific information on these arguments?
give me an example of a document that would challenge a judges immunity of her actions
Challenging a judge's immunity is a complex legal action. Generally, judges have absolute immunity from lawsuits for their judicial actions. However, if you believe a judge acted outside their judicial capacity or in the clear absence of all jurisdiction, you might attempt to challenge their immunity.
Here's an example of a document's structure that could be used to challenge a judge's immunity:
---
Case No. [Your Case Number]Here's an example of a document's structure that could be used to challenge a judge's immunity:
---
United States District Court
v.
[Judge's Name], Defendant [Your District Name]
[Your Name], Plaintiffv.
Motion to Challenge Judicial Immunity
**Plaintiff’s Motion to Challenge the Judicial Immunity of [Judge’s Name]**
**I. Introduction**
Plaintiff [Your Name] respectfully submits this motion to challenge the judicial immunity of Defendant [Judge's Name] in connection with actions taken during [specific case details].
**II. Background**
Provide a brief summary of the case, including:
- The specific actions taken by the judge.
- The context in which these actions were taken.
**III. Argument**
**A. Actions Outside Judicial Capacity**
- Describe how the judge's actions were not performed in their judicial capacity.
- Provide specific examples and evidence supporting your claim.
**B. Actions
**Plaintiff’s Motion to Challenge the Judicial Immunity of [Judge’s Name]**
**I. Introduction**
Plaintiff [Your Name] respectfully submits this motion to challenge the judicial immunity of Defendant [Judge's Name] in connection with actions taken during [specific case details].
**II. Background**
Provide a brief summary of the case, including:
- The specific actions taken by the judge.
- The context in which these actions were taken.
**III. Argument**
**A. Actions Outside Judicial Capacity**
- Describe how the judge's actions were not performed in their judicial capacity.
- Provide specific examples and evidence supporting your claim.
**B. Actions
family court case law where relief was in excess of * million for juduciial misconduct
Hello! I understand you're looking for case law related to judicial misconduct in family court with relief exceeding $* million. Such cases are rare and highly specific. Could you provide more details about the misconduct or the context of the situation in Kentucky? This will help me assist you better.
intent to cause harm, financial abuse, emotional abuse, alienation, loss of companonship, procedural and due process and equal protection violations, illegal ruling creating financial burdens and emotional stress
Thank you for providing more details. Here are some general points regarding judicial misconduct and potential relief:
- **Judicial Immunity**: Judges typically have absolute immunity for judicial actions unless they act outside their judicial capacity or in clear absence of all jurisdiction.
- **Section * Claims**: To challenge a judge under Section *, demonstrate that actions were not judicial or jurisdictional.
Would you like more information on filing a specific type of motion or case law examples?
- **Judicial Immunity**: Judges typically have absolute immunity for judicial actions unless they act outside their judicial capacity or in clear absence of all jurisdiction.
- **Section * Claims**: To challenge a judge under Section *, demonstrate that actions were not judicial or jurisdictional.
Would you like more information on filing a specific type of motion or case law examples?
she allowed mother to abuse and false accuser me and disregard evidence
I'm sorry to hear about your situation. To assist you further, could you please clarify whether you are currently involved in any ongoing court proceedings in Kentucky, and if so, what stage they are at? This will help in providing more accurate information regarding your case.
yes provide examples of demonstrating her actions
I'm sorry to hear about your situation. To provide the best guidance, could you clarify whether you are looking for examples of how to present evidence of the judge's actions, or are you seeking examples of past cases where judicial misconduct was successfully demonstrated?
yes
Thank you for clarifying. Here are some general steps on how to present evidence of judicial misconduct:
- **Document all instances**: Keep detailed records of all occurrences, including dates, times, and specific actions.
- **Gather supporting evidence**: Collect any relevant documents, emails, or recordings that support your claims.
- **Witness statements**: Obtain statements from any witnesses who observed the judge's misconduct.
- **File a motion**: Submit a motion to the court detailing the misconduct with all supporting evidence.
Would you like an example of a past case where judicial misconduct was successfully demonstrated?
- **Document all instances**: Keep detailed records of all occurrences, including dates, times, and specific actions.
- **Gather supporting evidence**: Collect any relevant documents, emails, or recordings that support your claims.
- **Witness statements**: Obtain statements from any witnesses who observed the judge's misconduct.
- **File a motion**: Submit a motion to the court detailing the misconduct with all supporting evidence.
Would you like an example of a past case where judicial misconduct was successfully demonstrated?
yes
Here is an example of a past case where judicial misconduct was successfully demonstrated:
**Case:** *Stump v. Sparkman*, * U.S. * (*)
**Summary:**
- **Background**: A judge authorized the sterilization of a minor without her knowledge or consent.
- **Outcome**: The Supreme Court ruled that the judge was immune because he acted within his judicial capacity, despite the questionable nature of his actions.
**Key Points:**
- **Judicial Immunity**: Judges generally have immunity for actions within their judicial capacity.
- **Exceptions**: Immunity does not cover actions outside judicial capacity or in clear absence of jurisdiction.
Would you like more specific case law examples or information on filing a specific motion?
**Case:** *Stump v. Sparkman*, * U.S. * (*)
**Summary:**
- **Background**: A judge authorized the sterilization of a minor without her knowledge or consent.
- **Outcome**: The Supreme Court ruled that the judge was immune because he acted within his judicial capacity, despite the questionable nature of his actions.
**Key Points:**
- **Judicial Immunity**: Judges generally have immunity for actions within their judicial capacity.
- **Exceptions**: Immunity does not cover actions outside judicial capacity or in clear absence of jurisdiction.
Would you like more specific case law examples or information on filing a specific motion?
i want a case showing the judge was not immune \
Hello! Here's an example of a case where judicial immunity was not granted:
**Case:** *Forrester v. White*, * U.S. * (*)
**Summary:**
- **Background**: A probation officer sued a judge for demotion and dismissal.
- **Outcome**: The Supreme Court held that the judge did not have immunity because the actions were administrative, not judicial.
**Key Points:**
- **Judicial Immunity**: Applies to judicial acts only.
- **Administrative Acts**: Judges can be held liable for non-judicial actions, like employment decisions.
Would you like more examples or further details on this case?
**Case:** *Forrester v. White*, * U.S. * (*)
**Summary:**
- **Background**: A probation officer sued a judge for demotion and dismissal.
- **Outcome**: The Supreme Court held that the judge did not have immunity because the actions were administrative, not judicial.
**Key Points:**
- **Judicial Immunity**: Applies to judicial acts only.
- **Administrative Acts**: Judges can be held liable for non-judicial actions, like employment decisions.
Would you like more examples or further details on this case?
could calculations of child support be considered adminstrative and her failure to calculate correctly
In Kentucky, the calculation of child support can be considered an administrative function. If a judge fails to calculate child support correctly, it might challenge their judicial immunity if it falls outside their judicial capacity.
Would you like more information on how to proceed with this claim?
Would you like more information on how to proceed with this claim?
yes
To proceed with a claim related to the miscalculation of child support, consider the following steps:
- **Document Errors**: Keep detailed records of any miscalculations, including specific discrepancies and how they impact you.
- **Gather Evidence**: Collect all relevant financial documents, court orders, and communication related to child support calculations.
- **File a Motion**: Submit a motion to the court outlining the judge's administrative errors, with supporting evidence.
Would you like an example of how to draft this motion?
- **Document Errors**: Keep detailed records of any miscalculations, including specific discrepancies and how they impact you.
- **Gather Evidence**: Collect all relevant financial documents, court orders, and communication related to child support calculations.
- **File a Motion**: Submit a motion to the court outlining the judge's administrative errors, with supporting evidence.
Would you like an example of how to draft this motion?
yes
Here’s an example of how to draft a motion challenging the administrative error in child support calculations:
---
---
United States District Court
[Your District Name]
**[Your Name], Plaintiff**
**v.**
**[Judge's Name], Defendant**
**Case No. [Your Case Number]**
**Motion to Challenge Child Support Calculations**
**I. Introduction**
Plaintiff [Your Name] respectfully submits this motion to challenge the child support calculations made by Defendant [Judge's Name].
**II. Background**
Provide a brief summary of the case, including:
- The specific child support miscalculations.
- The context in which these miscalculations were made.
- How these errors have impacted you financially and emotionally.
**III. Argument**
**A. Administrative Error**
- Describe the specific miscalculations made by the judge.
- Provide detailed examples and evidence supporting your claim, including financial documents and court orders.
- Explain how the miscalculations fall outside the judge’s judicial capacity and should be considered administrative errors.
**B. Impact on Plaintiff**
- Detail how these miscalculations have caused financial burdens and emotional stress.
- Include any relevant witness statements or expert analysis to support your claim.
**IV.
**[Your Name], Plaintiff**
**v.**
**[Judge's Name], Defendant**
**Case No. [Your Case Number]**
**Motion to Challenge Child Support Calculations**
**I. Introduction**
Plaintiff [Your Name] respectfully submits this motion to challenge the child support calculations made by Defendant [Judge's Name].
**II. Background**
Provide a brief summary of the case, including:
- The specific child support miscalculations.
- The context in which these miscalculations were made.
- How these errors have impacted you financially and emotionally.
**III. Argument**
**A. Administrative Error**
- Describe the specific miscalculations made by the judge.
- Provide detailed examples and evidence supporting your claim, including financial documents and court orders.
- Explain how the miscalculations fall outside the judge’s judicial capacity and should be considered administrative errors.
**B. Impact on Plaintiff**
- Detail how these miscalculations have caused financial burdens and emotional stress.
- Include any relevant witness statements or expert analysis to support your claim.
**IV.
family court case law over * million
I'm here to help. For a case involving judicial misconduct in family court with relief exceeding $* million, it's important to note such cases are rare and complex. Here are general points to consider:
- **Document Misconduct**: Keep detailed records of all instances of misconduct.
- **Gather Evidence**: Collect relevant documents, witness statements, and any supportive evidence.
- **File a Motion**: Submit a motion detailing the misconduct and its impact.
Would you like more specific examples of past cases or guidance on filing the motion?
- **Document Misconduct**: Keep detailed records of all instances of misconduct.
- **Gather Evidence**: Collect relevant documents, witness statements, and any supportive evidence.
- **File a Motion**: Submit a motion detailing the misconduct and its impact.
Would you like more specific examples of past cases or guidance on filing the motion?
can you provide case law for this
To assist you with case law related to judicial misconduct in a family court case with significant relief, here are a couple of examples:
**Example Case *:**
- **Case:** *Pulliam v. Allen*, * U.S. * (*)
- **Summary:**
- **Background:** A judge was sued under Section * for issuing an arrest warrant without probable cause.
- **Outcome:** The judge was held liable because injunctive relief and attorney's fees were granted despite judicial immunity, showing that judges can be accountable under certain circumstances.
- **Key Points:** Judicial immunity does not cover prospective relief and attorney's fees under Section *.
**Example Case *:**
- **Case:** *Forrester v. White*, * U.S. * (*)
- **Summary:**
- **Background:** A probation officer sued a judge for demotion and dismissal.
- **Outcome:** The judge did not have immunity because the actions were administrative, not judicial.
- **Key Points:** Judicial immunity applies to judicial acts only; administrative acts are not covered.
Would you like more detailed information on these cases or further guidance on how to proceed with your motion?
**Example Case *:**
- **Case:** *Pulliam v. Allen*, * U.S. * (*)
- **Summary:**
- **Background:** A judge was sued under Section * for issuing an arrest warrant without probable cause.
- **Outcome:** The judge was held liable because injunctive relief and attorney's fees were granted despite judicial immunity, showing that judges can be accountable under certain circumstances.
- **Key Points:** Judicial immunity does not cover prospective relief and attorney's fees under Section *.
**Example Case *:**
- **Case:** *Forrester v. White*, * U.S. * (*)
- **Summary:**
- **Background:** A probation officer sued a judge for demotion and dismissal.
- **Outcome:** The judge did not have immunity because the actions were administrative, not judicial.
- **Key Points:** Judicial immunity applies to judicial acts only; administrative acts are not covered.
Would you like more detailed information on these cases or further guidance on how to proceed with your motion?
i want * million or more award list me * case laws
I'm here to help. However, cases awarding $* million or more for judicial misconduct in family court are exceptionally rare. Below are some significant cases involving large awards or notable judicial misconduct:
*. **Pulliam v. Allen**, * U.S. * (*)
*. **Forrester v. White**, * U.S. * (*)
*. **Pierson v. Ray**, * U.S. * (*)
*. **Stump v. Sparkman**, * U.S. * (*)
*. **Dennis v. Sparks**, * U.S. * (*)
*. **Scheuer v. Rhodes**, * U.S. * (*)
*. **Bradley v. Fisher**, * Wall. * (*)
*. **Harlow v. Fitzgerald**, * U.S. * (*)
*. **Hafer v. Melo**, * U.S. * (*)
*. **Buckley v. Fitzsimmons**, * U.S. * (*)
Would you like more information on any of these cases?
*. **Pulliam v. Allen**, * U.S. * (*)
*. **Forrester v. White**, * U.S. * (*)
*. **Pierson v. Ray**, * U.S. * (*)
*. **Stump v. Sparkman**, * U.S. * (*)
*. **Dennis v. Sparks**, * U.S. * (*)
*. **Scheuer v. Rhodes**, * U.S. * (*)
*. **Bradley v. Fisher**, * Wall. * (*)
*. **Harlow v. Fitzgerald**, * U.S. * (*)
*. **Hafer v. Melo**, * U.S. * (*)
*. **Buckley v. Fitzsimmons**, * U.S. * (*)
Would you like more information on any of these cases?
Fagan v. Fagan (New York
Hello! It seems like you might be referring to a specific case, *Fagan v. Fagan*. Could you please provide more details about how this case relates to your situation in Kentucky? This will help me provide more precise information and guidance.
Pagano v. McKenzie (Florida
Thank you for the clarification. Unfortunately, I don't have specific information on the *Pagano v. McKenzie* case. Could you please provide details on how this case is relevant to your situation in Kentucky? This will help me provide better guidance.
Dunbar v. Toney from *
Dunbar v. Toney from *
Hello! It appears you are referring to the case *Dunbar v. Toney* from *. Could you please provide more context or details about how this case is relevant to your current legal situation in Kentucky? This will help me provide more specific and relevant information.
*. Challenging Judge Perlows Judicial Immunity:
The following actions by the judge constitute administrative errors and misconduct, which are not protected by judicial immunity:
Failing to Require Temporary Custody Order: The judge failed to require the mother to obtain a temporary custody order despite parental interference, and required the plaintiff to attend mediation with the non-custodial parent as the decision maker.
Annulling Back Child Support Without Motion: The judge annulled the mother's back child support without a proper motion.
Changing Custody Before Hearing: The judge changed custody before a court hearing, denying the plaintiff the opportunity to be heard.
Ex Parte Communications: The judge engaged in ex parte communications with the opposing attorney.
Incorrect Child Support Calculations: The judge administered child support calculations incorrectly and refused to modify them for the plaintiff.
Erasing Debt Owed to Plaintiff: The judge erased a debt owed to the plaintiff without proper legal procedures.
Allowing Unqualified Counselor to Restrict Visitation: The judge allowed an unqualified counselor to restrict the plaintiff's visitation without reason or consequence.
Holding Plaintiff in Contempt of Court: The judge held the plaintiff in contempt of court with the threat of jail.
Ordering Payment of Attorney's Fees: The judge ordered the plaintiff to pay the mother's attorney's fees for the administrative dismissal of evidence.
Refusing to Allow Evidence: The judge refused to allow the plaintiff to provide important evidence.
Dismissing Plaintiff's Evidence: The judge dismissed the plaintiff's evidence and consistently ruled in favor of the mother despite contrary indications.
Ordering Plaintiff to Work on Anger Issues: The judge ordered the plaintiff to work on anger issues based on a misinterpreted statement.
Allowing Perjury and False Accusations: The judge allowed perjury, defamation, untrue affidavits, and false accusations against the plaintiff without consequence.
Allowing Parental Alienation: The judge allowed the mother to ignore court orders and alienate the child from the plaintiff.
Predetermined Ruling on Rule *.* Motions: The judge indicated a predetermined outcome on Rule *.* motions, denying due process.
Failure to Investigate Complaint: The Judicial Conduct Commission failed to investigate the complaint against Judge Perlow.
Accepting New Order and Dismissing Previous Order: The child support office accepted Judge Perlow's new order and dismissed the previous order without proper legal procedures.
*. Plaintiffs Relief intent is explained here: to be filed during discovery
Motion for Relief Under Rule *(b)
IV. Judicial Immunity Argument
A. Administrative Errors and Misconduct
Failing to Require Temporary Custody Order: The judge failed to require the mother to obtain a temporary custody order despite parental interference, and required the plaintiff to attend mediation with the non-custodial parent as the decision maker.
Annulling Back Child Support Without Motion: The judge annulled the mother's back child support without a proper motion.
Changing Custody Before Hearing: The judge change custody before a court hearing, denying the plaintiff the opportunity to be heard.
Ex Parte Communications: The judge engaged in ex parte communications with the opposing attorney.
Incorrect Child Support Calculations: The judge administered child support calculations incorrectly and refused to modify them for the plaintiff.
Erasing Debt Owed to Plaintiff: The judge erased a debt owed to the plaintiff without proper legal procedures.
Allowing Unqualified Counselor to Restrict Visitation: The judge allowed an unqualified counselor to restrict the plaintiff's visitation without reason or consequence.
Holding Plaintiff in Contempt of Court: The judge held the plaintiff in contempt of court with the threat of jail.
Ordering Payment of Attorney's Fees: The judge ordered the plaintiff to pay the mother's attorney's fees for the administrative dismissal of evidence.
Refusing to Allow Evidence: The judge refused to allow the plaintiff to provide important evidence.
Dismissing Plaintiff's Evidence: The judge dismissed the plaintiff's evidence and consistently ruled in favor of the mother despite contrary indications.
Ordering Plaintiff to Work on Anger Issues: The judge ordered the plaintiff to work on anger issues based on a misinterpreted statement.
Allowing Perjury and False Accusations: The judge allowed perjury, defamation, untrue affidavits, and false accusations against the plaintiff without consequence.
Allowing Parental Alienation: The judge allowed the mother to ignore court orders and alienate the child from the plaintiff.
Predetermined Ruling on Rule *.* Motions: The judge indicated a predetermined outcome on Rule *.* motions, denying due process.
Failure to Investigate Complaint: The Judicial Conduct Commission failed to investigate the complaint against Judge Perlow.
Accepting New Order and Dismissing Previous Order: The child support office accepted Judge Perlow's new order and dismissed the previous order without proper legal procedures.
*. Federal Jurisdiction and Relative law
can i write this in response *. Challenging Judge Perlows Judicial Immunity:
The following actions by the judge constitute administrative errors and misconduct, which are not protected by judicial immunity:
Failing to Require Temporary Custody Order: The judge failed to require the mother to obtain a temporary custody order despite parental interference, and required the plaintiff to attend mediation with the non-custodial parent as the decision maker.
Annulling Back Child Support Without Motion: The judge annulled the mother's back child support without a proper motion.
Changing Custody Before Hearing: The judge changed custody before a court hearing, denying the plaintiff the opportunity to be heard.
Ex Parte Communications: The judge engaged in ex parte communications with the opposing attorney.
Incorrect Child Support Calculations: The judge administered child support calculations incorrectly and refused to modify them for the plaintiff.
Erasing Debt Owed to Plaintiff: The judge erased a debt owed to the plaintiff without proper legal procedures.
Allowing Unqualified Counselor to Restrict Visitation: The judge allowed an unqualified counselor to restrict the plaintiff's visitation without reason or consequence.
Holding Plaintiff in Contempt of Court: The judge held the plaintiff in contempt of court with the threat of jail.
Ordering Payment of Attorney's Fees: The judge ordered the plaintiff to pay the mother's attorney's fees for the administrative dismissal of evidence.
Refusing to Allow Evidence: The judge refused to allow the plaintiff to provide important evidence.
Dismissing Plaintiff's Evidence: The judge dismissed the plaintiff's evidence and consistently ruled in favor of the mother despite contrary indications.
Ordering Plaintiff to Work on Anger Issues: The judge ordered the plaintiff to work on anger issues based on a misinterpreted statement.
Allowing Perjury and False Accusations: The judge allowed perjury, defamation, untrue affidavits, and false accusations against the plaintiff without consequence.
Allowing Parental Alienation: The judge allowed the mother to ignore court orders and alienate the child from the plaintiff.
Predetermined Ruling on Rule *.* Motions: The judge indicated a predetermined outcome on Rule *.* motions, denying due process.
Failure to Investigate Complaint: The Judicial Conduct Commission failed to investigate the complaint against Judge Perlow.
Accepting New Order and Dismissing Previous Order: The child support office accepted Judge Perlow's new order and dismissed the previous order without proper legal procedures.
*. Plaintiffs Relief intent is explained here: to be filed during discovery
Motion for Relief Under Rule *(b)
IV. Judicial Immunity Argument
A. Administrative Errors and Misconduct
Failing to Require Temporary Custody Order: The judge failed to require the mother to obtain a temporary custody order despite parental interference, and required the plaintiff to attend mediation with the non-custodial parent as the decision maker.
Annulling Back Child Support Without Motion: The judge annulled the mother's back child support without a proper motion.
Changing Custody Before Hearing: The judge change custody before a court hearing, denying the plaintiff the opportunity to be heard.
Ex Parte Communications: The judge engaged in ex parte communications with the opposing attorney.
Incorrect Child Support Calculations: The judge administered child support calculations incorrectly and refused to modify them for the plaintiff.
Erasing Debt Owed to Plaintiff: The judge erased a debt owed to the plaintiff without proper legal procedures.
Allowing Unqualified Counselor to Restrict Visitation: The judge allowed an unqualified counselor to restrict the plaintiff's visitation without reason or consequence.
Holding Plaintiff in Contempt of Court: The judge held the plaintiff in contempt of court with the threat of jail.
Ordering Payment of Attorney's Fees: The judge ordered the plaintiff to pay the mother's attorney's fees for the administrative dismissal of evidence.
Refusing to Allow Evidence: The judge refused to allow the plaintiff to provide important evidence.
Dismissing Plaintiff's Evidence: The judge dismissed the plaintiff's evidence and consistently ruled in favor of the mother despite contrary indications.
Ordering Plaintiff to Work on Anger Issues: The judge ordered the plaintiff to work on anger issues based on a misinterpreted statement.
Allowing Perjury and False Accusations: The judge allowed perjury, defamation, untrue affidavits, and false accusations against the plaintiff without consequence.
Allowing Parental Alienation: The judge allowed the mother to ignore court orders and alienate the child from the plaintiff.
Predetermined Ruling on Rule *.* Motions: The judge indicated a predetermined outcome on Rule *.* motions, denying due process.
Failure to Investigate Complaint: The Judicial Conduct Commission failed to investigate the complaint against Judge Perlow.
Accepting New Order and Dismissing Previous Order: The child support office accepted Judge Perlow's new order and dismissed the previous order without proper legal procedures.
*. Federal Jurisdiction and Relative law
To challenge a judge's judicial immunity in Kentucky, you should outline specific administrative errors and misconduct. Here's a concise example:
---
**United States District Court**
**[Your District Name]**
**[Your Name], Plaintiff**
**v.**
**[Judge's Name], Defendant**
**Case No. [Your Case Number]**
**Motion to Challenge Judicial Immunity**
**I. Introduction**
Plaintiff [Your Name] respectfully submits this motion to challenge the judicial immunity of Defendant [Judge's Name] due to administrative errors and misconduct.
**II. Background**
- The judge failed to require a temporary custody order despite parental interference.
- Annulling back child support without a proper motion.
- Changing custody before a hearing, denying the plaintiff the opportunity to be heard.
- Engaging in ex parte communications with the opposing attorney.
**III. Argument**
**A. Administrative Errors and Misconduct**
- The actions listed above are administrative in nature and do not fall under judicial capacity.
- Provide evidence of specific instances and their impacts.
**B. Impact on Plaintiff**
- Detail the financial and emotional burden caused by these errors, including any witness statements or expert analysis.
---
Would you like further guidance or additional examples?
---
**United States District Court**
**[Your District Name]**
**[Your Name], Plaintiff**
**v.**
**[Judge's Name], Defendant**
**Case No. [Your Case Number]**
**Motion to Challenge Judicial Immunity**
**I. Introduction**
Plaintiff [Your Name] respectfully submits this motion to challenge the judicial immunity of Defendant [Judge's Name] due to administrative errors and misconduct.
**II. Background**
- The judge failed to require a temporary custody order despite parental interference.
- Annulling back child support without a proper motion.
- Changing custody before a hearing, denying the plaintiff the opportunity to be heard.
- Engaging in ex parte communications with the opposing attorney.
**III. Argument**
**A. Administrative Errors and Misconduct**
- The actions listed above are administrative in nature and do not fall under judicial capacity.
- Provide evidence of specific instances and their impacts.
**B. Impact on Plaintiff**
- Detail the financial and emotional burden caused by these errors, including any witness statements or expert analysis.
---
Would you like further guidance or additional examples?
i want to know can i write what i wrote to a defendants response to dismiss my * claim, can i include an example motion of something i plan to file in the future
Yes, you can include an example motion in your response to a defendant's motion to dismiss your Section * claim. Here are some key points to consider:
- **Relevance**: Ensure the example motion is directly relevant to the issues raised in the defendant's motion to dismiss.
- **Clarity**: Clearly explain how the example motion supports your arguments against dismissal.
- **Structure**: Organize your response to include a section where the example motion is presented as a supporting document.
Would you like a sample structure for including the example motion in your response?
- **Relevance**: Ensure the example motion is directly relevant to the issues raised in the defendant's motion to dismiss.
- **Clarity**: Clearly explain how the example motion supports your arguments against dismissal.
- **Structure**: Organize your response to include a section where the example motion is presented as a supporting document.
Would you like a sample structure for including the example motion in your response?
gordon v gordon juducial misconduct explain what about
Hello! To provide some context and help you better understand, the case *Gordon v. Gordon* might involve judicial misconduct, especially if you're referring to a specific instance of judicial errors or misconduct.
Could you please provide more details about how this case relates to your legal situation in Kentucky, such as the type of misconduct and the specific issues involved? This will help me provide more targeted information.
Could you please provide more details about how this case relates to your legal situation in Kentucky, such as the type of misconduct and the specific issues involved? This will help me provide more targeted information.
please provide case law against a judge for over * million for juducial misconduct
Finding case law where a judge was held liable for over $* million for judicial misconduct is rare. However, here are a couple of significant cases involving judicial misconduct:
***. Pulliam v. Allen**, * U.S. * (*)
- **Background**: A judge was sued under Section * for issuing an arrest warrant without probable cause.
- **Outcome**: The judge was held liable because injunctive relief and attorney's fees were granted despite judicial immunity.
- **Key Point**: Judicial immunity does not cover prospective relief and attorney's fees under Section *.
***. Forrester v. White**, * U.S. * (*)
- **Background**: A probation officer sued a judge for demotion and dismissal.
- **Outcome**: The judge did not have immunity because the actions were administrative, not judicial.
- **Key Point**: Judicial immunity only applies to judicial acts; administrative acts are not covered.
These cases highlight circumstances where judicial immunity was challenged. Would you like more information on how to apply this to your situation in Kentucky?
***. Pulliam v. Allen**, * U.S. * (*)
- **Background**: A judge was sued under Section * for issuing an arrest warrant without probable cause.
- **Outcome**: The judge was held liable because injunctive relief and attorney's fees were granted despite judicial immunity.
- **Key Point**: Judicial immunity does not cover prospective relief and attorney's fees under Section *.
***. Forrester v. White**, * U.S. * (*)
- **Background**: A probation officer sued a judge for demotion and dismissal.
- **Outcome**: The judge did not have immunity because the actions were administrative, not judicial.
- **Key Point**: Judicial immunity only applies to judicial acts; administrative acts are not covered.
These cases highlight circumstances where judicial immunity was challenged. Would you like more information on how to apply this to your situation in Kentucky?
what is prospective relief
Hello! Prospective relief is a remedy in a legal case that aims to prevent future harm rather than compensate for past injuries. It typically includes:
- Injunctive relief: Court orders directing a party to do or refrain from specific actions.
- Declaratory relief: Court declarations regarding the rights and legal obligations of parties.
Would you like more detailed information on how prospective relief might apply to your case in Kentucky?
- Injunctive relief: Court orders directing a party to do or refrain from specific actions.
- Declaratory relief: Court declarations regarding the rights and legal obligations of parties.
Would you like more detailed information on how prospective relief might apply to your case in Kentucky?
how about case law for judges actions resulting in loss ov companionship on intentional harm financial and adminsitative violations
Hello! To assist you with case law regarding judges' actions resulting in loss of companionship, intentional harm, financial, and administrative violations, here are some significant cases:
*. **Pulliam v. Allen**, * U.S. * (*)
- **Summary**: A judge was sued under Section * for issuing an arrest warrant without probable cause.
- **Outcome**: The judge was held liable because injunctive relief and attorney's fees were granted despite judicial immunity.
*. **Forrester v. White**, * U.S. * (*)
- **Summary**: A probation officer sued a judge for demotion and dismissal.
- **Outcome**: The judge did not have immunity because the actions were administrative, not judicial.
Would you like more specific details or further guidance on how these cases could apply to your situation in Kentucky?
*. **Pulliam v. Allen**, * U.S. * (*)
- **Summary**: A judge was sued under Section * for issuing an arrest warrant without probable cause.
- **Outcome**: The judge was held liable because injunctive relief and attorney's fees were granted despite judicial immunity.
*. **Forrester v. White**, * U.S. * (*)
- **Summary**: A probation officer sued a judge for demotion and dismissal.
- **Outcome**: The judge did not have immunity because the actions were administrative, not judicial.
Would you like more specific details or further guidance on how these cases could apply to your situation in Kentucky?
how does that relate
I understand your need for clarification. The cases *Pulliam v. Allen* and *Forrester v. White* relate to your situation because:
- **Pulliam v. Allen** demonstrates that a judge can be held accountable under Section * for actions that violate constitutional rights, particularly when prospective relief and attorney's fees are involved.
- **Forrester v. White** shows that judicial immunity does not cover administrative actions, meaning judges can be held liable if their actions are administrative rather than judicial.
These points can support your arguments if you can show that the judge's actions in your case were administrative errors or violations of constitutional rights.
Would you like more details on how to present these arguments in your case?
- **Pulliam v. Allen** demonstrates that a judge can be held accountable under Section * for actions that violate constitutional rights, particularly when prospective relief and attorney's fees are involved.
- **Forrester v. White** shows that judicial immunity does not cover administrative actions, meaning judges can be held liable if their actions are administrative rather than judicial.
These points can support your arguments if you can show that the judge's actions in your case were administrative errors or violations of constitutional rights.
Would you like more details on how to present these arguments in your case?
are both those case with awards over * million
The cases *Pulliam v. Allen* and *Forrester v. White* did not result in awards over $* million. They primarily established important legal precedents regarding judicial immunity and accountability. Large monetary awards for judicial misconduct are extremely rare.
Would you like more information on cases with significant financial awards or guidance on how to argue your case?
Would you like more information on cases with significant financial awards or guidance on how to argue your case?
i would like awards similar to my case that have payouts of over * million against a judge
Hello! Cases with awards of over $* million against a judge are extremely rare and difficult to find. However, I can offer some guidance on how to approach your situation:
*. **Document Evidence**: Collect all relevant documentation and evidence of the judge's misconduct.
*. **Legal Precedents**: Use cases like *Pulliam v. Allen* and *Forrester v. White* to challenge judicial immunity.
*. **Expert Testimony**: Consider obtaining expert testimony to support your claims of financial and emotional harm.
Would you like more specific guidance on any of these steps?
*. **Document Evidence**: Collect all relevant documentation and evidence of the judge's misconduct.
*. **Legal Precedents**: Use cases like *Pulliam v. Allen* and *Forrester v. White* to challenge judicial immunity.
*. **Expert Testimony**: Consider obtaining expert testimony to support your claims of financial and emotional harm.
Would you like more specific guidance on any of these steps?
what about a * suit when the child support, JCC, county attorney and the judge all failed in their duties leading to * serious years of abuse and loss of companonshiop
I'm sorry to hear about your situation. To assist you with a Section * lawsuit in Kentucky, here are some key points to consider:
- **Section * Claims**: This allows individuals to sue for violations of constitutional rights by state actors.
- **Judicial Immunity**: Judges are generally immune from lawsuits for their judicial actions, unless they acted outside their judicial capacity or without jurisdiction.
- **Administrative Acts**: Actions such as incorrect child support calculations might be considered administrative and could challenge judicial immunity.
Could you clarify if you are currently in state or federal court for this lawsuit?
- **Section * Claims**: This allows individuals to sue for violations of constitutional rights by state actors.
- **Judicial Immunity**: Judges are generally immune from lawsuits for their judicial actions, unless they acted outside their judicial capacity or without jurisdiction.
- **Administrative Acts**: Actions such as incorrect child support calculations might be considered administrative and could challenge judicial immunity.
Could you clarify if you are currently in state or federal court for this lawsuit?
federal
Thank you for confirming. To proceed with your Section * lawsuit in federal court, consider the following steps:
- **Document All Failures**: Keep detailed records of the failures by the child support office, Judicial Conduct Commission (JCC), county attorney, and judge.
- **Gather Evidence**: Collect all supporting documents, such as court orders, communication records, and evidence of abuse and loss of companionship.
- **File a Comprehensive Complaint**: Clearly list the constitutional violations and how each party failed in their duties, leading to your suffering.
Would you like an example structure for your Section * complaint?
- **Document All Failures**: Keep detailed records of the failures by the child support office, Judicial Conduct Commission (JCC), county attorney, and judge.
- **Gather Evidence**: Collect all supporting documents, such as court orders, communication records, and evidence of abuse and loss of companionship.
- **File a Comprehensive Complaint**: Clearly list the constitutional violations and how each party failed in their duties, leading to your suffering.
Would you like an example structure for your Section * complaint?
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
for the
Western Division of Kentucky
Ron David Rock
Pro Se
-v-
Judge Perlow, Child Support Enforcement,
County Attorney, Judicial Conduct Comm.
Case No. *:24CV181-BJB
PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT PERLOW MOTION TO DISMISS
COMES NOW the Plaintiff, and respectfully submits this Combined Motion to Dismiss Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, for Summary Judgment, and for Discovery, and in support thereof states as follows
*. INTRODUCTION:
The Plaintiff has clearly sued the Defendants in their individual capacity, as explicitly stated in the complaint filed on *-*-*
Relevant case law, including Monroe v. Pape, Tumey v Ohio (*), In re Murchison (*), Alred . Commonwealth Judicial Conduct Commission (*) supports the Plaintiff's right to sue the Defendants in their individual capacity for actions taken under color of law
The Plaintiff reaffirms the allegations set forth in the original complaint and asserts that the Defendant’s answer fails to adequately address the violations of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights under * U.S. Code § *. The County Attorney and Judge Perlow failed to enforce the Court Orders in place on October *, *. The County Attorney failed to address the delinquent child support issue, and both failed to require Amy to file for temporary custody, thereby violating the Plaintiff's rights.
As previously stated, this case arises under * U.S.C. § *, which addresses violations of constitutional rights. Federal question jurisdiction is established under * U.S.C. § *, as the plaintiffs claims involve violations of the plaintiffs constitutional rights by state actors.
The amended complaint sufficiently addresses the delivery of the complaint and the plaintiff will address the defendants response even though they are tactics of persuasion to detour the case rather than deal with the facts behind it.
*. DENIAL OF DEFENDANT'S CLAIMS:
Plaintiff denies each and every allegation, statement, and defense set forth in the Defendant's answer, except those expressly admitted herein.
Jason Darnall admitting to his actions in his defense
*. REAFFIRMATION OF FACTS:
Constitutional Violations by defendants: here are a few but not limited too
Due Process Violations:
Failing to require the mother to get a temporary custody order when she was in violation of parental interference and requiring the plaintiff to attend mediation with the non custodial parent as the decision maker.
Annulling Amy's back child support without a motion
Changing of custody before a court hearing
ex parte communications
The judge administering child support calculations incorrectly and refusing to calculate or modify calculations for child support for the plaintiff refusing and denying to do this properly
The judge erasing a debt owed to the plaintiff
Allowing an unqualified counselors mother gets to choose to restrict plaintiffs visitation without reason or consequence
currently holding contempt of court over the plaintiff with suggestion of jail
ordering the payment of the mothers attorneys fees for the administrative illegal dismissal of evidence by the judge
Would not let the plaintiff provide evidence important to the case she said she would not allow
The evidence given t0 the judge was dismissed everytime and ruled in favor for the mother when all indications proved otherwise.
ordering the plaintiff to work on anger she wrote in an order when anger was and never has been brought up or an issue, it was a statement about the plaintiff at the counselors office on his phone the secretary made and it suggested he was upset. This was a complete twisting of the facts.
Allowing perjury, defamation, untrue affidavit, and false accusations against the plaintiff for 4 years without any consequence to the mother or mothers party testifying.
allowing the mother to ignore every order made and alienate K.R. from the plaintifF
The denial of the *.* motions for out of time , with statement i have to allow him to do this so we can say we did everything we could, when he goes to appeal made to opposing attorney during a motion hour. Statement already clarified how she was going to rule.
JCC failed to investigate the complaint on Judge Perlow.
The child support office accepted Judge Perlows new order and dismissed the "inextricably intertwined " order of *.
The county attorney railing o enforce a court order
Judicial Misconduct:
Allowing the mother to keep K.R. without following procedures, leading to decision to change custody
Erasing an obligation owed to the plaintiff
Annulling the mothers back child support without a motion
Intentional abuse of finance, mental, and emotional
Not enforcing any law on the mother and witnesses for false accusations with intent to jail the plaintiff
Restricting the plaintiffs visitation for mothers influence
Failing to keep timely court hearings and the development of a plan to adhere to her unjustified restrictions of the plaintiffs visitation with K.R.
JCC chief Justice decision not to investigate Judge Perlow
Child Support Enforcement failed to enforce
Statements made during motion hour
Prosecutorial Misconduct:
Jason Darnall decision not enforce a court order and his actions to stop the police from aiding in custodial interference rather than telling the mother to get a temporary order
Equal Protection Violations:
The Judge nor Mr. Darnall enforced the current court order that was "inevitably intertwined" in the Kentucky court system.
Giving the mother custody decisions without temporary court order or modifying the custody decree.
Child Support Enforcement Act requires the state to act on delinquent payees
Annulling the mothers back child support to create a reason not to hold her in contempt of court for failing to pay child support
The judge and her Administration work up for child support calculations incorrect, refusal and denial to correct
Putting the plaintiff in contempt of court can only be applied because the judge made illegal rulings
Biasl statements suggest interest in mothers prevailing in court
Ex parte conversations are suggested in hearings
The fact that the counselor was a neighbor of Amy and the Judge allowing her to restrict
visitation and file false affidavits without proper cause.
Judge Perlow allowed Amy, Jeanie Cain, and Alexa to file false motions and affidavits all proven untrue; she enabled this without consequence.
Judge Perlow allowed Amy to ask the family counselor to restrict visitation and encourage K.R. to ask for a restriction
Assisting the opposing attorney in court
Failure to Act:
The county attorney's failure to enforce order in place,
Judge Perlows handling of the case failed to address the misconduct of the counselor, Amy, and Alexa for their fictional affidavits with intent to do harm. Clear signs of bias.
Allowing the obstruction of justice and the constant defamation of the plaintiffs character.
Parental Alienation:
Judge Perlows allowance of the mothers actions, which led to the alienation of the plaintiffs daughter
Supporting Evidence:
The presence of video evidence
The documentation that contradicts the counselors and the mothers statements.
*. SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
This case arises under * U.S.C. § *, which provides a remedy for violations of constitutional rights by state actors. Federal question jurisdiction is established under * U.S.C. § *, as the plaintiff's claims involve violations of his constitutional rights by state actors.
* U.S.C. § *: Provides a remedy for violations of constitutional rights by state actors.
* U.S.C. § *: Establishes federal question jurisdiction for cases involving federal law.
Fourteenth Amendment: Guarantees due process and equal protection under the law.
Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, * U.S. * (*): This case outlines the requirements for standing in federal court.
Ex parte Young, * U.S. * (*): Established that federal courts can enjoin state officials from enforcing unconstitutional state laws.
Badgerow v. Walters, *-* (*): Clarified that federal courts have jurisdiction to vacate state court rulings when there is an independent jurisdictional basis, such as a federal question.
*.VENUE:
* U.S. Code § *: This statute governs the general venue requirements for civil actions in federal courts. It states that a civil action may be brought in:
A judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the state in which the district is located.
A judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred.
*. Challenging Judge Perlows Judicial Immunity:
The following actions by the judge constitute administrative errors and misconduct, which are not protected by judicial immunity:
Failing to Require Temporary Custody Order: The judge failed to require the mother to obtain a temporary custody order despite parental interference, and required the plaintiff to attend mediation with the non-custodial parent as the decision maker.
Annulling Back Child Support Without Motion: The judge annulled the mother's back child support without a proper motion.
Changing Custody Before Hearing: The judge changed custody before a court hearing, denying the plaintiff the opportunity to be heard.
Ex Parte Communications: The judge engaged in ex parte communications with the opposing attorney.
Incorrect Child Support Calculations: The judge administered child support calculations incorrectly and refused to modify them for the plaintiff.
Erasing Debt Owed to Plaintiff: The judge erased a debt owed to the plaintiff without proper legal procedures.
Allowing Unqualified Counselor to Restrict Visitation: The judge allowed an unqualified counselor to restrict the plaintiff's visitation without reason or consequence.
Holding Plaintiff in Contempt of Court: The judge held the plaintiff in contempt of court with the threat of jail.
Ordering Payment of Attorney's Fees: The judge ordered the plaintiff to pay the mother's attorney's fees for the administrative dismissal of evidence.
Refusing to Allow Evidence: The judge refused to allow the plaintiff to provide important evidence.
Dismissing Plaintiff's Evidence: The judge dismissed the plaintiff's evidence and consistently ruled in favor of the mother despite contrary indications.
Ordering Plaintiff to Work on Anger Issues: The judge ordered the plaintiff to work on anger issues based on a misinterpreted statement.
Allowing Perjury and False Accusations: The judge allowed perjury, defamation, untrue affidavits, and false accusations against the plaintiff without consequence.
Allowing Parental Alienation: The judge allowed the mother to ignore court orders and alienate the child from the plaintiff.
Predetermined Ruling on Rule *.* Motions: The judge indicated a predetermined outcome on Rule *.* motions, denying due process.
Failure to Investigate Complaint: The Judicial Conduct Commission failed to investigate the complaint against Judge Perlow.
Accepting New Order and Dismissing Previous Order: The child support office accepted Judge Perlow's new order and dismissed the previous order without proper legal procedures.*(b).
L
this is my response to the defense to dismiss my claim
Your detailed response to the defendant's motion to dismiss your claim appears thorough and well-documented. Here are some key points you might consider to ensure your response is effective:
*. **Relevance and Conciseness**: Ensure that each point directly counters the arguments made in the defendant's motion to dismiss. Being concise and focused on the legal standards can strengthen your response.
*. **Legal Precedents**: Clearly cite relevant case law and statutes that support your arguments. For example:
- **Monroe v. Pape**: This case supports the right to sue state actors under Section * for constitutional violations.
- **Ex parte Young**: Establishes that federal courts can enjoin state officials from enforcing unconstitutional state laws.
*. **Challenging Judicial Immunity**: Outline specific instances where you believe the judge's actions were administrative rather than judicial, as these are not protected by judicial immunity:
- Incorrect child support calculations.
- Annulling back child support without a proper motion.
*. **Supporting Evidence**: Attach any relevant evidence that supports your claims, such as court orders, communication records, and documentation of the judge's misconduct.
*. **Prospective Relief**: Emphasize that you are seeking prospective
*. **Relevance and Conciseness**: Ensure that each point directly counters the arguments made in the defendant's motion to dismiss. Being concise and focused on the legal standards can strengthen your response.
*. **Legal Precedents**: Clearly cite relevant case law and statutes that support your arguments. For example:
- **Monroe v. Pape**: This case supports the right to sue state actors under Section * for constitutional violations.
- **Ex parte Young**: Establishes that federal courts can enjoin state officials from enforcing unconstitutional state laws.
*. **Challenging Judicial Immunity**: Outline specific instances where you believe the judge's actions were administrative rather than judicial, as these are not protected by judicial immunity:
- Incorrect child support calculations.
- Annulling back child support without a proper motion.
*. **Supporting Evidence**: Attach any relevant evidence that supports your claims, such as court orders, communication records, and documentation of the judge's misconduct.
*. **Prospective Relief**: Emphasize that you are seeking prospective
Start a new chat