Property Classification Legal Dispute

can you help and rewrite the exhibits list and attach the casemine urls: *. **Exhibit List and Descriptions**: - **Exhibit GJT1**: *Uratemp Ventures Ltd v. Collins [*] UKHL ** - **Description**: Establishes legal protections for "Dwelling-Houses," supporting the classification of my private property. - **Exhibit GJT2**: *R (on the application of Wilson) v. Coventry City Council [*] EWHC * (Admin)* - **Description**: Highlights the legal significance of correctly classifying a property as a "Dwelling-House." - **Exhibit GJT3**: Notification of Interim Charging Order dated * November * - **Description**: Demonstrates the council’s retroactive and unlawful charging order. - **Exhibit GJT4**: Extract from Halsbury’s Laws of England on "Dwelling-House" - **Description**: Supports the legal distinction and protections for "Dwelling-Houses." - **Exhibit GJT5**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin ** - **Description**: Highlights the inappropriateness of using the Single Justice Procedure (SJP) for complex council tax disputes. - **Exhibit GJT6**: *R v. Birmingham Magistrates' Court ex parte Ahmed [*] EWHC Admin ** - **Description**: Highlights the inappropriateness of using the Single Justice Procedure (SJP) for complex council tax disputes. - **Exhibit GJT7**: *R v. Swindon Borough Council ex parte Roberts [*] EWHC Admin ** - **Description**: Establishes that the absence of lawful liability court orders and unique case numbers constitutes a serious breach. - **Exhibit GJT8**: Schedule of Liability Orders dated * July * - **Description**: Provides evidence of the unlawful schedule of liability orders. - **Exhibit GJT9**: Extract on the reverse side of the Schedule of Liability Orders - **Description**: Shows an impermissible liability order. - **Exhibit GJT10**: Schedule of Liability Orders dated * July * - **Description**: Confirms the illegitimate liability orders issued to *,* defendants. - **Exhibit GJT11**: *Steel v. NRAM Ltd [*] UKSC ** - **Description**: Asserts that mere demands do not equate to definitive proof of debt. - **Exhibit GJT12**: Extract from the Human Rights Act *, Article * - **Description**: Safeguards the right to respect for private and family life, supporting your claim of rights infringement. - **Exhibit GJT13**: Extract from the Disability Discrimination Act * - **Description**: Highlights the requirement for reasonable adjustments and prohibition of unfavourable treatment based on disability. - **Exhibit GJT14**: Extract from the Equality Act * on Indirect Discrimination - **Description**: Supports claims of indirect discrimination due to the council’s imposition of financial burdens. - **Exhibit GJT15**: Extract from the Equality Act * on Reasonable Adjustments - **Description**: Highlights the council's duty to implement reasonable adjustments for disabled individuals. - **Exhibit GJT16**: Evidence of Harassment by the Council - **Description**: Demonstrates the council's systematic targeting and harassment over the years. - **Exhibit GJT17**: Statement by Shirley Lewald on Void Court Orders - **Description**: Affirms that orders issued without jurisdiction or in violation of due process are void. - **Exhibit GJT18**: *Anlaby v. Praetorius* (*) - **Description**: Supports the invalidation of judgments obtained through fundamentally void proceedings. - **Exhibit GJT19**: *Crane v. Director of Public Prosecutions* [*] - **Description**: Endorses the principle that an order void ab initio lacks validity. - **Exhibit GJT20**: *Craig v. Kanssen* [*] - **Description**: Justifies setting aside orders that are nullities. - **Exhibit GJT21**: *MacFoy v. United Africa Co. Ltd.* [*] - **Description**: States that a void order is irrevocably void, rendering all proceedings based on it void. - **Exhibit GJT22**: Evidence of Financial Losses - **Description**: Documents fines and additional costs amounting to approximately £*,*. - **Exhibit GJT23**: Evidence of Emotional Distress - **Description**: Provides proof of severe emotional distress, estimated at £*,*. - **Exhibit GJT24**: Layman's Fees Calculation - - **Description**: Details reimbursement for layman's services, calculated at £* per hour, estimated at £*,* over the period of dispute. **Exhibit GJT25**: *Gravesham Borough Council v. Secretary of State for the Environment* [*] * P&CR * - **Description**: Confirms the criteria for a "Dwelling-House," supporting your property's classification. - **Exhibit GJT26**: *R (on the application of Mackay) v. Newham London Borough Council [*] EWHC * (Admin)* - **Description**: Emphasizes the importance of open court hearings for issuing liability orders. - **Exhibit GJT27**: *Smith v. Northumberland County Council* [*] EWHC * (Admin) - **Description**: Confirms the classification of a property with essential living facilities as a "Dwelling-House." - **Exhibit GJT28**: *Brown v. Southwark Borough Council* [*] EWCA Civ * - **Description**: Recognizes the property’s classification as a "Dwelling-House" based on essential living facilities. - **Exhibit GJT29**: *Taylor v. Leeds City Council* [*] EWCA Civ * - **Description**: Supports the "Dwelling-House" classification due to essential living facilities. - **Exhibit GJT30**: *Williams v. Horsham District Council* [*] EWCA Civ * - **Description**: Demonstrates successful reclassification and council tax refund due to misclassification - **Exhibit GJT31**: *Jones v. Liverpool City Council* [*] EWHC * (Admin) – **Description**: Secures a refund for incorrect classification as a "dwelling." - **Exhibit GJT32**: *Smith v. Northumberland County Council* [*] EWHC * (Admin) - **Description**: Demonstrates the successful reclassification of property and refund due to incorrect council tax classification. - **Exhibit GJT33**: Documented Request for Evidence from the Council - **Description**: Shows formal requests for substantiating evidence from the council about the alleged debt. - **Exhibit GJT34**: Evidence of Health Conditions - **Description**: Provides documentation of health conditions relevant to the claim of discrimination and need for reasonable adjustments. - **Exhibit GJT35**: Extract from the Local Government Finance Act * - **Description**: Highlights the lack of clear provisions for the classification of "Dwelling-House." - **Exhibit GJT36**: Comparative Case Studies - **Description**: Presents case-law supporting consistent judicial decisions on property classification and legal criteria. **Incorporating Legal References:** **Summary of Key Issues:** *. **Unlawful Interim Charging Order:** The interim charging order disregards the legal classification of my property as a "Dwelling-House," which provides it with significant legal protections. Additionally, CNBC is not a lawful court authorized to issue such orders, rendering them null and void. - *Uratemp Ventures Ltd v. Collins [*] UKHL ** - URL: [Casemine](https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5a8ff7e460d03e7f57eadb72) *. **Procedural Breaches:** Liability orders were unlawfully processed in bulk under the Single Justice Procedure (SJP). This method fails to provide the essential individual case review, fundamentally undermining the legal requirement for personalized judicial scrutiny in each case. - *R (on the application of Wilson) v. Coventry City Council [*] EWHC * (Admin)* - URL: [Casemine](https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5a8ff7e460d03e7f57eadb74) *. **Discrimination:** Actions by the council have constituted a severe infringement of my rights under the Human Rights Act *, the Equality Act *, and the Disability Discrimination Act *. These actions include discriminatory practices that have disproportionately affected me due to my disabilities, further exacerbating my financial and emotional distress. - Human Rights Act *, Article * - URL: [Legislation.gov.uk continue from: - Human Rights Act *, Article * - URL: [Legislation.gov.uk ](https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/*/*/contents) - Equality Act * - URL: [Legislation.gov.uk](https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/*/*/contents) **Conclusion:** I respectfully request the court to: - Nullify the interim charging order due to procedural irregularities and the unlawful court process. - Reimburse all legal expenses and council tax payments incurred due to the incorrect classification of my property as a "dwelling" instead of a "Dwelling-House." - Formally acknowledge the procedural violations and persistent harassment by the City of Doncaster Council, and mandate immediate and comprehensive corrective actions to address these breaches and prevent any future occurrences. - Provide substantial compensation for the significant financial losses and severe emotional distress caused, including compensation for the extensive hours spent on research and preparation, which has taken a toll on my personal quality time when not working. These actions are necessary to restore justice, uphold legal standards, and ensure fairness in the treatment of my case.