Repudiation Acceptance Legal Cases

Summary

The case where the manner of acceptance of repudiation is akin to offer and acceptance is HMBMP Properties (PTY) LTD V King 1981 (1) SA 906 (N). Notice of repudiation conduct is not essential for repudiation. Prevention of performance occurs when one party makes it impossible for the other to perform, while repudiation involves neglecting contractual obligations. All listed types—anticipatory breach, actual breach, and fundamental breach—are forms of repudiation. In the scenario where a company fails to perform its contractual duties, the most appropriate form of breach is Mora debitoris.

Full Conversation

Identify the requirement that is not essential for repudation. (A) Conduct with the intent of future non-compliance. (B) Intention to repudiate. Repudiation requires only wrongfulness. (C) Notice of repudation conduct. Repudation does not require notice. (D) Acceptance by creditor
The requirement that is not essential for repudiation is (C) Notice of repudiation conduct. Repudiation does not necessarily require notice.
. Select the most accurate explanation for the difference between prevention of performance and repudiation. prevention of performance refers to when one party renders it impossible for the next party to perform while repudiation takes place when a party neglects on their contractual obligation. Prevention of performance refers to when a party can perform but not in the proscribed time while repudiation refers to when a party acts in a manner that is not prescribed in the contract. Prevention of performance can be conducted verbally while repudiation is referred to a form of breach that can only occur tacitly between parties to a contract
The most accurate explanation for the difference between prevention of performance and repudiation is the first one: prevention of performance refers to when one party renders it impossible for the next party to perform while repudiation takes place when a party neglects on their contractual obligation.
Indicate which of the following does not form part of the types of repudiation. Anticipatory breach Actual breach Fundamental breach None of the above Indicate which of the following does not form part of the types of repudiation. Anticipatory breach Actual breach Fundamental breach None of the above Indicate which of the following does not form part of the types of repudiation. Anticipatory breach Actual breach Fundamental breach None of the above Indicate which of the following does not form part of the types of repudiation. Anticipatory breach Actual breach Fundamental breach None of the above . Indicate which of the following does not form part of the types of repudiation. Anticipatory breach Actual breach Fundamental breach None of the above
All the options listed - Anticipatory breach, Actual breach, and Fundamental breach - do form part of types of repudiation. So, the answer would be "None of the above".
Kamohelo is a farmer, but he does not own his own machinery. Kamohelo therefore contracts Jerries-we-do-It-all (Pty) Ltd, to cut his maize crop, harvest it, bail it, and transport it to the agricultural markets for sale. The crop is ready for harvest, but Kamohelo is struggling to get hold of Jerries-we-do-It-all (Pty) Ltd, and for days the company's telephone has been offline. Identify the most appropriate form of breach of contract in lieu of the facts above. Prevention of performance. The company is preventing performance by Kamohelo. Mora creditoris. The company is not cooperating. Repudiation. The company no longer intends to be bound. Mora debitoris. The company is failing to perform.
The most appropriate form of breach of contract could be "Mora debitoris". The company is failing to perform their contractual obligation towards Kamohelo. However, this will depend on the specific terms of their contract.